Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Sat May 28, 2011 11:56 pm

William the White wrote:
bobo the clown wrote: Now, of course it's nominal if no-one offers it, but they will. He's in demand & a good few clubs have cash to burn. At an offer of that we are obliged to inform him and allow him to discuss the option with the bidding club.

Regarding the suggestion that these can't exist due to employment laws well, that's horse shit.
Wish they'd get on with it then... If he's going, best to go early...
The season only ended a week ago Bill !
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun May 29, 2011 12:47 am

IF this clause exists, IF, then we aren't getting a penny more than the £17m or whatever it is. Those who think we will are getting told to wise up and live in the real world by ME!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

seanworth
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4049
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:07 pm
Location: thailand/canada

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by seanworth » Sun May 29, 2011 9:17 am

Are you saying that if a player has a buyout clause of 17m, and another club offers 17m exactly neither the club nor Cahill has anything to say about it. Sounds a bit simplistic to me.

Choppers
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 711
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:33 pm
Location: twitter.com/jebusf
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Choppers » Sun May 29, 2011 9:46 am

bobo the clown wrote:
Choppers wrote:
William the White wrote:Upson is damaged goods... OC won't go there
Disagree completely.

Imho, if Cahill goes, Upson will be the first name on Coyle's list to replace him.
Are you fecking mad ???
I don't think so, but if I were mad, I wouldn't be of sound mind and body to be able to say that with any certainty.

For the record, I wouldn't want Upson here, I'm saying that I think Coyle would see him as a top target. English, recently relegated thus cheap.
http://www.godisageek.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | A Videogame Site With A Difference
http://www.twitter.com/jebusf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; | Twitter

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Sun May 29, 2011 10:32 am

Choppers wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Choppers wrote:
William the White wrote:Upson is damaged goods... OC won't go there
Disagree completely.

Imho, if Cahill goes, Upson will be the first name on Coyle's list to replace him.
Are you fecking mad ???
I don't think so, but if I were mad, I wouldn't be of sound mind and body to be able to say that with any certainty.

For the record, I wouldn't want Upson here, I'm saying that I think Coyle would see him as a top target. English, recently relegated thus cheap.
that's a very fair point, so as an outside view let me confirm that you are, I'm afraid. Maybe a visit to the doctor is due before you start harming people or yourself.

Upson would want a wage twice that of anyone else we employ, he would not come North unless to a "top" club ... Oh, & he's shite !

Read KUMB. Even that centre of delusion which is Upton Park acceppt this. He's a bottler, he hidesn he makes huge blunders, he has no heart and he's up himself. .... & these are comments from Wet Spam fans !
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Hoboh » Sun May 29, 2011 11:01 am

bobo the clown wrote:
Choppers wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Choppers wrote:
William the White wrote:Upson is damaged goods... OC won't go there
Disagree completely.

Imho, if Cahill goes, Upson will be the first name on Coyle's list to replace him.
Are you fecking mad ???
I don't think so, but if I were mad, I wouldn't be of sound mind and body to be able to say that with any certainty.

For the record, I wouldn't want Upson here, I'm saying that I think Coyle would see him as a top target. English, recently relegated thus cheap.
that's a very fair point, so as an outside view let me confirm that you are, I'm afraid. Maybe a visit to the doctor is due before you start harming people or yourself.

Upson would want a wage twice that of anyone else we employ, he would not come North unless to a "top" club ... Oh, & he's shite !

Read KUMB. Even that centre of delusion which is Upton Park acceppt this. He's a bottler, he hidesn he makes huge blunders, he has no heart and he's up himself. .... & these are comments from Wet Spam fans !
Thats a little unfair, see Elmander, Taylor, Knight.............. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun May 29, 2011 1:52 pm

seanworth wrote:Are you saying that if a player has a buyout clause of 17m, and another club offers 17m exactly neither the club nor Cahill has anything to say about it. Sounds a bit simplistic to me.

Cahill would, obviously, but we wouldn't. To put it simply, if he has a buy out clause of £17million, then we have to accept any offer on or above that. So if Arsenal offer £16million, United offer £17million, Liverpool offer £17million, and City offer £117million, then we can turn down Arsenal's bid, but have to accept the offers of United, City and Liverpool, it would then be up to Cahill to choose. Obviously then, no-one in their right mind is going to offer a penny more than £17million.

However, the fact Coyle himself has mentioned £20-odd million suggests there is no (longer) a minimum fee clause.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun May 29, 2011 1:57 pm

seanworth wrote:Are you saying that if a player has a buyout clause of 17m, and another club offers 17m exactly neither the club nor Cahill has anything to say about it. Sounds a bit simplistic to me.
Fcuking hell

IF there is a clause

IF a club agrees to match the clause then we have to tell the player the release has been activated and if he decides he wants to leave, he leaves

IF the clause is 17 million then I see absolutely no way we can get more than 17

Dunno if you think that's simplistic or not, but that's the way it is




No clause, then its a free market but the player could still force our hand

If Bingobongo FC from Bongobingo offer 250 million and City offer 20 million (for example), we'd be forced by the player into accepting the lower offer
Sto ut Serviam

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun May 29, 2011 2:18 pm

And if he wants to play for Bingobongo FC?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun May 29, 2011 2:19 pm

Then he'd go there, and their accountant would have a coronary.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Sun May 29, 2011 2:20 pm

then we've finally got enough money to buy Leroy Lita.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun May 29, 2011 2:21 pm

He won't go there cos Shittu is first choice
Sto ut Serviam

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by bobo the clown » Sun May 29, 2011 2:21 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:And if he wants to play for Bingobongo FC?
.... are they in the European Cup next season ?
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun May 29, 2011 2:27 pm

Anyway, what people are overlooking here is, clause or no clause, the richest club in this country have owners who don't give a shit if they overspend by a few bob. So City will offer over the odds, and pay wages over the odds, because they are in a cock measuring contest that they want to win. So of course they'll offer more than the others, because they ain't counting the pennies. And they can't be arsed losing when money means f*ck all to them.

We need City involved, because any clause becomes irrelevant by their presence.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun May 29, 2011 2:33 pm

Still reckon you're wrong

City will do no more than match the clause

Where they will chuck their cash is at the player
Sto ut Serviam

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sun May 29, 2011 2:36 pm

They'll beat the clause if it exists, because they won't be arsed getting involved in an auction. Money doesn't matter to them. The odd 3 or 4 million to guarantee they're first in the queue for everything is right up their street. Remember, he will be free to speak to everyone who matches it or above. They'll want us pushing for him to go to City as much as they'll be chucking money at him.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun May 29, 2011 2:50 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:They'll beat the clause if it exists, because they won't be arsed getting involved in an auction. Money doesn't matter to them. The odd 3 or 4 million to guarantee they're first in the queue for everything is right up their street. Remember, he will be free to speak to everyone who matches it or above. They'll want us pushing for him to go to City as much as they'll be chucking money at him.
If theres a clause at 17, he'll go for 17

Just watch :)
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun May 29, 2011 3:07 pm

How are people not getting this? There will be no auction in terms of transfer fee. If City turn up tomorrow, and offer £40million, we will accept it obviously. However imagine Cahill is hoping Arsenal will come in for him so he drags his feet on terms. If a week later Arsenal offer £17 million, we still have to accept their bid. City wont offer more than £17million, because it doesn't buy them anything else. We still have to accept all offers at or above £17million.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun May 29, 2011 3:10 pm

Prufrock wrote:How are people not getting this? There will be no auction in terms of transfer fee. If City turn up tomorrow, and offer £40million, we will accept it obviously. However imagine Cahill is hoping Arsenal will come in for him so he drags his feet on terms. If a week later Arsenal offer £17 million, we still have to accept their bid. City wont offer more than £17million, because it doesn't buy them anything else. We still have to accept all offers at or above £17million.
Lets leave it now

WE know we're right
Sto ut Serviam

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Sun May 29, 2011 3:19 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:They'll beat the clause if it exists, because they won't be arsed getting involved in an auction. Money doesn't matter to them. The odd 3 or 4 million to guarantee they're first in the queue for everything is right up their street. Remember, he will be free to speak to everyone who matches it or above. They'll want us pushing for him to go to City as much as they'll be chucking money at him.
If City want to use their financial muscle it'll be with the player.

17m accepted all round. But City could quite easily offer double whatever Arsenal/Spurs etc. offer him.

Not that I think any of this matters, City will be the only club who even considers going up past 15M.

Thank feck they're interested.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dave the minion, Google [Bot], jmjhb, truewhite15 and 28 guests