Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:23 pm

MJH-12 wrote:
Lofthouse Lower wrote:better than Petrov? Martin Petrov?

:doh:
Mate, come on. Stop defending him. He had 2-3 good games ALL season! Time to ship him off, especially on the wages we must be paying him
He's a superb player, and has been throughout his career. Am prepared to be patient with him.

Lofthouse Lower
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7416
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Lofthouse Lower » Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:24 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:SWP at his best offers pace and unpredictability, a bit like a younger Ricardo...unfortunately SWP is no longer at his best so if he does come we should pay him accordingly !
Always maintained that everything good that Phillips has ever done has been completely accidental. He has never 'meant' any of it

aussie_wanderer
Promising
Promising
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:41 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by aussie_wanderer » Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:07 am

either Nedum Onuoha or Dedryck Boyata, or both, could be part of a swap and cash for cahill.
wats ur thaughts on these guys?

m_taylor
Promising
Promising
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by m_taylor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:03 am

aussie_wanderer wrote:either Nedum Onuoha or Dedryck Boyata, or both, could be part of a swap and cash for cahill.
wats ur thaughts on these guys?
Great deal if we could get those 2 decent players IMO and some Cash, I doubt Boyata will want to move so i would be happy with Onuoha and 10mil.

Raven
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2004
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 10:04 pm
Location: Near Coventry but originally from Kent

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Raven » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:13 pm

Lofthouse Lower wrote:better than Petrov? Martin Petrov?

:doh:
My 3 legged arthritic terrier is better than Petrov!
My dog (proper 57) had his anal glands emptied once and yes the smell is something to behold!!

aussie_wanderer
Promising
Promising
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:41 am

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by aussie_wanderer » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:23 pm

i recon petrov will have a big season, people forget its hard to settle into a new team straight away,

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by boltonboris » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:25 pm

Balls to that.. If he'd moved here from abroad, I'd be inclined to agree, but He's been in England, for what 4? 5 years?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:57 pm

http://www.newsnow.co.uk/A/499225240?-11201" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ChrisC » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:04 pm

boltonboris wrote:Balls to that.. If he'd moved here from abroad, I'd be inclined to agree, but He's been in England, for what 4? 5 years?

Spot on :whack:


You would imagine he hasn't even had to move house to come to us either.


Personally i think he a good player but since coming to us from the massives up the road he has got the billy big bollocks about him. If he got his head down he could be more positive for the team.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:05 pm

Plus, at 48 years old, he's not getting any younger.

LiOC
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 658
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:26 pm
Location: Preston

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by LiOC » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:06 pm

I don't think there's too much to question over Petrov's ability, just he attitude and motivation. I don't think settling in has anything to do with that.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:03 pm

Settling in isn't going to suddenly make the cnut run. Or try. Or not be utter wank.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:04 pm

Prufrock wrote:Settling in isn't going to suddenly make the cnut run. Or try. Or not be utter wank.
Exactly, if you are having trouble settling in, what would you do? You'd try so feckin' hard that your effort overshadows any shortcomings
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:51 pm

according to click lancashire.....

and, more importantly, according to "reports" :wink:
click lancashire wrote: According to reports Manchester City are backing out of the chase for Bolton Wanderers defender Gary Cahill.

The Sun claims Wanderers are demanding £17 million to land Cahill.

However, while City boss Roberto Mancini is known to have Cahill on his list of summer targets, it seems he is not prepared to meet that valuation.

In addition, Kolo Toure’s return in early September from a drugs ban means the hunt for a centre-back has become less pressing.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 08, 2011 2:52 pm

errr...bothered, Roberto.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:25 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:errr...bothered, Roberto.
Hmm. If those boys drop, so does Cahill's fee.

ohjimmyjimmy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4108
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by ohjimmyjimmy » Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:29 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:errr...bothered, Roberto.
Hmm. If those boys drop, so does Cahill's fee.
What about the minimum fee that triggers the release clause?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:38 pm

ohjimmyjimmy wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:errr...bothered, Roberto.
Hmm. If those boys drop, so does Cahill's fee.
What about the minimum fee that triggers the release clause?
The one that drops to zero in 12 months' time?

City are the only ones (interested) with the cash and the mindset to pay the release fee. Liverpool have a rebuilding job on and have spent big on Henderson – BUT that's also the problem: they've spent big on Henderson (and are apparently set to buy Charlie Adam for a frankly bonkers £8m). United are signing Phil Jones to partner Chris Smalling medium-term, Arsenal won't spend that sort of money on ANY f*cker and Chelsea have only ever been linked with Cahill in the week running up to them playing us.

Assuming there's no rouble-rich Russians eyeing up our Gaz, City are the only team likely to pay anything like the lucre we'd like. Otherwise we'd be entering a frustratingly slow-moving world of low-ball bids and sneaky unsettlement (eh, Master Wilshere?), while our own targets might well be moving on elsewhere.

I know I joked with Tombwfc earlier this week (re Al-Habsi) that it's no time to panic, but selling Cahill for £££ has been the bedrock of pretty much everybody's summer plans - not just on here, I'm guessing, but also at BWFC, where Gartside and Coyle have made little secret of their intention to rebuild a paper-thin squad with the incoming fee. This latest may well be a bullshit story or simply Mancini (or rather Garry Cook) trying to sabre-rattle, but it's chilled my blood more than any news since Holden's injury - and in truth it could have a much longer-term effect.

jimbo_bwfc
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by jimbo_bwfc » Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:44 pm

To be fair, The Sun doesn't really report that at all. The only line in there was;

"But Eastlands sources indicated the trail had gone cold as he had a shaky end to the season."

Nothing about not wanting to stump up the fee, that's just a figment of Click Lancashire/Manchester's imagination.

Although the line in the Sun doesn't make much sense. He's had his shaky end of the season over a month ago. Unless City's scouting was saving our matches on SkyPlus, and they decided to get through the omnibus of Corrie before they got onto our games, they wouldn't have suddenly decided to pull out of the deal now, they wouldn't have been in for him in the first place.
City are the only ones (interested) with the cash and the mindset to pay the release fee.
It was interesting to read that Wenger held talks with Phil jones last night. Perhaps Arsenal aren't quite out of the race yet. Their fans are demanding a centre-back, and it's unlikely Blackburn will let Samba go now that Jones is on his way to United.

Wenger's hand might be forced to overpay- although that of course is on the basis that City still maintain their interest.
http://www.twitter.com/jderbyshirebwfc

"Like putting a tiara on a shirehorse"

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread

Post by thebish » Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:08 pm

further to the citeh story...
Mancini is also looking at Vincent Kompany's Belgium team-mate Jan Vertonghen, who could be bought for a lot less than Cahill from Ajax.

Kompany is convinced he would be an excellent addition for City, particularly as he could be used as a left-back or a defensive midfielder, even though his boss wasn't totally impressed by him following a recent scouting trip.

"You hear 40 names per month of players who could move to Manchester City. However, it is not a coincidence that Vertonghen is linked with the club," Kompany told the Manchester Evening News.

"Jan is ready to make the next step and is good enough for City.

"I am sure that he will succeed at his next club, regardless of whether he joins us or decides to move elsewhere. He is simply a fantastic footballer."

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], truewhite15 and 29 guests