TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:42 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
i wouldn't give up my flamin hot monster munch for him
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Some of the chances i've seen that fool miss, i dont give a monkeys how good he may be outside the box with his back to goal, a goalscoring striker please.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Lord Kangana wrote:In a deal worth no more than £4.45m at a guess.
Sweet lord almighty, if we sign him for any more than 2.5 million i've lost all hope
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
actually if we sign him it all i've lost hope
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Aye, to think we used to moan about Helgusson, Rasiak and Bratten.Relentless09 wrote:actually if we sign him it all i've lost hope

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
He's not worse than Rasiak.
I've actually seen him score.
I've actually seen him score.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
AH, okay, but some moaned about Borgetti.Lord Kangana wrote:He's not worse than Rasiak.
I've actually seen him score.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31636
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I thought this was going to say "abuse Jerome gets"...m_taylor wrote:He isn't the finished article but with some work from a good man manager (eg Coyle) then he could be and sold on for more. My bro is a brum fan ands says he can't understand the...
...but no.m_taylor wrote:My bro is a brum fan ands says he can't understand the interest and would sell him to anyone that is willing to actually pay his wages!
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Jerome isn't awful. He just isn't worth anything like what Birmingham seem to want.
He was the best player on the pitch for Birmingham when we beat em in the Cup game, made Wheater look a fool for 90mins and he's clearly got abit of presence about him.
At like 2-3m as depth up front he'd be a pretty decent signing. At 4-5m as a guarenteed starter, I'd be thinking about planning trips down to Milwall and Doncaster for next year.
He was the best player on the pitch for Birmingham when we beat em in the Cup game, made Wheater look a fool for 90mins and he's clearly got abit of presence about him.
At like 2-3m as depth up front he'd be a pretty decent signing. At 4-5m as a guarenteed starter, I'd be thinking about planning trips down to Milwall and Doncaster for next year.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Not me...met him in Tavern on the Hill one day and we had a chat, top fella.TANGODANCER wrote:AH, okay, but some moaned about Borgetti.Lord Kangana wrote:He's not worse than Rasiak.
I've actually seen him score.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
But i would like to think we're not looking for in-depth so much as a striker to actually play most games & score, instead of starting Davies & Klasnic.jimbo_bwfc wrote:Jerome isn't awful. He just isn't worth anything like what Birmingham seem to want.
He was the best player on the pitch for Birmingham when we beat em in the Cup game, made Wheater look a fool for 90mins and he's clearly got abit of presence about him.
At like 2-3m as depth up front he'd be a pretty decent signing. At 4-5m as a guarenteed starter, I'd be thinking about planning trips down to Milwall and Doncaster for next year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
I don't recall anyone moaning about Borgetti. I thought the general consensus was that he pehaps should have been played more?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Totally.Lord Kangana wrote:I don't recall anyone moaning about Borgetti. I thought the general consensus was that he pehaps should have been played more?
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Why oh WHY are we not looking a Shane Long, he has potential has a good goalscoring record in the Championship must be worth a punt. Nobody seems interested so would get him for a decent price! Yes it would be a risk but no more than signing Jerome or Ngog!!!!
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
They want about 7 million for Shane Long.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31636
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
It's a Jim-off!ohjimmyjimmy wrote:But i would like to think we're not looking for in-depth so much as a striker to actually play most games & score, instead of starting Davies & Klasnic.jimbo_bwfc wrote:Jerome isn't awful. He just isn't worth anything like what Birmingham seem to want.
He was the best player on the pitch for Birmingham when we beat em in the Cup game, made Wheater look a fool for 90mins and he's clearly got abit of presence about him.
At like 2-3m as depth up front he'd be a pretty decent signing. At 4-5m as a guarenteed starter, I'd be thinking about planning trips down to Milwall and Doncaster for next year.
Both right, I think. Thing is we can't necessarily sign The Main Striker first then Back-Ups, depends which order they become available in. A bit like you can't really decided when to sell players who aren't transfer listed - if a bid comes in at a price you like you can't say "Sorry Sam come back in a month" and be sure that he will.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Jim-Off 
True - though my main concern is that Jimbo thinks we'd be signing Jerome as our back-up, which i would be pleased with as i'd be expecting another, better signing to come . However I fear he'd be more our 'main striker' signing, if we spent over 2m on him.

True - though my main concern is that Jimbo thinks we'd be signing Jerome as our back-up, which i would be pleased with as i'd be expecting another, better signing to come . However I fear he'd be more our 'main striker' signing, if we spent over 2m on him.
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
They wanted £7m when they thought there would be a stampede, no interest nearing the end of the window a team needing to sell. This must add up to be able to get him for £4-5m which I think would be in our budget if OC wanted him and thought the price was rightThey want about 7 million for Shane Long.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
It'll be Jerome (or equivalent) + loanee if I had to place a bet.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: TKIZ's impossibly brilliant all new Transfer Rumours thr
Is he planning a "swoop" instead ?thebish wrote:apparently Coyle has ruled out a Barton "raid"...
£70k pw he's asking.
He may be on the shelf a while then !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot] and 34 guests