Poor due diligence at best, at worst.....very scary
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Poor due diligence at best, at worst.....very scary
I miss him (especially since in this case he appears to agree with me and knows more about in addition). Perhaps in the passage of time he has mellowed and site admin could reconsider????CAPSLOCK wrote:Great loss, this fellacommunistworkethic
August 25, 2011
so the fact that it is a different part of a conglomerate is not relevant? or the fact they haven’t made them since 2000? or the fact they were made solely to defend the border with North Korea, the most mental rogue state in the world? Or that the law on Korea compensates anyone injured, though why you’d be in the DMZ I don’t know. Perhaps people should refuse to accept the Nobel prize because Alfred Nobel invented dynamite and that’s been weaponised too? And what about the people that die each year from alcohol related diseases, should we decline the money from the League Cup sponsors? I hope when your knee jerked you didn’t kick yourself in the face.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- tell ben im him
- Hopeful
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 1:32 pm
- Location: very close
Re: Poor due diligence at best, at worst.....very scary
A friend of mine just started his own business in Afghanistan .jaffka wrote:quite useful landmines in some scenarios
He's making land mines that look like prayer mats.
It's doing well.
He says prophets are going through the roof

am i right or am i right?
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Poor due diligence at best, at worst.....very scary
Perhaps his 'brother' could open an account?Montreal Wanderer wrote:I miss him (especially since in this case he appears to agree with me and knows more about in addition). Perhaps in the passage of time he has mellowed and site admin could reconsider????CAPSLOCK wrote:Great loss, this fellacommunistworkethic
August 25, 2011
so the fact that it is a different part of a conglomerate is not relevant? or the fact they haven’t made them since 2000? or the fact they were made solely to defend the border with North Korea, the most mental rogue state in the world? Or that the law on Korea compensates anyone injured, though why you’d be in the DMZ I don’t know. Perhaps people should refuse to accept the Nobel prize because Alfred Nobel invented dynamite and that’s been weaponised too? And what about the people that die each year from alcohol related diseases, should we decline the money from the League Cup sponsors? I hope when your knee jerked you didn’t kick yourself in the face.

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Poor due diligence at best, at worst.....very scary
Yes, look out for communistleisureethis....Gary the Enfield wrote:Perhaps his 'brother' could open an account?Montreal Wanderer wrote:I miss him (especially since in this case he appears to agree with me and knows more about in addition). Perhaps in the passage of time he has mellowed and site admin could reconsider????CAPSLOCK wrote:Great loss, this fellacommunistworkethic
August 25, 2011
so the fact that it is a different part of a conglomerate is not relevant? or the fact they haven’t made them since 2000? or the fact they were made solely to defend the border with North Korea, the most mental rogue state in the world? Or that the law on Korea compensates anyone injured, though why you’d be in the DMZ I don’t know. Perhaps people should refuse to accept the Nobel prize because Alfred Nobel invented dynamite and that’s been weaponised too? And what about the people that die each year from alcohol related diseases, should we decline the money from the League Cup sponsors? I hope when your knee jerked you didn’t kick yourself in the face.

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests