Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
He didnt reject anyone, he never had the chance to. Chump!Abs wrote:lol he rejected spurs......its clear he wanted arsenal. next year son next year
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Deluded as usual.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Would be nice if Coyle was that much of a charmer.BWFC_Insane wrote:Iles tweeted that having heard what Spurs were offering, he feels Bolton must have a plan, hinting that he thinks they wouldn't have turned down the Spurs offer if they thought Cahill wouldn't sign a new deal here.
If so-

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Spurs may still be looking to do a deal in January.
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/8 ... z1WifPuzXW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice to read that Cahill refused to ask to be released.
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/8 ... z1WifPuzXW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice to read that Cahill refused to ask to be released.
I feel reborn !!!! No more confussion
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Think that article sums things up really we'll offer him a new contract, presumably with a huge wadge of extra cash and a lower release clause, if thats a no go we'll get what we can in January for him.Riviman wrote:Spurs may still be looking to do a deal in January.
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/8 ... z1WifPuzXW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice to read that Cahill refused to ask to be released.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
i think spurs are wanting this rumour out so that gary doesn't sign a new contract.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Why?BWFC_Insane wrote:Think that article sums things up really we'll offer him a new contract, presumably with a huge wadge of extra cash and a lower release clause, if thats a no go we'll get what we can in January for him.Riviman wrote:Spurs may still be looking to do a deal in January.
http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/8 ... z1WifPuzXW" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nice to read that Cahill refused to ask to be released.
Tying him down to a lengthier contract will add to his value, surely? No point selling ourselves short when we've been digging our heels in so stubbornly for £17m with one year left.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
To get him to actually sign the damn thing?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Maybe we could kidnap his parents and then see what he thinks
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Classic arrogant Harry tactic:
"Redknapp was then hoping the player himself would help push through a deal by telling Coyle he wanted to leave."
Might have worked if he'd been manager of a top club.
"Redknapp was then hoping the player himself would help push through a deal by telling Coyle he wanted to leave."
Might have worked if he'd been manager of a top club.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Abs wrote:lol he rejected spurs......its clear he wanted arsenal. next year son next year
why?
surely you dont need a quick tackling, cultured, ball playing centre half when you've just signed one with the turning circle of the Titanic?
btw- is Arteta injured yet?
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Shirley this is a form of tapping up? Trying to persuade the player to put in a transfer request to avoid paying the parent club the asking price can't be legal can it?TANGODANCER wrote:Classic arrogant Harry tactic:
"Redknapp was then hoping the player himself would help push through a deal by telling Coyle he wanted to leave."
Might have worked if he'd been manager of a top club.
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
It can be if your face fits..CrazyHorse wrote:Shirley this is a form of tapping up? Trying to persuade the player to put in a transfer request to avoid paying the parent club the asking price can't be legal can it?TANGODANCER wrote:Classic arrogant Harry tactic:
"Redknapp was then hoping the player himself would help push through a deal by telling Coyle he wanted to leave."
Might have worked if he'd been manager of a top club.
Literally fits.. It's all over the feckin' place!
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Again, pure Harry, but is it also media hype? Harry's far too crafty to have actually said it publicly or put it in print.CrazyHorse wrote:Shirley this is a form of tapping up? Trying to persuade the player to put in a transfer request to avoid paying the parent club the asking price can't be legal can it?TANGODANCER wrote:Classic arrogant Harry tactic:
"Redknapp was then hoping the player himself would help push through a deal by telling Coyle he wanted to leave."
Might have worked if he'd been manager of a top club.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
We have vermaelen who is twice the player Cahill is. We need someone with presence and dominant in the air. Anyway you will lose him for free and your chairman made a huge mistakelovethesmellofnapalm wrote:Abs wrote:lol he rejected spurs......its clear he wanted arsenal. next year son next year
why?
surely you dont need a quick tackling, cultured, ball playing centre half when you've just signed one with the turning circle of the Titanic?
btw- is Arteta injured yet?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Any chance we could lose you for free?Abs wrote:We have vermaelen who is twice the player Cahill is. We need someone with presence and dominant in the air. Anyway you will lose him for free and your chairman made a huge mistake
Businesswoman of the year.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:08 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Isn't time you f ucked off? Can't wait for next week and the schools going back so we'll be rid of this tosspot.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
You still here? You're just sounding more childish than ever. Give it up and go support your team. Try to spot a Wanderers fan on your site; that should keep you busy for a season or so.Abs wrote: We have vermaelen who is twice the player Cahill is. We need someone with presence and dominant in the air. Anyway you will lose him for free and your chairman made a huge mistake
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Abs wrote:We have vermaelen who is twice the player Cahill is. We need someone with presence and dominant in the air. Anyway you will lose him for free and your chairman made a huge mistakelovethesmellofnapalm wrote:Abs wrote:lol he rejected spurs......its clear he wanted arsenal. next year son next year
why?
surely you dont need a quick tackling, cultured, ball playing centre half when you've just signed one with the turning circle of the Titanic?
btw- is Arteta injured yet?

and zat knight is twice the player walcott is
no he really is
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Yawn.Abs wrote:We have vermaelen who is twice the player Cahill is. We need someone with presence and dominant in the air. Anyway you will lose him for free and your chairman made a huge mistakelovethesmellofnapalm wrote:Abs wrote:lol he rejected spurs......its clear he wanted arsenal. next year son next year
why?
surely you dont need a quick tackling, cultured, ball playing centre half when you've just signed one with the turning circle of the Titanic?
btw- is Arteta injured yet?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests