Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Annoyed Grunt wrote:I wish your dad would hurry up and finish with your sister, will be your turn then and you can feck off.Wearsider wrote:plymouth wanderer wrote:oh that's a for gone conclusion than
cvnt
Sorry, but could you please try to speak intelligible English?
You moron.
Is that really all you can come up with?
Jesus, you lot are thick!


- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
chaddy_bwfc wrote:I think you'll find it's "that's" so could you please try to speak intelligible English?Wearsider wrote:plymouth wanderer wrote:Wearsider wrote:plymouth wanderer wrote:oh that's a for gone conclusion than
cvnt
Sorry, but could you please try to speak intelligible English?
You moron.
djffekkv kjfnjefje njkefjefnbjenf kefjnenfjenfn Newcastle United !!!
CVNT
To be fair, thats probably your best post ever.



BUSTED
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
I'm sure it's 3 wins out of 3 for the mackems against the massive club bolton? 

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Wearsider wrote:Annoyed Grunt wrote:I wish your dad would hurry up and finish with your sister, will be your turn then and you can feck off.Wearsider wrote:plymouth wanderer wrote:oh that's a for gone conclusion than
cvnt
Sorry, but could you please try to speak intelligible English?
You moron.
Is that really all you can come up with?
Jesus, you lot are thick!![]()

Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
[/quote]
To be fair, thats probably your best post ever.
[/quote]
I think you'll find it's "that's" so could you please try to speak intelligible English?[/quote]

BUSTED[/quote]
Ooh, I am gutted.
It's a good job i have three lovely points to console me!

To be fair, thats probably your best post ever.

I think you'll find it's "that's" so could you please try to speak intelligible English?[/quote]



BUSTED[/quote]
Ooh, I am gutted.

It's a good job i have three lovely points to console me!



Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Who the feck in their right mind would pay £15m+ for Cahill?
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Sebadee wrote:Who the feck in their right mind would pay £15m+ for Cahill?
who the fvck would pay anything for Titus bramble
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
steve bruce likes wasting money thats not his.
probably him.
owen out
probably him.
owen out
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Shambolic - an absolute disorganised shower of shite....
Coyle and his back room boys are tactically clueless, like every game we come out flying for the 1st 15 mins and if we don't score
we revert to type (just shows you how poor Wigan are....). 2nd half was like the fecking Alamo, Sunderland played well 2nd half but saying that its not hard to beat Bolton these days, upfront we have nothing and rarely look like scoring - we're toothless, and lack passion & fight and have absolutely zero quality and creativity in that team (why is Coyle still playing KD ahead of Tuncay - when KD does nothing week in week out, he's a passenger....), and against better teams (Yes Sunderland have a better side then us) we can't continue to play 4-4-2 because we are just so open and easy to play through.
As much as Eagles got a lot of praise last week, he was bloody awful today as was Reo Coker (who was shocking IMO), Robinson (that's a shock !) and yet again Kevin Davies - we just have to hope that there are 2 other teams as bad as Wigan, otherwise we're down this season, because we have a poor squad with to many championship level players.
For me the Swansea game is massive - if we lose next week then Coyle and his amateur 'sunday league level' backroom pals can do one....because I just can't see how he can turn this shower of shite into a winning team capable of getting anywhere near to 40 points.
Coyle and his back room boys are tactically clueless, like every game we come out flying for the 1st 15 mins and if we don't score
we revert to type (just shows you how poor Wigan are....). 2nd half was like the fecking Alamo, Sunderland played well 2nd half but saying that its not hard to beat Bolton these days, upfront we have nothing and rarely look like scoring - we're toothless, and lack passion & fight and have absolutely zero quality and creativity in that team (why is Coyle still playing KD ahead of Tuncay - when KD does nothing week in week out, he's a passenger....), and against better teams (Yes Sunderland have a better side then us) we can't continue to play 4-4-2 because we are just so open and easy to play through.
As much as Eagles got a lot of praise last week, he was bloody awful today as was Reo Coker (who was shocking IMO), Robinson (that's a shock !) and yet again Kevin Davies - we just have to hope that there are 2 other teams as bad as Wigan, otherwise we're down this season, because we have a poor squad with to many championship level players.
For me the Swansea game is massive - if we lose next week then Coyle and his amateur 'sunday league level' backroom pals can do one....because I just can't see how he can turn this shower of shite into a winning team capable of getting anywhere near to 40 points.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
i can say all that faster-
owen out
owen out
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
The team is simply not fecking good enough.
Wheater, Cahill and Boyata did their jobs, defended like their lives depended on it and in my opinion along with Jaaskelainen are the only players that can escape criticism after that shower of shit today.
Ricardo Gardner coming on displayed exactly why he should be at left back rather than Robinson, we looked a million times better in that position when that absolute useless piece of shit moved to right back, which was where their 2nd goal came from, Robinson was nowhere to be seen.
Reo-Coker was awful, I mean really really bad. Everything he did was bad. Darren Pratley is simply not good enough for this division and I can't understand why he continues to be picked. Can't we just stick Stuart Holden on? I know he's injured but he'd do a better job on one leg, we're missing him so much.
Eagles and Petrov were both piss poor at everything, Ngog was non existent and Kevin Davies, well, we all know what to expect from him, nothing.
We look like we're nailed on for 19th this season because while we're really bad, there is one team that's worse than us in Wigan.
Wheater, Cahill and Boyata did their jobs, defended like their lives depended on it and in my opinion along with Jaaskelainen are the only players that can escape criticism after that shower of shit today.
Ricardo Gardner coming on displayed exactly why he should be at left back rather than Robinson, we looked a million times better in that position when that absolute useless piece of shit moved to right back, which was where their 2nd goal came from, Robinson was nowhere to be seen.
Reo-Coker was awful, I mean really really bad. Everything he did was bad. Darren Pratley is simply not good enough for this division and I can't understand why he continues to be picked. Can't we just stick Stuart Holden on? I know he's injured but he'd do a better job on one leg, we're missing him so much.
Eagles and Petrov were both piss poor at everything, Ngog was non existent and Kevin Davies, well, we all know what to expect from him, nothing.
We look like we're nailed on for 19th this season because while we're really bad, there is one team that's worse than us in Wigan.
Last edited by Gail Platz on Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38814
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Worse than any performance Megsons sides ever produced! Much much much worse!
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
A clueless idiotplymouth wanderer wrote:Sebadee wrote:Who the feck in their right mind would pay £15m+ for Cahill?
who the fvck would pay anything for Titus bramble
I wonder if Coyle is interested
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)

that says alot about steve bruce
muppet
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Didn't play well, hate ten-man defending that just keeps giving them the ball back. What chances we had we never looked like scoring. Petrov, ball rolling, twelve yards out, no defenders near and he hits the keeper who never had to move. That was missing a sitter personified. When Davies went off we never won a long ball, Klasnic just gets pushed off the ball every time and Eagles had an accuracy crisis. We never dominated the game anywhere and didn't deserve any more than we got. It was tight and I was fully expecting a point. We got nothing and Sunderland played like the home team instead of us. Reo Coker was the only one with a clue in midfield till Ricky came on. No use moaning though, we'd better just improve in a hurry.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
It does aye, my point being Bruce is a clueless idiotplymouth wanderer wrote:![]()
that says alot about steve bruce
muppet
However, he is a clueless idiot whose team has just picked up 3 easy points
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
bravo bravo i congratulate you
Not bad for a team who's spent loads
Not bad for a team who's spent loads
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
my guess is we'd have had slightly more respect for you if you had come on here before the game - rather than your "post when you're winning" strategy.. that's a wee bit pathetic, son.Sebadee wrote:It does aye, my point being Bruce is a clueless idiotplymouth wanderer wrote:![]()
that says alot about steve bruce
muppet
However, he is a clueless idiot whose team has just picked up 3 easy points
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Slaggin Pratley off is a little harsh.
I thought he played well today.
Eagles was piss poor and greedy today. Would have liked to have seen kakuta on for him and petrov slung on the left with Gardner.
What does piss me off is we have players for each position with the squad we have. Moving Robinson over to cover our right back is shocking. Steinsson is fit is he not? There is not one Bolton fan would have said shove Robbo there instead.
There is something wrong with the club at the moment and unless it is addressed then there is only one way down.
I thought he played well today.
Eagles was piss poor and greedy today. Would have liked to have seen kakuta on for him and petrov slung on the left with Gardner.
What does piss me off is we have players for each position with the squad we have. Moving Robinson over to cover our right back is shocking. Steinsson is fit is he not? There is not one Bolton fan would have said shove Robbo there instead.
There is something wrong with the club at the moment and unless it is addressed then there is only one way down.
Re: Wanderers v The Delusional (Mackems)
Well my guess is, I had no idea about this board until I read a quote from here on RTG. Something about us being a small club....thebish wrote:my guess is we'd have had slightly more respect for you if you had come on here before the game - rather than your "post when you're winning" strategy.. that's a wee bit pathetic, son.Sebadee wrote:It does aye, my point being Bruce is a clueless idiotplymouth wanderer wrote:![]()
that says alot about steve bruce
muppet
However, he is a clueless idiot whose team has just picked up 3 easy points

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 33 guests