Mark Davies

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:23 pm

He'd played his role just right against Wolves, unfortunately, Steinsson didn't.

It was pretty clear to see that our game plan was to expose their left back. Mark Davies moves inside, takes a wide player with him and frees up some space for Steinsson to go at Elokobi. Steinsson either bottled it, or wasn't fit enough to get up and down the flank.

Shame really, it's a good tactic if you have the personnel
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Tombwfc » Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:26 pm

£4mil is a fair price for his ability, but I don't think it'd make much sense to sell him.

Even if we're completely fecked financially (and I don't believe we are, not a firesale extent anyway) we're going to have to field somebody next season. Davies is young, under a long-term contract on presumably reasonable wages and I'm sure would do very well in the Championship.

As for how good he is, I think he's done ok this season, and gets a lot of undeserved stick for his lack of end product (his isn't great, but neither is that of any of the other midfielders at the club, including Holden). Being a creative player in our team is a near impossible job.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:27 pm

You only be creative if the stumps in front of you don't just stand there watching you.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by BWFC_Insane » Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:39 pm

boltonboris wrote:He'd played his role just right against Wolves, unfortunately, Steinsson didn't.

It was pretty clear to see that our game plan was to expose their left back. Mark Davies moves inside, takes a wide player with him and frees up some space for Steinsson to go at Elokobi. Steinsson either bottled it, or wasn't fit enough to get up and down the flank.

Shame really, it's a good tactic if you have the personnel
I'm not having it that the best way to expose a full back is to have your "wide right player" never actually up against the full back and always coming inside....

If you have Cafu at right back, maybe, otherwise no......

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:44 pm

It's easier to get through 1 v 1, than 2 v 2
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Mark Davies

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:11 pm

jimbo wrote:What's the mind boggling at? He has great feet, can dribble with the ball, and can pass - I think we're all agreed on that. Problem comes with him playing the game of football, which I'm still not convinced he's very good at. He can't play in any position in the 4-4-2 that we're so rigidly sticking to. There's plenty of other players who've had the same problems in the past and struggled to fulfill their promise and potential.
The mind's boggling Jimbo at the fact that with half a season gone we're already down and losing the Sky money, according to some. As a Whites fan I'm not blind to the fact we're struggling, but fxcking hell, we'll do a lot better if we part with the likes of MD now and just accept we're going down? Yeah, right.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Mark Davies

Post by officer_dibble » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:18 pm

id keep him for next season in the championship, hopefully a manager not stuck to 442 will use him correctly. Might be his level, might be what he needs to kick on a level.

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by malcd1 » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:44 pm

Armchair Wanderer wrote:MD is definitely in OC's first XI at the moment, or has been recently. He's not out of contract in the summer and you'd think he'd be one for the future.
According to Wiki he signed a 4 and a half year deal in January 2009 which was extended by a further year in February 2011. I can't see Owen wanting to get rid of him and think this is just paper talk.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: Mark Davies

Post by jimbo » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:49 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
jimbo wrote:What's the mind boggling at? He has great feet, can dribble with the ball, and can pass - I think we're all agreed on that. Problem comes with him playing the game of football, which I'm still not convinced he's very good at. He can't play in any position in the 4-4-2 that we're so rigidly sticking to. There's plenty of other players who've had the same problems in the past and struggled to fulfill their promise and potential.
The mind's boggling Jimbo at the fact that with half a season gone we're already down and losing the Sky money, according to some. As a Whites fan I'm not blind to the fact we're struggling, but fxcking hell, we'll do a lot better if we part with the likes of MD now and just accept we're going down? Yeah, right.
Problem is the current bunch haven't shown anything at all in the first half of the season to suggest that it will turn around quickly. We can't blame fixtures any more, and it's pointless blaming injuries because by the time the 2 most significant ones are back the season will be as good as over. That is why me and others think the situation is pretty irretrievable now. The team seem incapable of stringing any kind of run together, while others are beginning to pull away. I desperately hope I'm wrong, but highly doubt it. And I agree with not selling Mark Davies, only my reason for doing so couldn't be further apart from yours haha

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Mark Davies

Post by TANGODANCER » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:16 pm

Well then, I hope the players have a bitmore conviction. For now I'll settle for .... COME ON YOU WHITES.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:26 pm

I'm sure we'd all sell him for £50m, so it's just haggling. Tango, you've said yourself many times that we're not the richest club in the world. Every player has his price - ask Cristiano Ronaldo, Fergie and David Gill. If true, West Brom bidding £4m would be neither insultingly low nor arm-rippingly high.

newcarsmell
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:07 am
Location: Makes Megson Look Like Mourinho.. Owen Owen Coyle

Re: Mark Davies

Post by newcarsmell » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:27 pm

One of the senior management told me ( and others ) personally that Mark Davies would be unlikely to feature in Boltons' starting eleven because the computer program they use to pick the team says he's considerably more effective coming on as sub for the last 20 minutes.

Bizarrely, he's been in the starting eleven almost every game since...

My point is though, I got the impression they didn't rate him too highly.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3032
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by truewhite15 » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:32 pm

They use a computer program to pick the team? Suddenly an awful lot makes sense...

Mark Davies would be in every single starting 11 I picked, providing he was fit. But then, I'd be playing a 4-5-1...

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by boltonboris » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:34 pm

I imagine (unless he's taking the piss) that it's somethinjg more like a prozone programme, which updates the stats like dribbles made / completed / pass percentage / ground covered / tackles won / chances created etc.

And they use that to determine their 'best' team.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Il Pirate
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Il Pirate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:40 pm

I'm with the ballroom boy on this one. A man showing some sense in what's becoming an asylum for the hysterical.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:41 pm

On the commentary on Citeh/Liverpool last night on radio5 Lawro was saying that he rarely asked Dalgleish about Liverpool these days after he started making up stories, and presumably laughing when Lawro repeated them on TV/radio.

You're a player/manager/CEO/director of a club are you really going to just spill the beans to average joe? I hope not, unless it's me, I'm discreet :wink:

EDIT: however it's entirely possible that Lawro made that story up so as not to keep getting asked about Dalgleish.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

Athers
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3350
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Manchester

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Athers » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:41 pm

Davies if born Spanish would be playing central midfield in a 4-3-3 for someone over there, but I fear because he's playing here and scrapping in the bottom half, he'll always be shoved out wide in a 4-4-2...

Also I'm sure I saw on WhoScored.com that he has our best passing % and if we didn't have him I suspect we'd see even less of the ball [anywhere than at the back four's feet] than we seem to now.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
irie Cee Bee
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:55 am

Re: Mark Davies

Post by irie Cee Bee » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:16 pm

Not interested West brom..we absolutely need him at this moment. Check back in the summer if we are relegated.. 6 million would do it.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Hoboh » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:19 pm

newcarsmell wrote:One of the senior management told me ( and others ) personally that Mark Davies would be unlikely to feature in Boltons' starting eleven because the computer program they use to pick the team says he's considerably more effective coming on as sub for the last 20 minutes.

Bizarrely, he's been in the starting eleven almost every game since...

My point is though, I got the impression they didn't rate him too highly.
Soooo we are still running windows 95 then?

Gail Platz
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:22 pm

Re: Mark Davies

Post by Gail Platz » Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:06 pm

There's some good points both in favour of, and against Mark Davies. I'm a fan of his, I think he's a good player but as a couple of people have pointed out he doesn't really fit into a 4-4-2.

In my opinion his best position is the centre midfield attacker in a 5-man midfield, he's brilliant at running into the box with the ball and out of all of our fit players at the moment, he's the only one that knows how to take a first touch without the ball drifting about 10 yards away from his feet.

£4m would be a good piece of business if Holden was fit but at the moment I don't think we're in a position to be selling players like him.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: irie Cee Bee and 34 guests