Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
the name's Ream!Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
That said, the badge and club will always override any representative, and we fight on. Let's hope - pray - that Coyle spends the money wisely and we get to see more Premier League-quality defenders in the beloved shirt.

Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
So we should have £4.5m left to spend of the Cahill money if Ream did actually cost £2.5m then. Doesn't really go very far these days I'm afraid...
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Not sure where this article came from, but somebody just e-mailed me this:
In a season of flux it is good that some things never change: Sir Alex Ferguson moaning about referees; Phil Dowd getting important decisions wrong; and Zat Knight being culpable. At 6ft 6in and with more than 250 games of Premier League experience Knight should be an imposing, commanding defender but, as his performance against Manchester United testified, he tends to be the opposite.
He was lucky to stay on the pitch for the full 90 minutes – he should have been sent off after giving away a penalty for a challenge on Danny Welbeck, who was through on goal – and even though he did stay on, he attempted only two tackles, both of which failed. His partner in the heart of the Bolton defence, David Wheater, made eight and failed with only two.
Bolton have conceded more goals than any team this season and continuing to play Knight, in this form, is not going to solve that problem.
With these problems in mind, why have Bolton agreed to sell their best defender to Chelsea? Even though Gary Cahill is not at his peak this season, he is clearly better than Knight and perhaps could have formed a decent partnership with Wheater, who has been on a winning side in the league more times than Knight this season despite playing only half as many games.
The club would argue that selling Cahill now means they get a transfer fee that would not be available in the summer but surely retaining Cahill would have given Bolton a better chance of avoiding relegation and the financial loss that would entail, which would amount to a lot more than £7m. Cahill was under contract at Bolton and they did not have to let him go. Come May they may pay for their short-termism.
Raises some interesting points, especially the bit in bold
In a season of flux it is good that some things never change: Sir Alex Ferguson moaning about referees; Phil Dowd getting important decisions wrong; and Zat Knight being culpable. At 6ft 6in and with more than 250 games of Premier League experience Knight should be an imposing, commanding defender but, as his performance against Manchester United testified, he tends to be the opposite.
He was lucky to stay on the pitch for the full 90 minutes – he should have been sent off after giving away a penalty for a challenge on Danny Welbeck, who was through on goal – and even though he did stay on, he attempted only two tackles, both of which failed. His partner in the heart of the Bolton defence, David Wheater, made eight and failed with only two.
Bolton have conceded more goals than any team this season and continuing to play Knight, in this form, is not going to solve that problem.
With these problems in mind, why have Bolton agreed to sell their best defender to Chelsea? Even though Gary Cahill is not at his peak this season, he is clearly better than Knight and perhaps could have formed a decent partnership with Wheater, who has been on a winning side in the league more times than Knight this season despite playing only half as many games.
The club would argue that selling Cahill now means they get a transfer fee that would not be available in the summer but surely retaining Cahill would have given Bolton a better chance of avoiding relegation and the financial loss that would entail, which would amount to a lot more than £7m. Cahill was under contract at Bolton and they did not have to let him go. Come May they may pay for their short-termism.
Raises some interesting points, especially the bit in bold
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
yeah we all know he's bollocks
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
We couldn't block the Cahill sale. Not just for the £7m, but Coyle had promised the player the move, and the player had responded with determination. It would be a huge potential blow to squad morale if the manager's sweet-talk came to nothing.
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Weird feeling seeing cahill pic holding chelsea shirt. All the best, we shall remember your services.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Unavoaidable, and yet i kinda feel all hope of survival is now gone with him.
Cahill & Wheater = Yes
Knight & Wheater = No
Unless of course a good left back swoop is made and Ricketts can go into the middle (after getting his match fitness back).
Cahill & Wheater = Yes
Knight & Wheater = No
Unless of course a good left back swoop is made and Ricketts can go into the middle (after getting his match fitness back).
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
A very good player and we'll miss him.
However, I don't feel sad he's gone.
Selling him was our only chance of survival (we are going down as it stands with half a season of Cahill in the side), its up to Coyle now to use the money well........
However, I don't feel sad he's gone.
Selling him was our only chance of survival (we are going down as it stands with half a season of Cahill in the side), its up to Coyle now to use the money well........
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Could be an option when Alonso returns, but that depends on him proving Blackburn was the start of a trend rather than a fluke. Oh and Steinsson not proving just as howling a liability on the other side – OC could then promote Riley, although I'm yet to feel confident the manager will bench Zat Knight. Still, I suppose he's benched the captain...ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Unless of course a good left back swoop is made and Ricketts can go into the middle
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
oh yeah - Alonso!
what was it? two reasonably promising games - then another injury??
here's the current picture according to physioroom...
J Jaaskelainen Hip/Thigh Injury no return date
M Alonso Ankle/Foot Injury 21st Jan 12 very doubtful
R Gardner Hip/Thigh Injury no return date
T Mears Broken Leg 4th Feb 12
C Lee Broken Leg May 12
S Holden Knee Injury Mar 12
S Davis Knee Injury 21st Jan 12 very doubtful (what - AGAIN???)

what was it? two reasonably promising games - then another injury??
here's the current picture according to physioroom...
J Jaaskelainen Hip/Thigh Injury no return date
M Alonso Ankle/Foot Injury 21st Jan 12 very doubtful
R Gardner Hip/Thigh Injury no return date

T Mears Broken Leg 4th Feb 12
C Lee Broken Leg May 12
S Holden Knee Injury Mar 12
S Davis Knee Injury 21st Jan 12 very doubtful (what - AGAIN???)
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Cahill: "My spell with Bolton enabled me to break into the England squad. I would particularly like to thank the fans for their support."
Warms ya cockles, don't it?
Warms ya cockles, don't it?
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Sorry to see him leave, good luck and all.
But we have our replacement, in Ream.
P.s. New Jan Calendar page released
But we have our replacement, in Ream.
P.s. New Jan Calendar page released
- Attachments
-
- Ream Deal!
- IMAG01061.jpg (99.35 KiB) Viewed 2046 times
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Cahill & Davies on the January page...
KD is a sure thing for a transfer....
KD is a sure thing for a transfer....
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Interesting seeing that Lawro/Hanson didn't rate him, but Alan Green seems to. The media seems to be split on this.
I'm not surprised at all by GC talking about our fans. A high-class individual!
I'm not surprised at all by GC talking about our fans. A high-class individual!
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
If he played for Man Utd or Liverpool, they'd say he was World-Class
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
now he plays for chelsea - we'll see...boltonboris wrote:If he played for Man Utd or Liverpool, they'd say he was World-Class
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Yes quite a few pundits doubting him, but the only games I imagine they've watched us this season will be the ones where we got panned off Chelsea and United, and where Yakubu turned him at Ewood.
http://www.twitter.com/dan_athers" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
He'll be under much less pressure playing for Chelsea (they attack more than they defend, fancy that??!). Therefore he won't be called into action every 2 minutes. Which means less errors, (many, many less!)
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Official Gary Cahill transfer thread
Indeed, Bozzer. And he'll get a lot more kudos when he's tidying up behind John Terry than Zat Knight.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests