The penalties thread.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: The penalties thread.
Whats that got to do with biscuits??FaninOz wrote:As I have said many times before , referee decisions win most games. Penalties given/not given, freekicks the same and red/yellow cards the same. The inconsistency is still astounding and the lack of the use of cameras and technology over the whole field is also quite astounding. Even then its not always posible to get the decisions 100% right but al least with the use of technology they would be able to get 99% right in a very short length of time that wouldn't hold the game up too much.
But doing as Tango suggested in his original post wouldn't work and would create more problems than is solved.
Now getting rid of the offside rule would be a different matter, that would be a good move!!

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14516
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The penalties thread.
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Whats that got to do with biscuits??FaninOz wrote:As I have said many times before , referee decisions win most games. Penalties given/not given, freekicks the same and red/yellow cards the same. The inconsistency is still astounding and the lack of the use of cameras and technology over the whole field is also quite astounding. Even then its not always posible to get the decisions 100% right but al least with the use of technology they would be able to get 99% right in a very short length of time that wouldn't hold the game up too much.
But doing as Tango suggested in his original post wouldn't work and would create more problems than is solved.
Now getting rid of the offside rule would be a different matter, that would be a good move!!
No it wouldn't!!! It'd make a mockery of every match. You'd need to be playing 20 a side!
You don't half see some shit on these boards
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: The penalties thread.
I guess you're just a regular guy...Lord Kangana wrote:I suppose I'll be marked out as a pariah for saying I like Fig Rolls.

My daughter gets through 3 packets of fig rolls a week!
middle son - custard creams
eldest - chocolate chip cookies
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: The penalties thread.
Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
Re: The penalties thread.
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8578
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:18 pm
- Location: Mid Sussex
Re: The penalties thread.
Not funny. Sexist pigs.thebish wrote:ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31704
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The penalties thread.
Sexist figs?
Get rid of offside and you wouldn't have free-flowing football: defences would retreat, not advance. You'd end up with massive long-ball hoofs between mini-games of five-a-side on each goal-line, contested by brawn rather than brain. And before anybody says that'd be fun, it wouldn't, it'd be shit.
Get rid of offside and you wouldn't have free-flowing football: defences would retreat, not advance. You'd end up with massive long-ball hoofs between mini-games of five-a-side on each goal-line, contested by brawn rather than brain. And before anybody says that'd be fun, it wouldn't, it'd be shit.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The penalties thread.
It's getting rid of the "ladies" ( big soft Jessies) in mens' football, that scream and thresh about in the box like they've been attacked by hyenas that it's all about. Matter of fact most ladies teams are a lot less soft than some of the men. I'm as well aware as the next man that penalties will never be got rid of, but the whole point of the first post was being sick of cheating. The game's being ruined by it. Something needs doing.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The penalties thread.
Clockwork. I could pass a bus on demand.thebish wrote:I guess you're just a regular guy...Lord Kangana wrote:I suppose I'll be marked out as a pariah for saying I like Fig Rolls.![]()
My daughter gets through 3 packets of fig rolls a week!
middle son - custard creams
eldest - chocolate chip cookies
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: The penalties thread.
TANGODANCER wrote:It's getting rid of the "ladies" ( big soft Jessies) in mens' football, that scream and thresh about in the box like they've been attacked by hyenas that it's all about. Matter of fact most ladies teams are a lot less soft than some of the men. I'm as well aware as the next man that penalties will never be got rid of, but the whole point of the first post was being sick of cheating. The game's being ruined by it. Something needs doing.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
So do you actually think penalties should be banned from the game? I'm confused...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The penalties thread.
No, you're not, you're an wonderful chap and you don't do confused just like I don't do provocative posts.thebish wrote:TANGODANCER wrote:It's getting rid of the "ladies" ( big soft Jessies) in mens' football, that scream and thresh about in the box like they've been attacked by hyenas that it's all about. Matter of fact most ladies teams are a lot less soft than some of the men. I'm as well aware as the next man that penalties will never be got rid of, but the whole point of the first post was being sick of cheating. The game's being ruined by it. Something needs doing.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
So do you actually think penalties should be banned from the game? I'm confused...


Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The penalties thread.
I did - but you only read the biscuits bit...TANGODANCER wrote:No, you're not, you're an wonderful chap and you don't do confused just like I don't do provocative posts.thebish wrote:TANGODANCER wrote:It's getting rid of the "ladies" ( big soft Jessies) in mens' football, that scream and thresh about in the box like they've been attacked by hyenas that it's all about. Matter of fact most ladies teams are a lot less soft than some of the men. I'm as well aware as the next man that penalties will never be got rid of, but the whole point of the first post was being sick of cheating. The game's being ruined by it. Something needs doing.ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Lets get rid of tackling, penalties and offside.
OR
just follow ladies' football ?
So do you actually think penalties should be banned from the game? I'm confused...Why not express a view of your own maybe on solutions to cheating? Or you could just talk about biscuits.
I am confused about whether you think penalties should be banned. We agree that they won't - but that's not the same as thinking they should - which is what you originally said... (bizarrely - if that's not what you think..)
Re: The penalties thread.
No it wouldn't it would just spread the game out rather than 20 players all crowding together like kids football. Also, you would not have forwards just standing on the goal line waiting for the ball either. Many offsides are so marginal, and many decisions are so wrong that it just shows that its a law thant needs changing.boltonboris wrote:ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Whats that got to do with biscuits??FaninOz wrote:As I have said many times before , referee decisions win most games. Penalties given/not given, freekicks the same and red/yellow cards the same. The inconsistency is still astounding and the lack of the use of cameras and technology over the whole field is also quite astounding. Even then its not always posible to get the decisions 100% right but al least with the use of technology they would be able to get 99% right in a very short length of time that wouldn't hold the game up too much.
But doing as Tango suggested in his original post wouldn't work and would create more problems than is solved.
Now getting rid of the offside rule would be a different matter, that would be a good move!!
No it wouldn't!!! It'd make a mockery of every match. You'd need to be playing 20 a side!
You don't half see some shit on these boards
Also mate just because you don't agree doesn't make it a shit idea, just a different perception of how the game could be changed for the better.
As to diving, yes retrospective punishments with long suspensions would help to get rid of it.
Last edited by FaninOz on Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: The penalties thread.
FaninOz wrote:No it wouldn't it would just spread the game out rather than 20 players all crowding together like kids football. Also, you would not have forwards just standing on the goal line waiting for the ball either. Many offsides are so marginal, and many decisions are so wrong that it just shows that its a law thant needs changing.boltonboris wrote:ohjimmyjimmy wrote:Whats that got to do with biscuits??FaninOz wrote:As I have said many times before , referee decisions win most games. Penalties given/not given, freekicks the same and red/yellow cards the same. The inconsistency is still astounding and the lack of the use of cameras and technology over the whole field is also quite astounding. Even then its not always posible to get the decisions 100% right but al least with the use of technology they would be able to get 99% right in a very short length of time that wouldn't hold the game up too much.
But doing as Tango suggested in his original post wouldn't work and would create more problems than is solved.
Now getting rid of the offside rule would be a different matter, that would be a good move!!
No it wouldn't!!! It'd make a mockery of every match. You'd need to be playing 20 a side!
You don't half see some shit on these boards
Also mate just because you don't agree doesn't make it a shit idea, just a different perception of how the game could be changed for the better.
As to diving, yes retrospective punishments with long suspensions would help to get rid of it.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED
Re: The penalties thread.
Banning offsides is a shit idea though. As stated previously, it'd end up with the ball just being smashed from one end to the other. Attackers would push higher and higher up field, and defenders would have to drop deeper and deeper to go with them, which leaves packed out penalty areas at either end and not a lot inbetween. There'd be no place for fast players, and the only skill rewarded would be the ability to win headers.
Re: The penalties thread.
would suit us down to the ground, then - and give a landscape for KD to be reborn into!!jimbo wrote:Banning offsides is a shit idea though. As stated previously, it'd end up with the ball just being smashed from one end to the other. Attackers would push higher and higher up field, and defenders would have to drop deeper and deeper to go with them, which leaves packed out penalty areas at either end and not a lot inbetween. There'd be no place for fast players, and the only skill rewarded would be the ability to win headers.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The penalties thread.
Is that a match report?jimbo wrote:Banning offsides is a shit idea though. As stated previously, it'd end up with the ball just being smashed from one end to the other. Attackers would push higher and higher up field, and defenders would have to drop deeper and deeper to go with them, which leaves packed out penalty areas at either end and not a lot inbetween. There'd be no place for fast players, and the only skill rewarded would be the ability to win headers.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The penalties thread.
While we're banning offsides and penalties, why not go the whole hog and use a couple of jumpers for goalposts, and get rid of official kits, playing shirts v skins instead?
Re: The penalties thread.
Do away with refs for a trial period, say half a season, just have linesmen for throw ins and offsides. Any punch ups allow the bench/managers to join in. All tackles legal.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The penalties thread.
And have no sides to the pitch - that was ace when you could just keep legging it across the park to stop someone getting the ball off of you. Time to smash a few stands down, me thinksjimbo wrote:While we're banning offsides and penalties, why not go the whole hog and use a couple of jumpers for goalposts, and get rid of official kits, playing shirts v skins instead?

May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests