Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
^ is the right answer!officer_dibble wrote:
i have a feeling we might get beat!
royal dicking by minnows on the way!!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
http://www.wiziwig.tv/broadcast.php?mat ... art=sports" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wiziwig say they are 4 channels that our said to be showing the game
Wiziwig say they are 4 channels that our said to be showing the game
NEIL LENNON'S SUPERWHITE ARMY
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
wtf is wiziwig? im thinking itv or espn!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1276
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 8:07 pm
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
its like myp2p, they show whos streaming what gamesofficer_dibble wrote:wtf is wiziwig? im thinking itv or espn!
NEIL LENNON'S SUPERWHITE ARMY
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Thanks for that. I saw Mypp2 got binned and have been using first row sports which isn't half as good.Tals-biggest-fan wrote:its like myp2p, they show whos streaming what gamesofficer_dibble wrote:wtf is wiziwig? im thinking itv or espn!
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:55 pm
- Location: 10500+ Miles from the Reebok.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
thebish wrote:^ is the right answer!officer_dibble wrote:
i have a feeling we might get beat!
royal dicking by minnows on the way!!
I wanted to bet on The Macc Lads winning!

- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Anyone wanna post their ideal and predicted teams?
Think I'd go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley..Wheater..Ricketts..Robinson
.............Pratley...Muamba.............
Eagles...........Tuncay...........Petrov
.....................Klasnic.....................
There's some players in there who really, really need to show they shouldn't be shelved. Tempted to try Boyata somewhere but more important to give Riley experience and Ricketts game-time in the middle. Bench to include Mavies/KD/Ngog for emergency (yep, we've nobody else to ask) but also kids in case we're safe (ha!).
Think Coyle will go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley...Wheater...Knight...Robinson
.............Pratley...Reo-Coker..........
Eagles.................................Petrov
.............Klasnic, K Davies.............
He does love a 4-4-2, doesn't he? Have you noticed? And to be honest there's a strong case for playing it at home to weaker teams, and Macc are presumably going to be the weakest team we play all year, but what new are we going to learn about the 4-4-2 with Kev'n'Ivan? Anyway, most important thing is the win, which would make it one loss in five - as opposed to the humbling home humping, which would be A Very Bad Thing Indeed...
Think I'd go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley..Wheater..Ricketts..Robinson
.............Pratley...Muamba.............
Eagles...........Tuncay...........Petrov
.....................Klasnic.....................
There's some players in there who really, really need to show they shouldn't be shelved. Tempted to try Boyata somewhere but more important to give Riley experience and Ricketts game-time in the middle. Bench to include Mavies/KD/Ngog for emergency (yep, we've nobody else to ask) but also kids in case we're safe (ha!).
Think Coyle will go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley...Wheater...Knight...Robinson
.............Pratley...Reo-Coker..........
Eagles.................................Petrov
.............Klasnic, K Davies.............
He does love a 4-4-2, doesn't he? Have you noticed? And to be honest there's a strong case for playing it at home to weaker teams, and Macc are presumably going to be the weakest team we play all year, but what new are we going to learn about the 4-4-2 with Kev'n'Ivan? Anyway, most important thing is the win, which would make it one loss in five - as opposed to the humbling home humping, which would be A Very Bad Thing Indeed...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Quite simply, Kevin Davies and Klasnic should never, ever ever ever ever ever be played together up front again.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Anyone wanna post their ideal and predicted teams?
Think I'd go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley..Wheater..Ricketts..Robinson
.............Pratley...Muamba.............
Eagles...........Tuncay...........Petrov
.....................Klasnic.....................
There's some players in there who really, really need to show they shouldn't be shelved. Tempted to try Boyata somewhere but more important to give Riley experience and Ricketts game-time in the middle. Bench to include Mavies/KD/Ngog for emergency (yep, we've nobody else to ask) but also kids in case we're safe (ha!).
Think Coyle will go
....................Bogdan....................
Riley...Wheater...Knight...Robinson
.............Pratley...Reo-Coker..........
Eagles.................................Petrov
.............Klasnic, K Davies.............
He does love a 4-4-2, doesn't he? Have you noticed? And to be honest there's a strong case for playing it at home to weaker teams, and Macc are presumably going to be the weakest team we play all year, but what new are we going to learn about the 4-4-2 with Kev'n'Ivan? Anyway, most important thing is the win, which would make it one loss in five - as opposed to the humbling home humping, which would be A Very Bad Thing Indeed...
It doesn't work. We've seen that well enough.
Never.
Ever.
Ever.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Well, quite. But I'd be really rather surprised if they're not at it again in five hours' time.BWFC_Insane wrote:Quite simply, Kevin Davies and Klasnic should never, ever ever ever ever ever be played together up front again.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Well thanks for that. And it'll be cold too.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Well, quite. But I'd be really rather surprised if they're not at it again in five hours' time.BWFC_Insane wrote:Quite simply, Kevin Davies and Klasnic should never, ever ever ever ever ever be played together up front again.
Really looking forwards to it now...

Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
I'd like us just to play the team that played on Saturday. Riley and Tuncay in for Eagles and Steinsson if totally neccesary.
Just don't see how it benefits anyone to see us toil away for 70 mins before bringing on N'Gog and Davies. I've seen more than enough from Pratley thanks.
Just don't see how it benefits anyone to see us toil away for 70 mins before bringing on N'Gog and Davies. I've seen more than enough from Pratley thanks.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
I'll be there. Can get a train from here in the peaks (Whaley Bridge) right through to Horwich so that's handy. It's been flippin freezing here all day, I imagine it'll be just as cold up in Lancashire!
I hope Tuncay doesn't play, I think he played right wing against Villa (my only other Reebok trip this season) and was offside about 6 times through sheer laziness / shitness. Idiot.
I hope Tuncay doesn't play, I think he played right wing against Villa (my only other Reebok trip this season) and was offside about 6 times through sheer laziness / shitness. Idiot.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Yo. Really, pay on the door, super. Got back last night from a stint abroad and ready for some footie. Leaving in my car in half an hour. Which end will be the aways? I want to avoid a couple of Maccies that might be (most probably will be) there.boltonboris wrote:Yes, you can. For a jeff KennaCrazyHorse wrote:Does anyone know for definite if you can pay on the door for this tonight or not?
http://www.bwfc.co.uk/page/TicketInform ... 49,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
The Axman wrote:Yo. Really, pay on the door, super. Got back last night from a stint abroad and ready for some footie. Leaving in my car in half an hour. Which end will be the aways? I want to avoid a couple of Maccies that might be (most probably will be) there.boltonboris wrote:Yes, you can. For a jeff KennaCrazyHorse wrote:Does anyone know for definite if you can pay on the door for this tonight or not?
http://www.bwfc.co.uk/page/TicketInform ... 49,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
South Stand is the away end. They may still spot you in the 'Crowd' though.

- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
As a tenner-paying customer, you have the right to request a decent side. As a multimillion-paying football club, BWFC have the obligation to prioritise games and rotate playing staff, while hopefully also finding out how the juddering chuff one is supposed to use a Pratley.Tombwfc wrote:I'd like us just to play the team that played on Saturday. Riley and Tuncay in for Eagles and Steinsson if totally neccesary. Just don't see how it benefits anyone to see us toil away for 70 mins before bringing on N'Gog and Davies. I've seen more than enough from Pratley thanks.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:23 pm
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
aren the top of the west and east stands open?
-
- Promising
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:20 pm
- Location: Bolton
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
No. Lower only. Not much left.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
When OC's 4-4-2 goes wrong (we're not closing down, there's no movement, no-one wants the ball in midfield, lumping up to strikers doesn't work) then a change is needed and Pratley does at least offer movement, and when I've seen us play him we've managed to pass it a bit and make a chance or two after he's come on. We had been dire before that point though, and perhaps it was Pratley and a change of system that helped, not just Pratley.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:As a tenner-paying customer, you have the right to request a decent side. As a multimillion-paying football club, BWFC have the obligation to prioritise games and rotate playing staff, while hopefully also finding out how the juddering chuff one is supposed to use a Pratley.Tombwfc wrote:I'd like us just to play the team that played on Saturday. Riley and Tuncay in for Eagles and Steinsson if totally neccesary. Just don't see how it benefits anyone to see us toil away for 70 mins before bringing on N'Gog and Davies. I've seen more than enough from Pratley thanks.
I think the Pratley debate is more a formation/personnel/OC debate but you're all sick of those debates so you've turned on someone.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Armchair Wanderer wrote:When OC's 4-4-2 goes wrong (we're not closing down, there's no movement, no-one wants the ball in midfield, lumping up to strikers doesn't work) then a change is needed and Pratley does at least offer movement, and when I've seen us play him we've managed to pass it a bit and make a chance or two after he's come on. We had been dire before that point though, and perhaps it was Pratley and a change of system that helped, not just Pratley.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:As a tenner-paying customer, you have the right to request a decent side. As a multimillion-paying football club, BWFC have the obligation to prioritise games and rotate playing staff, while hopefully also finding out how the juddering chuff one is supposed to use a Pratley.Tombwfc wrote:I'd like us just to play the team that played on Saturday. Riley and Tuncay in for Eagles and Steinsson if totally neccesary. Just don't see how it benefits anyone to see us toil away for 70 mins before bringing on N'Gog and Davies. I've seen more than enough from Pratley thanks.
I think the Pratley debate is more a formation/personnel/OC debate but you're all sick of those debates so you've turned on someone.
So does a headless chicken.
Re: Wanderers vs Macclesfield: The Threequel
Put them all on?CrazyHorse wrote:Cheers.
Am I blind or daft or both cos I couldn't find that link on the bwfc site before.
Reet, next question. Scarf, gloves and woollen hat or sunglasses, Burmuda shorts and a t-shirt?
Pfffft.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: knobpolisher, LHwhite and 42 guests