QPR thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: QPR thread

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:49 pm

Sponge wrote:
clapton is god wrote:There was one piece of skill yesterday that raised the first collective in-take of breath I've heard at the Reebok since Jay Jay was strutting his stuff. A long and high crossfield ball swirled in the wind and I swear it changed course three times as it made its way towards Petrov who actually had his back to the ball as he ran towards where it was heading. He then put a foot out and killed the ball stone dead as he took it totally in his stride. 'Oooh.' went all sides of the ground and there was a short ripple of applause only interrupted a couple of seconds later as his second clumsy touch took the ball over the by line.

Aye, that touch was sweet. Shame he then got over-excited and toe poked the ball into the hoarding.
same could of been said of Ngog with that little chip around clint hill fantasic bit of skill and awarness

but his shot was fvcking woeful
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: QPR thread

Post by thebish » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:51 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
Sponge wrote:
clapton is god wrote:There was one piece of skill yesterday that raised the first collective in-take of breath I've heard at the Reebok since Jay Jay was strutting his stuff. A long and high crossfield ball swirled in the wind and I swear it changed course three times as it made its way towards Petrov who actually had his back to the ball as he ran towards where it was heading. He then put a foot out and killed the ball stone dead as he took it totally in his stride. 'Oooh.' went all sides of the ground and there was a short ripple of applause only interrupted a couple of seconds later as his second clumsy touch took the ball over the by line.

Aye, that touch was sweet. Shame he then got over-excited and toe poked the ball into the hoarding.
same could of been said of Ngog with that little chip around clint hill fantasic bit of skill and awarness

but his shot was fvcking woeful
aye - like SWP at the other end... can't help thinking we dodged a very expensive bullet there...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: QPR thread

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:07 pm

Talking of woeful shots, Wheater had a crack late on that actually gained more in height than it did length. Earlier on he'd tried to get a header in but clearly his head's the shape of a Sheriff's badge! :?
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24831
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:54 am

Petrov...Jay Jay. Wash your mouth out. Soft cnut have given up and turned his back on it. Technically brilliant but it's no fecking use when you're soft as shite. At least two 50-50 he completely bottled AGAIN.

And Wheater isn't great but still can't understand anyone who even compares him with Knight!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

The Axman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by The Axman » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:50 am

William the White wrote:
Armchair Wanderer wrote:
officer_dibble wrote:Aye good subs by coyle, but
1. Muamba should of started. Pratley way off pace and lucky to not get a second booking.
2. he thinks we won cos of 442.
3. Where the feck has klasnicbeen? I like ngog but he doesnt score. klasnic =goals.

hughes can fcuk off - 1 decision each.
What was the formation after Klazza came on, was he dropped deeper or was it your standard 4-4-2?
He was a little deeper, then in the right place, and then it was feckin mayhem trying to keep the ball anywhere but our penalty area with very little sign of a 'system'...

My own contribution - which may have been crucial - was to shout very sweary words at the grass and all upon it and call upon several gods, none of which I believe in...

I'm not sure which of these strategies worked...
It was the calling upon several gods strategy. I was doing it too. I think we set up a karmic resonance when we both hit on Loki at the same moment, because Klasnic does actually worship at his shrine...

The Axman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by The Axman » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:17 am

Can’t be arsed reading through 22 pages of thread so I apologise if I cover anything already done to death…but DID THAT REALLY HAPPEN. But really we were a bit lucky. Haha.
Didn’t everyone in the ground, apart from the ref, the small round bloke in blue running the line, and the huge smelly fat slob in front of me who put away more calories during the match than I do in a year (you know who you are), know that that was a goal. Heehee.
I liked the baiting chant afterwards (was that us taunting them, or them complaining about the iniquity of the scoreline?) HoHoho.
Observations: I thought Pratley was going to get sent off, doesn’t he know how to tackle? I thought he was awful, and then he calmly occupies a spot in acres/hectares of space and coolly nods one in. heehee.
I thought Ngog was next to useless. I thought Klasnic was good, and I think he should be played much much much more than he is.
In summary: Yo. Haha.

calcalstar
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 10:01 am
Location: Mansfield, Notts

Re: QPR thread

Post by calcalstar » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:00 am

For me Coyle needed to adopt the Wenger "I didn't see it" stance, that would have tipped Hughes over the edge, I could just have seen his head boil and explode!

Il Pirate
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:27 pm
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: QPR thread

Post by Il Pirate » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:12 am

Sorry if mentioned earlier; but for all Hughes's and the rest moaning, particularly those tw*ts who steal a living on MOTD as 'analysts', the goal that wasn't was preceded by a corner that wasn't. It was a goal kick, & if that had been awarded as it should have been, there would be no debate about phantom goals. And as for that nice person Lawro, 'I think QPR will stay up'. Feck off.

The Axman
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1032
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:42 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by The Axman » Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:28 am

Il Pirate wrote:Sorry if mentioned earlier; but for all Hughes's and the rest moaning, particularly those tw*ts who steal a living on MOTD as 'analysts', the goal that wasn't was preceded by a corner that wasn't. It was a goal kick, & if that had been awarded as it should have been, there would be no debate about phantom goals. And as for that tw*t Lawro, 'I think QPR will stay up'. Feck off.
Really? It wasn't a corner? That alters the whole nature of debate.

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: QPR thread

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:07 pm

By line technology for corner decisions. Thats whats needed. To be honest I cant believe theyre still moaning about poor QPR on radio 5 after two days. Yes its a goal but it wasnt a corner and the officials evened it up by turning a blind one for the equalizer. It was an even game and for once we nicked it.The general media concensus that bolton deserve nothing but Green bile sucks.First against the wall come the revolution

User avatar
irie Cee Bee
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1383
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:55 am

Re: QPR thread

Post by irie Cee Bee » Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:29 pm

Great 3 points. When Boggers made that brilliant "save", I thought to myself, our luck is about to change and it did. Long it continues.

Credit to OC. he had the guts to play Pratley and it worked. He had the guts to go 4-4-2 at the risk of being slaugthered by us fans if it failed.. and it worked.

As far as playing 4-4-2 from the start...naw. We need Holden to do that. RC and Moo together give us nothing going forward in that formation. Our forwards and wingers would be starved. Changing it up in a game is fine, but keep it tight from the start. We are in a scrap. Nuff said.

coffeymagic
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 934
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:18 pm
Location: east kilbride
Contact:

Re: QPR thread

Post by coffeymagic » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:16 pm

Tell you what made me laugh. When the teams came out for the second half the linesman walked around the QPR goal and started checking the net like they do.

I can't lip read but the pointing and general body language of the QPR goalie was easy to translate.

'You just worry about getting your ****ing decisions right'

Something else aswell, one of my fondest memories of Mark Hughes was him getting a player sent off in Europe. I think it may have been against Nantes - Hughes went down clutching his face, rolling around in the dirt like a floundering seal when TV replays clearly showed no contact had been made between the United centre forward and the opposition player.

Ferguson defended his player of course claiming Hughes had done the right thing and was in fact 'defusing' the situation.

Get it up ya.
I'm not asking you to 'think outside the box' I just wish you'd have a rummage around in it once in a while.

http://www.coffeymagic.blogspot.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
twitter @thetonycoffey

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:31 pm

"The other disappointing thing is for Alan Shearer to go and pick out one of our individual players - Zat Knight - which I thought was in really poor taste.
Coyle quote.

Now then I suppose our own manager singling out players for mistakes and poor performances after games is fine then? :conf:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: QPR thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:30 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
"The other disappointing thing is for Alan Shearer to go and pick out one of our individual players - Zat Knight - which I thought was in really poor taste.
Coyle quote.

Now then I suppose our own manager singling out players for mistakes and poor performances after games is fine then? :conf:
Isn't that what club managers are supposed to do? Different with somebody not associated with the club doing it but Oc's comment is right in my view. .
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: QPR thread

Post by bobo the clown » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:27 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:..... but Oc's comment is right in my view.
though, regretably, so was Shearers'.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

lovethesmellofnapalm
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 860
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by lovethesmellofnapalm » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:34 pm

irie Cee Bee wrote:Great 3 points. When Boggers made that brilliant "save", I thought to myself, our luck is about to change and it did. Long it continues.

Credit to OC. he had the guts to play Pratley and it worked. He had the guts to go 4-4-2 at the risk of being slaugthered by us fans if it failed.. and it worked.

As far as playing 4-4-2 from the start...naw. We need Holden to do that. RC and Moo together give us nothing going forward in that formation. Our forwards and wingers would be starved. Changing it up in a game is fine, but keep it tight from the start. We are in a scrap. Nuff said.
:D

difficult for QPR to replace w@nker Warnock like for like but they've made a decent fist of it in Hughes
his managerial stock seems to be in irretreviable decline
good
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"

lovethesmellofnapalm
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 860
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:53 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by lovethesmellofnapalm » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:35 pm

... and that post has absolutely feck all to do with the quote pasted
"A child of five would understand this- send someone to fetch a child of five"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38814
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:48 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
"The other disappointing thing is for Alan Shearer to go and pick out one of our individual players - Zat Knight - which I thought was in really poor taste.
Coyle quote.

Now then I suppose our own manager singling out players for mistakes and poor performances after games is fine then? :conf:
Isn't that what club managers are supposed to do? Different with somebody not associated with the club doing it but Oc's comment is right in my view. .
Completely the opposite. Pundits like Shearer are paid to make observations. If he can't pick out mistakes, what the hell is he going to waffle about?

Coyle as manager should deal with individual player issues in private and not single them out after games.

Shearer is not connected to the club, he owes our players nowt. Coyle does.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13655
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: QPR thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:50 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
"The other disappointing thing is for Alan Shearer to go and pick out one of our individual players - Zat Knight - which I thought was in really poor taste.
Coyle quote.

Now then I suppose our own manager singling out players for mistakes and poor performances after games is fine then? :conf:
Isn't that what club managers are supposed to do? Different with somebody not associated with the club doing it but Oc's comment is right in my view. .
Completely the opposite. Pundits like Shearer are paid to make observations. If he can't pick out mistakes, what the hell is he going to waffle about?

Coyle as manager should deal with individual player issues in private and not single them out after games.

Shearer is not connected to the club, he owes our players nowt. Coyle does.
Aye he helps some of them pretend they are footballers

Simon_BWFC
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 5:05 pm

Re: QPR thread

Post by Simon_BWFC » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:18 pm

QPR fans : fcuk big spiders............. :Jedi:
First Match: Sat 17 August 1974 BWFC v Portsmouth Won 3-0

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests