Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Locked
SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by SmokinFrazier » Sat Jun 23, 2012 8:42 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Lets not fall in to the trap of putting Muamba on a pedalo because of his recent unfortunate illness.
:D

I wondered if Frazier had an exception to his general (and quite welcome) all-round sunny outlook - slightly surprised to find it's Muamba...

I suppose a good way of looking at it is that Coyle unquestionably undervalued Muamba because he's *only* defensive - break-ups, tackles - while his creative abilities (passing, shooting) leave a lot to be desired.
I do like Muamba a lot but I just think he's limited. There's nothing wrong with that though! I mentioned Makalele earlier and those players are essential, albeit not as well rounded as someone like Viera.

4-5-1 is a good formation with Muamba but I don't think he fits into our 4-4-2. For that role, you need someone a bit more creative.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bobo the clown » Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:29 pm

SmokinFrazier wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Lord Kangana wrote:Lets not fall in to the trap of putting Muamba on a pedalo because of his recent unfortunate illness.
:D

I wondered if Frazier had an exception to his general (and quite welcome) all-round sunny outlook - slightly surprised to find it's Muamba...

I suppose a good way of looking at it is that Coyle unquestionably undervalued Muamba because he's *only* defensive - break-ups, tackles - while his creative abilities (passing, shooting) leave a lot to be desired.
I do like Muamba a lot but I just think he's limited. There's nothing wrong with that though! I mentioned Makalele earlier and those players are essential, albeit not as well rounded as someone like Viera.

4-5-1 is a good formation with Muamba but I don't think he fits into our 4-4-2. For that role, you need someone a bit more creative.
Or, when you have Moo and Mavis as two of the better players available .... not play 4-4-2 ?!?!?!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Loafer
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 5:58 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Loafer » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:05 pm

Well Harry Kewell is leaving Australia and heading back to England after an average season with Melbourne Victory here in the A-League.

There is talk he will play in the Championship.

clapton is god
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Worryingly close to Old Tr*fford.
Contact:

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by clapton is god » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:11 pm

Andrews not a done deal yet:

http://www.clicklancashire.com/sport/bo ... m=facebook" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:42 pm

I see Steven Naismith is going on a free transfer

Always look decent when iv seen him play IMO we need another striker plus he's useful on the wings
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by jaffka » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:27 pm

Kewell on trial at Blackburn, who are also after Danny Murphy and leon best

Wandering Willy
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4141
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Wandering Willy » Sun Jun 24, 2012 3:31 pm

Danny Murphy already signed I think.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:06 pm

jaffka wrote:Kewell on trial at Blackburn, who are also after Danny Murphy and leon best
Are you sure it's not Leon Best who's on trial ? Or is that still to come ?? :wink:

Mind you, Kewell should be in the dock having robbed a living on a Keiron Dyer scale for the past 5 or 6 years.

Danny Murphy ... yep, probably a good one at the level, but his back legs must be close to gone now.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:13 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:I see Steven Naismith is going on a free transfer
Not according to Rangers Nouveau, he isn't. They've transferred the player's registrations from the the old club to the new. (some of) The player's agents and solicitors are challenging the legalities of it. More messiness ensues!
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:25 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:I see Steven Naismith is going on a free transfer
Not according to Rangers Nouveau, he isn't. They've transferred the player's registrations from the the old club to the new. (some of) The player's agents and solicitors are challenging the legalities of it. More messiness ensues!

Good player none the less worth keeping an eye on the situation
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:32 pm

In normal employment terms it'd be the equivilant of a TUPE transfer. However, in "talent" contracts it's unlikely to be that simple.

In a TUPE you have the right to transfer & essentially keep your t&c's unchanged. However, you DO have the right to decline & leave. If Rangers Mk 1 have folded then their contracts will have ceased. It may get messy &, of course, I don't know the intricacies of individual contracts, but I'd expect a determined player could expect a decent lawyer to win their arguement.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by TKIZ! » Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:40 pm

clapton is god wrote:Andrews not a done deal yet:

http://www.clicklancashire.com/sport/bo ... m=facebook" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'd take everything that click Lancashire says with a pinch of salt
Pfffft.

RealLifeHobbit
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 8:39 pm
Location: Maidenhead

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by RealLifeHobbit » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:44 pm

thebish wrote:^
^
^
^

I think you've totally wanked up those quote marks - cos I didn't say that!! 8)
Yes, I'm really not doing well here am I... I do assume it is me you're talking to? :P

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by bobo the clown » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:54 pm

RealLifeHobbit wrote:
thebish wrote:^
^
^
^

I think you've totally wanked up those quote marks - cos I didn't say that!! 8)
Yes, I'm really not doing well here am I... I do assume it is me you're talking to? :P
No, it was me. I couldn't be arsed correcting it.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Puskas » Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:19 am

SmokinFrazier wrote:As much as I like Muamba, everything I said there was true.
Everything you said was true?

So there is no player in the Premier League - not a single one - who is worse at passing, at dribbling and at shooting (at least last season)?

If I recall correctly, didn't he have our best pass completion statistics at Opta a couple of years back?

I'm not sure about last season, but I would be _very_ surprised if he was bottom of everyone in the Premier League at passing, dribbling and shooting. Which is what you're claiming. Maybe if there's someone on this board who subscribes to Opta, we could get a definitive answer.

Let's face it, his shooting is wayward. He makes short, simple passes effectively. He can dribble with the ball (how many times have we seen him run with it into the box, before blasting at the corner flag?)

He isn't Cruyff. But neither is he Nicky Brookman. Sense of proportion here, that's all I'm asking for. It seems everything these days has to be either the best thing ever, or the worst. It's very rarely either.

Oh, and the idea that he can't play in a 442? I would ask - when, in recent years, has been our most effective period of playing 442? I'd suggest the season before last, from the start up to the ManU game and Holden's injury. And who, in that season, played alongside Holden in the 442 formation? I can't remember - can anyone help me out?
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

Porrohman
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 846
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:35 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Porrohman » Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:54 am

Nevermind all that shit have we signed anybody yet or not?
The voices in my head may not be real...but they have some great ideas!

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:23 pm

Puskas wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:As much as I like Muamba, everything I said there was true.
Everything you said was true?

So there is no player in the Premier League - not a single one - who is worse at passing, at dribbling and at shooting (at least last season)?

If I recall correctly, didn't he have our best pass completion statistics at Opta a couple of years back?

I'm not sure about last season, but I would be _very_ surprised if he was bottom of everyone in the Premier League at passing, dribbling and shooting. Which is what you're claiming. Maybe if there's someone on this board who subscribes to Opta, we could get a definitive answer.

Let's face it, his shooting is wayward. He makes short, simple passes effectively. He can dribble with the ball (how many times have we seen him run with it into the box, before blasting at the corner flag?)

He isn't Cruyff. But neither is he Nicky Brookman. Sense of proportion here, that's all I'm asking for. It seems everything these days has to be either the best thing ever, or the worst. It's very rarely either.

Oh, and the idea that he can't play in a 442? I would ask - when, in recent years, has been our most effective period of playing 442? I'd suggest the season before last, from the start up to the ManU game and Holden's injury. And who, in that season, played alongside Holden in the 442 formation? I can't remember - can anyone help me out?
As much as I like Muamba, everything you've said there is true.

Has his limitations, but actually it brightens some games up when he's 25 yards out with everyone shouting "SHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT"

If people are expecting him to play Hollywood balls, then they're probably watching the wrong team, but he generally wins it and moves it on to a white shirt (according to the Opta stats - buggered it I can recall where I put 'em), and occasionally bombs forwards with "much enthusiasm"

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:23 pm

Porrohman wrote:Nevermind all that shit have we signed anybody yet or not?
No, this thread is cursed.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by boltonboris » Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:27 pm

Stats are sometimes bollocks though.

I've seen Muamba come short for a defender and receive a 5 yard pass into his feet, only for him (under no pressure) to give it straight back at face height.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok

Post by Puskas » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:28 pm

boltonboris wrote:Stats are sometimes bollocks though.
What does that even mean?

Does it, perhaps, mean that you have a pre-conceived idea of what Muamba does, and when that is borne out by the statistics, you can say "Stats are sometimes bollocks", and relate how you once saw him cock-up badly, ignoring all the times he didn't?

Or does it mean something else? If so, what?

I'm always entertained by the arguments people make along the lines of "You can prove anything with statistics" - no you can't. And they're certainly more useful than taking atypical occurrences and suggesting they're the norm...
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dave the minion, Google [Bot] and 30 guests