Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Chrisfuuuuuuuuuuuuu I miss youuuuuu 

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
SteadyDr Hotdog wrote:Chrisfuuuuuuuuuuuuu I miss youuuuuu

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Haha! The Back to the Future reference in his last post really made me chuckle.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
I can see what you are getting at, but I do love how you have phrased that. The 'only' thing he has not managed to do is get enough points from football matches. Otherwise, a roaring success!Chrisfu wrote:I too am pretty peeved about the Portsmouth result... not so much other pre-season results, as I expected we'd hit our stride by the Portsmouth game. But to say Coyle has *no* long term strategy is off the mark. His first real aim was to ensure the stability of the club by slashing the wage bill, which he has done. Then, he replaces them with much cheaper and when possible, younger players that are (on paper at least) knocking on the door of a first-team place.bristol_Wanderer3 wrote:Have to say Im a bit worried about this season. Logically we should be one of the teams that challenge for automatic promotion....I cant think of a better team in this league, on paper.
The main issue to me is Coyle. He has made a long career out of moving from club to club every two years, and it is not until now that he is trying to do something long term. And I feel that it is that initial spark and enthusiasm that he brings to a new project that makes him successful. Once that goes he is what his talent (or lack of) makes him....an average manager (just as he was an average player). Gartside wants him to build the club as Allardyce did, but BSA was a good long term strategist whereas Coyle, now the initial breezy couple of years are over, appears to operate more in a game to game fantasy world of magnificent free flowing stylish football....without any backbone or long term vision whatsoever. Having said all of that, I dont necessarily think it was a mistake to stick with him, I think that was the best option available, a case of damned if we do, damned if we dont, but at least sticking with him does provide some stability.
Just like last season I will be watching games hoping that somehow we can prevail despite the manager, or hoping that Ive got it completely wrong and Coyle majestically leads us to a successful season (i.e. promotion), but with a deep rooted sense that it will not end well.
The only thing he hasn't managed to do yet is make that gel on the pitch, which realistically he has to do in competitive league games. He'll get the standard "let's see where we are come December" from the board. If we're doing shite, we shop around for someone else.
I'll stick my neck out and say that if we're not challenging for the a play-off place by the beginning of December that he'll be on his way, I have no doubts about that. Until then, the club need to stay calm and now take any silly risks by upsetting the apple cart right before the start of the season.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Prufrock wrote:I can see what you are getting at, but I do love how you have phrased that. The 'only' thing he has not managed to do is get enough points from football matches. Otherwise, a roaring success!Chrisfu wrote:I too am pretty peeved about the Portsmouth result... not so much other pre-season results, as I expected we'd hit our stride by the Portsmouth game. But to say Coyle has *no* long term strategy is off the mark. His first real aim was to ensure the stability of the club by slashing the wage bill, which he has done. Then, he replaces them with much cheaper and when possible, younger players that are (on paper at least) knocking on the door of a first-team place.bristol_Wanderer3 wrote:Have to say Im a bit worried about this season. Logically we should be one of the teams that challenge for automatic promotion....I cant think of a better team in this league, on paper.
The main issue to me is Coyle. He has made a long career out of moving from club to club every two years, and it is not until now that he is trying to do something long term. And I feel that it is that initial spark and enthusiasm that he brings to a new project that makes him successful. Once that goes he is what his talent (or lack of) makes him....an average manager (just as he was an average player). Gartside wants him to build the club as Allardyce did, but BSA was a good long term strategist whereas Coyle, now the initial breezy couple of years are over, appears to operate more in a game to game fantasy world of magnificent free flowing stylish football....without any backbone or long term vision whatsoever. Having said all of that, I dont necessarily think it was a mistake to stick with him, I think that was the best option available, a case of damned if we do, damned if we dont, but at least sticking with him does provide some stability.
Just like last season I will be watching games hoping that somehow we can prevail despite the manager, or hoping that Ive got it completely wrong and Coyle majestically leads us to a successful season (i.e. promotion), but with a deep rooted sense that it will not end well.
The only thing he hasn't managed to do yet is make that gel on the pitch, which realistically he has to do in competitive league games. He'll get the standard "let's see where we are come December" from the board. If we're doing shite, we shop around for someone else.
I'll stick my neck out and say that if we're not challenging for the a play-off place by the beginning of December that he'll be on his way, I have no doubts about that. Until then, the club need to stay calm and now take any silly risks by upsetting the apple cart right before the start of the season.

Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
We were, yeah, but that was a long time ago. Since then things with Dr. Hotdog have never been the same.Bruce Rioja wrote:SteadyDr Hotdog wrote:Chrisfuuuuuuuuuuuuu I miss youuuuuu
Well, apart from Birmingham away last March. I've still got the ticket in my wallet.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
To be fair I was referring to our pre-season when I wrote that, but point taken all the same.Prufrock wrote:I can see what you are getting at, but I do love how you have phrased that. The 'only' thing he has not managed to do is get enough points from football matches. Otherwise, a roaring success!Chrisfu wrote:I too am pretty peeved about the Portsmouth result... not so much other pre-season results, as I expected we'd hit our stride by the Portsmouth game. But to say Coyle has *no* long term strategy is off the mark. His first real aim was to ensure the stability of the club by slashing the wage bill, which he has done. Then, he replaces them with much cheaper and when possible, younger players that are (on paper at least) knocking on the door of a first-team place.bristol_Wanderer3 wrote:Have to say Im a bit worried about this season. Logically we should be one of the teams that challenge for automatic promotion....I cant think of a better team in this league, on paper.
The main issue to me is Coyle. He has made a long career out of moving from club to club every two years, and it is not until now that he is trying to do something long term. And I feel that it is that initial spark and enthusiasm that he brings to a new project that makes him successful. Once that goes he is what his talent (or lack of) makes him....an average manager (just as he was an average player). Gartside wants him to build the club as Allardyce did, but BSA was a good long term strategist whereas Coyle, now the initial breezy couple of years are over, appears to operate more in a game to game fantasy world of magnificent free flowing stylish football....without any backbone or long term vision whatsoever. Having said all of that, I dont necessarily think it was a mistake to stick with him, I think that was the best option available, a case of damned if we do, damned if we dont, but at least sticking with him does provide some stability.
Just like last season I will be watching games hoping that somehow we can prevail despite the manager, or hoping that Ive got it completely wrong and Coyle majestically leads us to a successful season (i.e. promotion), but with a deep rooted sense that it will not end well.
The only thing he hasn't managed to do yet is make that gel on the pitch, which realistically he has to do in competitive league games. He'll get the standard "let's see where we are come December" from the board. If we're doing shite, we shop around for someone else.
I'll stick my neck out and say that if we're not challenging for the a play-off place by the beginning of December that he'll be on his way, I have no doubts about that. Until then, the club need to stay calm and now take any silly risks by upsetting the apple cart right before the start of the season.
Least season was pure inconsistency which, bottom line, means that the team didn't gel. There was no real talisman on the field apart from NRK, who was more of a voice off the field than on it. You could argue that we still don't have a player with the sort of Nolan-esque presence on the field, which we desperately need to anchor the team from the middle and help the headless chickens maintain their shape.
My overall point was that it's a new season, new league, and a smattering of new players (hopefully with some new ones on the way). He's done it in this league before, I'm willing to wait and see if he can do it again.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Oh eh?! What was it that Nixon had to say about this?
Wanderers have offered Carlos Sanchez a take-it or leave-it deal to anchor their midfield this season. The highly-rated Colombia international has finally met with the club after flying in at the weekend but, with Owen Coyle desperate to land a ball-winner, he will not be given time to dwell on whether he wants to play at the Reebok. Tonight's BEN.

Wanderers have offered Carlos Sanchez a take-it or leave-it deal to anchor their midfield this season. The highly-rated Colombia international has finally met with the club after flying in at the weekend but, with Owen Coyle desperate to land a ball-winner, he will not be given time to dwell on whether he wants to play at the Reebok. Tonight's BEN.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:44 pm
- Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Nixon says he's eventually in the country now and Bolton apparently won't wait a long time for a decision for himBruce Rioja wrote:Oh eh?! What was it that Nixon had to say about this?![]()
Wanderers have offered Carlos Sanchez a take-it or leave-it deal to anchor their midfield this season. The highly-rated Colombia international has finally met with the club after flying in at the weekend but, with Owen Coyle desperate to land a ball-winner, he will not be given time to dwell on whether he wants to play at the Reebok. Tonight's BEN.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
DECEMBER!Chrisfu wrote:I too am pretty peeved about the Portsmouth result... not so much other pre-season results, as I expected we'd hit our stride by the Portsmouth game. But to say Coyle has *no* long term strategy is off the mark. His first real aim was to ensure the stability of the club by slashing the wage bill, which he has done. Then, he replaces them with much cheaper and when possible, younger players that are (on paper at least) knocking on the door of a first-team place.bristol_Wanderer3 wrote:Have to say Im a bit worried about this season. Logically we should be one of the teams that challenge for automatic promotion....I cant think of a better team in this league, on paper.
The main issue to me is Coyle. He has made a long career out of moving from club to club every two years, and it is not until now that he is trying to do something long term. And I feel that it is that initial spark and enthusiasm that he brings to a new project that makes him successful. Once that goes he is what his talent (or lack of) makes him....an average manager (just as he was an average player). Gartside wants him to build the club as Allardyce did, but BSA was a good long term strategist whereas Coyle, now the initial breezy couple of years are over, appears to operate more in a game to game fantasy world of magnificent free flowing stylish football....without any backbone or long term vision whatsoever. Having said all of that, I dont necessarily think it was a mistake to stick with him, I think that was the best option available, a case of damned if we do, damned if we dont, but at least sticking with him does provide some stability.
Just like last season I will be watching games hoping that somehow we can prevail despite the manager, or hoping that Ive got it completely wrong and Coyle majestically leads us to a successful season (i.e. promotion), but with a deep rooted sense that it will not end well.
The only thing he hasn't managed to do yet is make that gel on the pitch, which realistically he has to do in competitive league games. He'll get the standard "let's see where we are come December" from the board. If we're doing shite, we shop around for someone else.
I'll stick my neck out and say that if we're not challenging for the a play-off place by the beginning of December that he'll be on his way, I have no doubts about that. Until then, the club need to stay calm and now take any silly risks by upsetting the apple cart right before the start of the season.
He ain't getting anything like until December off me.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
I could use a laugh - give us your suggested replacement candidates. 

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
There's no point. There is no-one. Woe is us.Wandering Willy wrote:I could use a laugh - give us your suggested replacement candidates.
Actually, Graeme Souness is doing nothing.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
On a serious level - I think it was discussed elsewhere (DSB?) that it would be unlikely that Souness would come to us after past history.
Not sure I would be keen on someone who has warmed his arse on a pundit's sofa for a few years without working.
Not sure I would be keen on someone who has warmed his arse on a pundit's sofa for a few years without working.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
It was - I also mentioned it when the Bish originally suggested Souness. He was well miffed at the role of Mark Curtis (ex agent of G. Megson) in the process to replace Sammy Lee with (ultimately G. Megson).Wandering Willy wrote:On a serious level - I think it was discussed elsewhere (DSB?) that it would be unlikely that Souness would come to us after past history.
Not sure I would be keen on someone who has warmed his arse on a pundit's sofa for a few years without working.
He felt it was a stitch-up, which is why he withdrew his candidature.
So no, I don't think Souness would be very likely at all.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: The Abyss
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
I Agree Bobo, we can't afford to be pissing about this season, we need to hit the ground running or else he's out on his arse!bobo the clown wrote:You'd give him till December ?? If the shambles of the, albeit preseason, Pompey gave is how we are when the gun goes off he should be gone by September.
... & that's early September.
https://twitter.com/Chaddy_81" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38824
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
He's got three games (proper ones not friendlies) for me. 7 points would be the mark from the first three. Or if 6 signs that we look organised and disciplined as a team.
Someone's bound to say that's harsh, and clearly he won't be sacked so soon. But after last season, for me those first three games will tell us if he can motivate the players to perform for him again or not.
Someone's bound to say that's harsh, and clearly he won't be sacked so soon. But after last season, for me those first three games will tell us if he can motivate the players to perform for him again or not.
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: The Abyss
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
It isn't harsh, 7 points minimum Burnley, Derby, Nottingham Forest 3 shit teams we really should be getting maximum points from. Fans are on his case now so owen knows the score.BWFC_Insane wrote:He's got three games (proper ones not friendlies) for me. 7 points would be the mark from the first three. Or if 6 signs that we look organised and disciplined as a team.
Someone's bound to say that's harsh, and clearly he won't be sacked so soon. But after last season, for me those first three games will tell us if he can motivate the players to perform for him again or not.
https://twitter.com/Chaddy_81" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
Aye alreet - 2 of last year's promoted teams had less than 7 points after 3 games. One of them had 4 and finished top of the league.Jokers in White wrote:It isn't harsh, 7 points minimum Burnley, Derby, Nottingham Forest 3 shit teams we really should be getting maximum points from. Fans are on his case now so owen knows the score.BWFC_Insane wrote:He's got three games (proper ones not friendlies) for me. 7 points would be the mark from the first three. Or if 6 signs that we look organised and disciplined as a team.
Someone's bound to say that's harsh, and clearly he won't be sacked so soon. But after last season, for me those first three games will tell us if he can motivate the players to perform for him again or not.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
It's comments like this that make (some of) us look as bad as Spam fans.Jokers in White wrote:It isn't harsh, 7 points minimum Burnley, Derby, Nottingham Forest 3 shit teams we really should be getting maximum points from. Fans are on his case now so owen knows the score.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Jaffka's gossip thread on the ins and outs at the 'Bok
One of 'em had 9. After two away games.Wandering Willy wrote:Aye alreet - 2 of last year's promoted teams had less than 7 points after 3 games. One of them had 4 and finished top of the league.Jokers in White wrote:It isn't harsh, 7 points minimum Burnley, Derby, Nottingham Forest 3 shit teams we really should be getting maximum points from. Fans are on his case now so owen knows the score.BWFC_Insane wrote:He's got three games (proper ones not friendlies) for me. 7 points would be the mark from the first three. Or if 6 signs that we look organised and disciplined as a team.
Someone's bound to say that's harsh, and clearly he won't be sacked so soon. But after last season, for me those first three games will tell us if he can motivate the players to perform for him again or not.
Reading had 4 after two away games
West Ham has 6 after two away games.
We have two home games.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot] and 37 guests