The Religion Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Hoboh » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:35 pm

William the White wrote:Evenin' Tango...

I've been sinning... How about you? :wink:
Wow! clap clap, clap what a masterpiece entrance that was William.
Seriously impressed!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by thebish » Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:22 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
thebish wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
You wouldn't want to know if Jesus had a family? I'm not a particularly religious person (anymore) but I would be more than curious to see what the son of god's great great great great great (plus however many's) grandson would look like or be like. Wouldn't you? Perhaps he'd have some family heirlooms knocking about, the odd grail or somesuch.
in a word - no!

(as it happens I'm fairly sure he didn't have kids - but I'd not be that interested if he did... In the same way I am a Bob Dylan fan - but I'm not interested in his kids or grandkids and I don't know if he has any or if he does how many and what their names are... same with all the Bolton players - did Nat Lofthouse have kids, grand-kids? am I interested in seeing what they look like? nahhhh!)

Genuine question because I'm confused. I'm not that familiar with your particular denomination or it's doctrine but are you saying that Jesus is no more important in your life than Nat Lofthouse or Bob Dylan? And that you wouldn't want to know how he lived his life because it's not relevant? (Okay, 2 questions)
errr... no - I am saying that I am no more interested in Dylan's kids than I am in the question of whether Jesus had any. (ie - in both cases - not at all.) that's not to say you are not allowed to be interested.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by thebish » Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:26 pm

Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
thebish wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:Some of the rejected gospels did state Christ was married.
oh? really??
I believe there is even one with the title "the Gospel of Mary wife of Jesus".
I don't.

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:41 pm

C'mon bish, have a little faith. :wink:
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:24 am

thebish wrote:
Lost Leopard Spot wrote:
thebish wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:Some of the rejected gospels did state Christ was married.
oh? really??
I believe there is even one with the title "the Gospel of Mary wife of Jesus".
I don't.
The one I was thinking of was the Gospel of Philip.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by thebish » Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:09 am

Montreal Wanderer wrote: The one I was thinking of was the Gospel of Philip.
I don't believe that one states Jesus was married.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:13 pm

Despite being brought up a Catholic, and indeed being one all my life (though not the best example perhaps), there are somethings about religion I've never understood. Fanaticism is one of them. (as in the latest Muslim fandango. I bring it here because this is the religion thread). That's people, not religion. I'd never want to go to Jurusalem and re-enact the crucifiction by lugging a wooden cross around or walking a mile on my knees for example. Did Jesus tell anyone to do that? Going to the Holy City is something I'd like to do myself from respect. but those who think Heaven is attained by whipping yourself would be better saving the air fare and donating it to their local church. Not that every form of religion hasn't been involved in some extravagent lunacy through the ages of course, Christians not the least.

Churches, Cathedrals, Mosques, Synagogues and places of worship etc, should have respect from all. That said, prayer should be in them and in the privacy of homes. Festivals and processions are the obvious exceptions, but manipulation by power-hungry charlatans, politicians etc, using God to further their own ends never had a part in God's teachings. The biggest mental block seems to be the reluctance to accept that what happened two thousand years and beyond ago was meant to set the rules in the basics and that time moves on and the world with it. I'd urge anyone interested enough to read Jerusalem, the biography, by Simon Sebag Montefiorre. WtW lent it to me and it's a real eye-opener. What any of it is really to do with God is still very much a mystery. The whole, "My God is better than your God" thing is man's hypocracy, not religion at all.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Gary the Enfield » Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:26 pm

thebish wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
thebish wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
You wouldn't want to know if Jesus had a family? I'm not a particularly religious person (anymore) but I would be more than curious to see what the son of god's great great great great great (plus however many's) grandson would look like or be like. Wouldn't you? Perhaps he'd have some family heirlooms knocking about, the odd grail or somesuch.
in a word - no!

(as it happens I'm fairly sure he didn't have kids - but I'd not be that interested if he did... In the same way I am a Bob Dylan fan - but I'm not interested in his kids or grandkids and I don't know if he has any or if he does how many and what their names are... same with all the Bolton players - did Nat Lofthouse have kids, grand-kids? am I interested in seeing what they look like? nahhhh!)

Genuine question because I'm confused. I'm not that familiar with your particular denomination or it's doctrine but are you saying that Jesus is no more important in your life than Nat Lofthouse or Bob Dylan? And that you wouldn't want to know how he lived his life because it's not relevant? (Okay, 2 questions)
errr... no - I am saying that I am no more interested in Dylan's kids than I am in the question of whether Jesus had any. (ie - in both cases - not at all.) that's not to say you are not allowed to be interested.

Cheers. :wink:

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sun Sep 23, 2012 4:50 pm

thebish wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote: The one I was thinking of was the Gospel of Philip.
I don't believe that one states Jesus was married.
I have since looked it up. You are correct that it does not use the word marriage in the translation I read. There are also doubtless with some words missing from the source to make translation harder. However, it implies a married relationship to some extent.

“There were three who always walked with the Lord: Mary his mother and her sister and Magdalene, the one who was called his companion”

“And the companion of the Savior is Mary Magdalene. But Christ loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on her mouth."

Personally I don't think the fact that gospels say neither that he was married or was not means anything. I gather he is revered in Judaism and Islam as a messiah and prophet and that this would make marriage probable. If rather he was the son of God he may have been above such things but that would include the type of relationship implied by the gospel of Philip.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:32 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote: Personally I don't think the fact that gospels say neither that he was married or was not means anything. I gather he is revered in Judaism and Islam as a messiah and prophet and that this would make marriage probable. If rather he was the son of God he may have been above such things but that would include the type of relationship implied by the gospel of Philip.
During his life Jesus suffered all the attributes and characteristics of a normal man. He showed love, generosity, anger, bewilderment, sorrow and, during the crucifiction, torture, great pain and suffering. He also, presumably had male feelings. The concept of the son of God adopting the body of a man during his life on earth and shedding it upon his death is how I've always seen Jesus. To appear to Mary Magdalen on his ressurection and ascension would be possible to the son of God for that very reason. Not everyone's view I agree. On the other hand, on knowing he was to die at thirty three, would he marry and leave a wife bereaved? There is no record as far as I'm aware of him asking anyone to look after his family after his death. Then there is the Essene code of chastity to consider. Theories abound and proof and denial have battled forever. Nobody actually knows.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by jaffka » Sun Sep 23, 2012 6:38 pm

He was a top fella Jesus, did some good stuff.

Should have been a bit better a choosing his mates though, that what let him down.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:17 am

Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by William the White » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:16 am

Prufrock wrote:Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
Shakespeare is a lot more believable though.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:35 pm

William the White wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
Shakespeare is a lot more believable though.
From the last will and testament of said bard: :wink:

"In the name of God, I William Shakespeare...God be praised, do make and ordain this, my last will and testament in manner and form following. That is to say, first I commend my soul into the hands of God my Creator, hoping and assuredly believing, through the merits of Jesus Christ, my saviour, to be made partaker of eternal life, and my body to the earth whereof it is made."
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by William the White » Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:42 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
Shakespeare is a lot more believable though.
From the last will and testament of said bard: :wink:

"In the name of God, I William Shakespeare...God be praised, do make and ordain this, my last will and testament in manner and form following. That is to say, first I commend my soul into the hands of God my Creator, hoping and assuredly believing, through the merits of Jesus Christ, my saviour, to be made partaker of eternal life, and my body to the earth whereof it is made."
Outstanding - Shakespeare is world renowned as a master of fiction... :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:00 pm

William the White wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
Shakespeare is a lot more believable though.
From the last will and testament of said bard: :wink:

"In the name of God, I William Shakespeare...God be praised, do make and ordain this, my last will and testament in manner and form following. That is to say, first I commend my soul into the hands of God my Creator, hoping and assuredly believing, through the merits of Jesus Christ, my saviour, to be made partaker of eternal life, and my body to the earth whereof it is made."
Outstanding - Shakespeare is world renowned as a master of fiction... :wink:
Even the great Omar wasn't sure how it all ends Will:

"Up from Earth's centre, throught the seventh gate,
I rose, and on the throne of Saturn sate.
And many knots unravelled by the road;
But not the knot of human death and fate."
:wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by William the White » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:59 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Shakespeare hasn't got anything on Matthew Mark Luke, or John.
Shakespeare is a lot more believable though.
From the last will and testament of said bard: :wink:

"In the name of God, I William Shakespeare...God be praised, do make and ordain this, my last will and testament in manner and form following. That is to say, first I commend my soul into the hands of God my Creator, hoping and assuredly believing, through the merits of Jesus Christ, my saviour, to be made partaker of eternal life, and my body to the earth whereof it is made."
Outstanding - Shakespeare is world renowned as a master of fiction... :wink:
Even the great Omar wasn't sure how it all ends Will:

"Up from Earth's centre, throught the seventh gate,
I rose, and on the throne of Saturn sate.
And many knots unravelled by the road;
But not the knot of human death and fate."
:wink:
Exactly... it's the doubt and puzzle that makes Khayyam great... It's the desire that lifts York Minster from the earth... the hope that raises the Mezquita in Cordoba... the desire for glory and eternity... all those searches for the transcendental that our knowledge of death leads us to imagine, and create, and, in a sense, to overcome...

Well done us... We can imagine so much... including our everlasting lives... however ludicrous...

And the long eternal calmness of oblivion, our absence, without thought, or pain, or desire... without being... Is that so hard to accept?

Well... Not hard for me... My children will mourn me... They will tell a few stories to their children... Then even the faintest memory is gone...

So... to respond with the great Khayyam...

Ah, make the most of what we may yet spend,
Before we too into the Dust descend;
Dust into Dust, and under Dust, to lie;
Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and -- sans End!

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:34 am

William the White wrote: Well done us... We can imagine so much... including our everlasting lives... however ludicrous...
And the long eternal calmness of oblivion, our absence, without thought, or pain, or desire... without being... Is that so hard to accept?
Well... Not hard for me... My children will mourn me... They will tell a few stories to their children... Then even the faintest memory is gone...
So... to respond with the great Khayyam...

Ah, make the most of what we may yet spend,
Before we too into the Dust descend;
Dust into Dust, and under Dust, to lie;
Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and -- sans End!
Too late to reply, my bed calls. Till tomorrow then.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by Gary the Enfield » Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:30 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote: Well done us... We can imagine so much... including our everlasting lives... however ludicrous...
And the long eternal calmness of oblivion, our absence, without thought, or pain, or desire... without being... Is that so hard to accept?
Well... Not hard for me... My children will mourn me... They will tell a few stories to their children... Then even the faintest memory is gone...
So... to respond with the great Khayyam...
Ah, make the most of what we may yet spend,
Before we too into the Dust descend;
Dust into Dust, and under Dust, to lie;
Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and -- sans End!
Too late to reply, my bed calls. Till tomorrow then.

I believe he also said ''I liked it so much I bought the company''

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: The Religion Thread

Post by TANGODANCER » Tue Sep 25, 2012 1:42 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:
William the White wrote: Well done us... We can imagine so much... including our everlasting lives... however ludicrous...
And the long eternal calmness of oblivion, our absence, without thought, or pain, or desire... without being... Is that so hard to accept?
Well... Not hard for me... My children will mourn me... They will tell a few stories to their children... Then even the faintest memory is gone...
So... to respond with the great Khayyam...
Ah, make the most of what we may yet spend,
Before we too into the Dust descend;
Dust into Dust, and under Dust, to lie;
Sans Wine, sans Song, sans Singer, and -- sans End!
Too late to reply, my bed calls. Till tomorrow then.

I believe he also said ''I liked it so much I bought the company''
Listen young shaver.... :mrgreen:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests