Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Thread

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by officer_dibble » Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:55 am

Goals are on the i player. seems sky arent as arsed about the beeb showing the NPC as they were the BPL

Sponge
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 10:17 am

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Sponge » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:05 pm

Damn, watched the Palace – Millwall highlights. That Zaha lad really is a quite good.

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by General Mannerheim » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:35 pm

Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:38 pm

Sponge wrote:Damn, watched the Palace – Millwall highlights. That Zaha lad really is a quite good.
20 million pounds good unfortunately. Shame we couldnt prise him off them last season with our joke offer! If Freedman comes here Zaha will be off to one of the big London clubs in the window.Missed our chance unfortunately i think.
Perhaps we could get him on loan though if the club that signs him dont need him immediately.
Not short of wingers are we?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:39 pm

General Mannerheim wrote:Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?
Think we tried that in Jan. We offered 3m they wanted 6m, iirc.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:43 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?
Think we tried that in Jan. We offered 3m they wanted 6m, iirc.

It's really annoying me now

What does IIRC stand for
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

Ianmooreslovechild
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 12:00 am

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Ianmooreslovechild » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:45 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?
Think we tried that in Jan. We offered 3m they wanted 6m, iirc.

It's really annoying me now

What does IIRC stand for
6 mil would have been a steal if i remember correctly.
Mind you we wouldnt have had sordell if we'd got him so.......

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:46 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?
Think we tried that in Jan. We offered 3m they wanted 6m, iirc.

It's really annoying me now

What does IIRC stand for
Sorry mate, if I recall correctly.

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:49 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
plymouth wanderer wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
General Mannerheim wrote:Wonder if he'd fancy following Dougie up yon?
Think we tried that in Jan. We offered 3m they wanted 6m, iirc.

It's really annoying me now

What does IIRC stand for
Sorry mate, if I recall correctly.

Cheers bud

That's annoyed the shit out of me for ages

Every time i see it i sit there for 10 mins trying to figure it out

Took me long enough to find out what IMO ment :lol:
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Verbal » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:57 pm

That means in my opinion, AFAIK
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Oct 21, 2012 12:58 pm

Verbal wrote:That means in my opinion, AFAIK

Enlighten me
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by thebish » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:01 pm

plymouth wanderer wrote:
Verbal wrote:That means in my opinion, AFAIK

Enlighten me
as far as i know...

User avatar
plymouth wanderer
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4571
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
Location: Er Plymouth

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by plymouth wanderer » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:04 pm

Ideal. I'm no good at this text talk
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by General Mannerheim » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:05 pm

Bunch of T

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Oct 21, 2012 1:54 pm

Little Green Man wrote: Once again the goals were conceded down the left and through the centre.
Doubt anybody could have done much about the first. One of those that either go in the net or into row z. It was just another cross into the box till the guy tried the overhead and it worked. Has to be a great goal. If Ream hadn't tried to put a foot in to the ball, he'd probably have got slated for not trying. That's football.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by TKIZ! » Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:07 pm

Still in shock. Left the ground feeling dazed and confused. Fans around me booing when we kept the ball and passed it about from the back, hatred of Eagles and love for Petrov astounded me. Substitutions that made sense, I'm bewildered by it all really.

Spearing, Warnock, SKD and Eagles were freaking AWESOME yesterday.
Pfffft.

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Dr.Karl » Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:33 pm

All three goals were great. How many Eagles free kicks is that?
truewhite15 wrote:
Coming out after the break, we had switched to a 4-2-3-1; inspired, as it turned out. We were all over them. Great football, we didn't look weak in the midfield as we normally would have done (and in fact, we didn't even look weak in the midfield first half), and Bristol just couldn't handle us. Within about 5 minutes, you just knew we were gonna win it.
How did we line up when we switched system? I'm just glad a manager realises that switching to one up top isn't necessarily negative when you start with two strikers.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3032
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by truewhite15 » Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:33 pm

TKIZ! wrote:Still in shock. Left the ground feeling dazed and confused. Fans around me booing when we kept the ball and passed it about from the back, hatred of Eagles and love for Petrov astounded me. Substitutions that made sense, I'm bewildered by it all really.

Spearing, Warnock, SKD and Eagles were freaking AWESOME yesterday.
I'm with you on that one. Plenty around me (NSL) moan and groan whenever we keep the ball and pass it around, instead of launching it up the pitch, cos we're not getting it up fast enough, but then whinge when we launch it up the pitch cos it doesn't work. One bloke on the front row is particularly guilty of that. Every single match.

User avatar
truewhite15
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3032
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by truewhite15 » Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:35 pm

Dr.Karl wrote:All three goals were great. How many Eagles free kicks is that?
truewhite15 wrote:
Coming out after the break, we had switched to a 4-2-3-1; inspired, as it turned out. We were all over them. Great football, we didn't look weak in the midfield as we normally would have done (and in fact, we didn't even look weak in the midfield first half), and Bristol just couldn't handle us. Within about 5 minutes, you just knew we were gonna win it.
How did we line up when we switched system? I'm just glad a manager realises that switching to one up top isn't necessarily negative when you start with two strikers.
Afobe went to the right flank, Eagles as the attacking midfielder, Sparky and Spearing as the holders. As I say, worked very well, and the only weak link was Afobe; who, apart from absolutely blitzing past their full back in one lightning run, did feck all. Chungy looked useful and lively when he came on; the sooner he's a bona fide first teamer again, the better.

Dr.Karl
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 573
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:58 pm
Location: The Gun Capital/The Pastie Capital
Contact:

Re: Sammy Lee's Bolton v Peter Puppies' City... The Match Th

Post by Dr.Karl » Sun Oct 21, 2012 3:28 pm

truewhite15 wrote:
Dr.Karl wrote:All three goals were great. How many Eagles free kicks is that?
truewhite15 wrote:
Coming out after the break, we had switched to a 4-2-3-1; inspired, as it turned out. We were all over them. Great football, we didn't look weak in the midfield as we normally would have done (and in fact, we didn't even look weak in the midfield first half), and Bristol just couldn't handle us. Within about 5 minutes, you just knew we were gonna win it.
How did we line up when we switched system? I'm just glad a manager realises that switching to one up top isn't necessarily negative when you start with two strikers.
Afobe went to the right flank, Eagles as the attacking midfielder, Sparky and Spearing as the holders. As I say, worked very well, and the only weak link was Afobe; who, apart from absolutely blitzing past their full back in one lightning run, did feck all. Chungy looked useful and lively when he came on; the sooner he's a bona fide first teamer again, the better.
Cheers for that. Now we just need the right players in their right positions!
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind - Gandhi

A cynic is man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing - Wilde

I have a fax in my pocket - Gartside

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dave the minion, Google [Bot], jmjhb, truewhite15 and 33 guests