Wine
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Wine
bit of christmas shopping (of the food variety) in Lidl with the missus this morning..
stumbled across some fairtrade Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot (South African - western cape)
will report back...
stumbled across some fairtrade Cabernet Sauvignon Merlot (South African - western cape)
will report back...
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Wine
Well....?
Verdict please Bish !
Verdict please Bish !
Re: Wine
I must learn to talk wine one day... but - if there are wines that are easy to drink - then presumably there must be wines that are hard to drink. What makes a wine hard to drink - is it code for "tastes rank"? if not - then what??Hoboh wrote:Ponte Guglie Garganega 2011
Italian white
lively, fresh and appley
Nice easy drink, was at Asda on the 3 4 £10
Re: Wine
Some wines you have to work and wait for the flavour and taste to hit I guessthebish wrote:I must learn to talk wine one day... but - if there are wines that are easy to drink - then presumably there must be wines that are hard to drink. What makes a wine hard to drink - is it code for "tastes rank"? if not - then what??Hoboh wrote:Ponte Guglie Garganega 2011
Italian white
lively, fresh and appley
Nice easy drink, was at Asda on the 3 4 £10
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Wine
I'm not a white fanatic, but with red there are some that are more dense, richer, more conducive to sipping and savouring the complexities, and then there's the nice easy drinkable ones that you can throw down and still enjoy.
Re: Wine
hmm - but in practice - what is that?? what does it mean to "work" a wine??Hoboh wrote:Some wines you have to work and wait for the flavour and taste to hit I guessthebish wrote:I must learn to talk wine one day... but - if there are wines that are easy to drink - then presumably there must be wines that are hard to drink. What makes a wine hard to drink - is it code for "tastes rank"? if not - then what??Hoboh wrote:Ponte Guglie Garganega 2011
Italian white
lively, fresh and appley
Nice easy drink, was at Asda on the 3 4 £10
Re: Wine
ohjimmyjimmy wrote:I'm not a white fanatic, but with red there are some that are more dense, richer, more conducive to sipping and savouring the complexities, and then there's the nice easy drinkable ones that you can throw down and still enjoy.
ahhh - i can understand that - "easy" means glug it down fast - "hard" means sip and savour?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4108
- Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am
- Location: The House of Fun (it's quicker if you run)
Re: Wine
In a way, yes...easy i suppose means you can have drank half a bottle before even realising it too ! With some, if you've drank half a bottle in half an hour, you know about it 

Re: Wine
Hoboh wrote:Take it slow and work the butt off your taste buds senses and brain to put everything together then finally critique it
maybe there's a space for you in William's discerning diners, aesthetes and supporters club after all!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Wine
He'll be on the waiting list... For quite a while...thebish wrote:Hoboh wrote:Take it slow and work the butt off your taste buds senses and brain to put everything together then finally critique it
maybe there's a space for you in William's discerning diners, aesthetes and supporters club after all!

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wine
The compounds in red wine are more complex bish. Thats why, in general, they last longer. A five year old bottle (of good quality wine, that must be stressed, not all wine ages well) will taste different to it at 25. Many people assume that its tastes "better" after age, but the truth is it usually just tastes "different", but in a good way. Young wine often exhibits fruit characteristics, whereas the older it is, the more likely it is to display "woody" characteristics, variously described as tobacco, cigar box etc etc. In general, the tannins will also soften, so older wine tends to taste smoother on the tongue, less rough. Added to that, the different acidic compounds also change, because a tiny amount of oxygen exchange happens through the micro-porous cork.
If you're remotely interested in the idea, but don't want to spend the money or time on it, buy a bottle of Rioja thats seen some oak (crianza, Reserva, Gran Reserva) and a bottle of New World (Oz, Kiwi, Yank etc) plonk from the supermarket and taste the two side-by-side. This is real broad brushstroke stuff, but you have in those two effectively the tastes of Old and New. See which you prefer.
I could go on for hours, but I prefer old, effectively the ageing releases a plrthora of chemical compounds, giving the wine complexity. Not all people like this, some just want fruit.
Thats why red needs working at, in the main, more than whites. However, just to confuse, some whites also do the same. But differently.
You follow?
If you're remotely interested in the idea, but don't want to spend the money or time on it, buy a bottle of Rioja thats seen some oak (crianza, Reserva, Gran Reserva) and a bottle of New World (Oz, Kiwi, Yank etc) plonk from the supermarket and taste the two side-by-side. This is real broad brushstroke stuff, but you have in those two effectively the tastes of Old and New. See which you prefer.
I could go on for hours, but I prefer old, effectively the ageing releases a plrthora of chemical compounds, giving the wine complexity. Not all people like this, some just want fruit.
Thats why red needs working at, in the main, more than whites. However, just to confuse, some whites also do the same. But differently.
You follow?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Wine
it's the phrase "working at" that i can't picture... I'm not sure i am grasping that there is any more effort required in drinking it! (unless there is some kind of extra mouth-activity going on?)Lord Kangana wrote:
You follow?
I know it's just a phrase - it just seems like an odd one to me!!
I can understand having to work at a steak - because it is chewy - but not a drink!
if it is my taste-buds doing more "work" (and again - do they?? - in what sense do taste-buds put effort in?) - then that's not consciously harder work for me - I don't feel in control of the effort-levels of my taste-buds...
that's all!
is it just wine-ese for saying red wines have a fuller flavour???
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wine
No. Its more the complexity. I have tasting notes that have over 50 different flavours from one wine. This is the work. Its not just the simple "ooh apples", it requires a little mental dexterity to actually put a name to all of them from recall. Strangely enough (well not that strange, I hope), I enjoy tasting wine the most with my mother, as we have very similar palettes, but she is exceedingly good at putting a name to the flavours.
Lets be clear here though, this is not an experience you're going to get from 3 for a tenner wines. Thats where the working bit comes in.
Lets be clear here though, this is not an experience you're going to get from 3 for a tenner wines. Thats where the working bit comes in.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Wine
so the "work" is mental (not physical) work to try to identify and name all the things it might taste of or be reminiscent of?Lord Kangana wrote:No. Its more the complexity. I have tasting notes that have over 50 different flavours from one wine. This is the work. Its not just the simple "ooh apples", it requires a little mental dexterity to actually put a name to all of them from recall. Strangely enough (well not that strange, I hope), I enjoy tasting wine the most with my mother, as we have very similar palettes, but she is exceedingly good at putting a name to the flavours.
Lets be clear here though, this is not an experience you're going to get from 3 for a tenner wines. Thats where the working bit comes in.
do people (other than Jilly Cooper) actually do this??
is there a right answer for each wine - or is it subjective? could you tell your mother she that she was wrong and the wine is NOT reminiscent of laundry on a wet thursday?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wine
Yes, yes and yes.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Wine
Lord Kangana wrote:Yes, yes and yes.

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Wine
Yes.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests