Millwall @ The Reebok
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
It does appear that's happening more and more at the minute...thebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Always does when the footy's not working.Annoyed Grunt wrote:It does appear that's happening more and more at the minute...thebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Not mine this timethebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!

-
- Legend
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:25 am
- Location: Bolton
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
True, but it's at the slightest thing now....bobo the clown wrote:Always does when the footy's not working.Annoyed Grunt wrote:It does appear that's happening more and more at the minute...thebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Post of the year.......a1 wrote:The criterion which determines whethere they are all cnuts or not.
I say they are.
Coyles players shithouse bottlers
Freedmans selection and tactics better than coyles but not what I would pick for everything (ngog/stump for instance)
gartsides mess?
maybe ^^ coz he (gartside) got to chummy with thedick (coyle)
for me , everything freedman does is better. he even gets points at home were you know coyle would ballz up and concede 3 .
maybe thats not great. but fecking hell fire, imo, it were better than 'put everything in the fa cup basket' coyle did to get himself known, at the detriment of owt else.
"he doesnt know what he's done to this club"
he signed crap , or signed reasonably good 'uns then made 'em crap. summat. their heads have gone now.
's up to #dougiecool to sort it and it may take money they dont have. i think theyre hoping this development thing makes 'em into a mini-mancity for some kinda rich baron to buy, imo. dont think relegation were in the plan tho.
#fcukoffcoyle

Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
I've asked for your opinion but you said you 'might as well pick a raffle ticket from a hat for all I know', which is odd because you seemed fairly sure that it was 'bollocks' when someone else suggested that 'the issue is not the 'quality' of the players, it's making them adapt to the Championship.' It's difficult to 'debate' anything with someone with such a limited knowledge of the subject matter.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:If you want to debate, go ahead.
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
And if it all fails again we could always get Adrian Boothroyd



The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9718
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
FFS you asked me a question about several football teams that I have no interest in. It bears little relevance to what I was discussing at the time. I posted about our players. Something I know enough about to form an opinion. My opinion is about what I have seen with my own 2 eyes. I do not have to have watched Peterborough or Ipswich to form an opinion about the performance of our players. What is so difficult to understand about that. Frazier stated it wasn't the quality of our squad but that they had to adapt. I stated the quality of the squad was not as good as he and many made them out to be on here over recent months. I gave the reasons why. I don't have to have watched Peterfuckinborough to come to that opinion. I therefore have nothing to say about Peterfuckinborough. How feck* difficult is that to get through your thick skull?BL3 wrote:I've asked for your opinion but you said you 'might as well pick a raffle ticket from a hat for all I know', which is odd because you seemed fairly sure that it was 'bollocks' when someone else suggested that 'the issue is not the 'quality' of the players, it's making them adapt to the Championship.' It's difficult to 'debate' anything with someone with such a limited knowledge of the subject matter.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:If you want to debate, go ahead.
For your feck* brain I'll recap, so you might understand...
1. Your question was not relevant to my point. If you wish to ask that question then start a thread, then anyone interested can answer.
2. I have not watched these teams you keep wanking over. That does not mean I cannot assess the performance of our players over the last 3 years.
So, I wont be answering your crap question. I have no interest in your question. If you wish to argue about what I actually posted about then fine...though to be honest I'd prefer it if you just fell off the nearest cliff.
Finally. Get a feck* life

Edit: Bloody censorship

Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:FFS you asked me a question about several football teams that I have no interest in. It bears little relevance to what I was discussing at the time. I posted about our players. Something I know enough about to form an opinion. My opinion is about what I have seen with my own 2 eyes. I do not have to have watched Peterborough or Ipswich to form an opinion about the performance of our players. What is so difficult to understand about that. Frazier stated it wasn't the quality of our squad but that they had to adapt. I stated the quality of the squad was not as good as he and many made them out to be on here over recent months. I gave the reasons why. I don't have to have watched Peterfuckinborough to come to that opinion. I therefore have nothing to say about Peterfuckinborough. How feck difficult is that to get through your thick skull?BL3 wrote:I've asked for your opinion but you said you 'might as well pick a raffle ticket from a hat for all I know', which is odd because you seemed fairly sure that it was 'bollocks' when someone else suggested that 'the issue is not the 'quality' of the players, it's making them adapt to the Championship.' It's difficult to 'debate' anything with someone with such a limited knowledge of the subject matter.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:If you want to debate, go ahead.
For your feck brain I'll recap, so you might understand...
1. Your question was not relevant to my point. If you wish to ask that question then start a thread, then anyone interested can answer.
2. I have not watched these teams you keep wanking over. That does not mean I cannot assess the performance of our players over the last 3 years.
So, I wont be answering your crap question. I have no interest in your question. If you wish to argue about what I actually posted about then fine...though to be honest I'd prefer it if you just fell off the nearest cliff.
Finally. Get a feck life
Edit: Bloody censorship

Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Yes, adapt to the Championship. Something which you apparently don't know anything about and yet it didn't stop you rubbishing his opinion.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Frazier stated it wasn't the quality of our squad but that they had to adapt.
That's debatable.Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:I posted about our players. Something I know enough about to form an opinion
Boggers - might improve. Might not.
Lonergan - Dunno.
Mears - Shit or ok depending on who you speak to.
Riley - Who knows.
Davies - Hard to score.
Ngog - In some ways great, others shite.
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
thebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!

Cheers bish, spot on
I reckon theres been a surge in sales of fanny rags the last 2 days going by some of the touchy shits on here
Last edited by plymouth wanderer on Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
This is getting really bad, shades of those who attacked Megon/Coyle being outcasts!
Mr Freedman is worrying quite a lot of people on the QT, well a lot of those I know anyway. Me? I'm fairly sceptical and will keep to what I stated before, he gets to the end of this month to judge his transfer movements which so far have not set the world on fire. Mr Freedman has signed a striker who by his own admission is off the pace and a young lad on loan for the possible future, not exactly what we need right now!
I do not for one minute think Freedman was what we required at the time IMHO he is totally wet behind the ears in management terms with a track record that shows exactly now't to date.
The main fault for the position this club is now finding its self in is none other Mr Philip Gartside whose knowledge about footballing matters could be written on a postage stamp, history will prove me right on this.
I just hope we are not seeing our club turned into a Sheffield/Leeds type of club that just festers in the second tier of football, a lot of us have been there before but we always had hope, now I sense something has changed or in the process of doing for the worst.
Mr Freedman is worrying quite a lot of people on the QT, well a lot of those I know anyway. Me? I'm fairly sceptical and will keep to what I stated before, he gets to the end of this month to judge his transfer movements which so far have not set the world on fire. Mr Freedman has signed a striker who by his own admission is off the pace and a young lad on loan for the possible future, not exactly what we need right now!
I do not for one minute think Freedman was what we required at the time IMHO he is totally wet behind the ears in management terms with a track record that shows exactly now't to date.
The main fault for the position this club is now finding its self in is none other Mr Philip Gartside whose knowledge about footballing matters could be written on a postage stamp, history will prove me right on this.
I just hope we are not seeing our club turned into a Sheffield/Leeds type of club that just festers in the second tier of football, a lot of us have been there before but we always had hope, now I sense something has changed or in the process of doing for the worst.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
It was either an unpopular experienced choice or a fairly unknown inexperienced choice.Hoboh wrote:This is getting really bad, shades of those who attacked Megon/Coyle being outcasts!
Mr Freedman is worrying quite a lot of people on the QT, well a lot of those I know anyway. Me? I'm fairly sceptical and will keep to what I stated before, he gets to the end of this month to judge his transfer movements which so far have not set the world on fire. Mr Freedman has signed a striker who by his own admission is off the pace and a young lad on loan for the possible future, not exactly what we need right now!
I do not for one minute think Freedman was what we required at the time IMHO he is totally wet behind the ears in management terms with a track record that shows exactly now't to date.
The main fault for the position this club is now finding its self in is none other Mr Philip Gartside whose knowledge about footballing matters could be written on a postage stamp, history will prove me right on this.
I just hope we are not seeing our club turned into a Sheffield/Leeds type of club that just festers in the second tier of football, a lot of us have been there before but we always had hope, now I sense something has changed or in the process of doing for the worst.
Plenty on here said that didn't want any of the 'usual suspected' on the managerial merrygo round. Those managers were the ones with experience.
At this stage its all just going off hunches. I just think Dougie seems to know what he's trying to do and its actually visible on the pitch. We are trying to keep the ball more and trying to play football. Does it always work? No. Is it achieving the results we'd like at this moment in time? No.
But personally I'm happy that we are actually trying to do something people have been asking for. We have a plan. It might not always work but previously we seemed to have no plan at all.
I can live with that until we see it over a longer period and see how it pans out. Some people won't have that patience, that doesn't make it wrong.
But I'm far more prepared to give Dougie time than Owen based on all I've seen and heard. That's my opinion. Even if I didn't we are going to do so.
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Very nice coming from someone who would never allow a referendum for the people on EuropeBWFC_Insane wrote:It was either an unpopular experienced choice or a fairly unknown inexperienced choice.Hoboh wrote:This is getting really bad, shades of those who attacked Megon/Coyle being outcasts!
Mr Freedman is worrying quite a lot of people on the QT, well a lot of those I know anyway. Me? I'm fairly sceptical and will keep to what I stated before, he gets to the end of this month to judge his transfer movements which so far have not set the world on fire. Mr Freedman has signed a striker who by his own admission is off the pace and a young lad on loan for the possible future, not exactly what we need right now!
I do not for one minute think Freedman was what we required at the time IMHO he is totally wet behind the ears in management terms with a track record that shows exactly now't to date.
The main fault for the position this club is now finding its self in is none other Mr Philip Gartside whose knowledge about footballing matters could be written on a postage stamp, history will prove me right on this.
I just hope we are not seeing our club turned into a Sheffield/Leeds type of club that just festers in the second tier of football, a lot of us have been there before but we always had hope, now I sense something has changed or in the process of doing for the worst.
Plenty on here said that didn't want any of the 'usual suspected' on the managerial merrygo round. Those managers were the ones with experience.
At this stage its all just going off hunches. I just think Dougie seems to know what he's trying to do and its actually visible on the pitch. We are trying to keep the ball more and trying to play football. Does it always work? No. Is it achieving the results we'd like at this moment in time? No.
But personally I'm happy that we are actually trying to do something people have been asking for. We have a plan. It might not always work but previously we seemed to have no plan at all.
I can live with that until we see it over a longer period and see how it pans out. Some people won't have that patience, that doesn't make it wrong.
But I'm far more prepared to give Dougie time than Owen based on all I've seen and heard. That's my opinion. Even if I didn't we are going to do so.

Just joking but the things you seem to be saying have changed are hardly noticeable, we still collapse into our shells, give away stupid goals and quite frankly persevere with strikers who make the cows happy as feck! I for one am not interest who grafts aka Megson style in training, it's what they do for 90 during a game that counts.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
I think you're getting uncomfortably close to an understandably-tricky-to-discuss home truth.officer_dibble wrote:
gartsides mess?
Gartside gets in Allardyce. Genius.
Gartside, as I understand it, was instrumental in persuading Eddie Davies to jump on board in the way he has. Again, genius.
But then...
Lee
Megson
Coyle
Freedman?
Relegation
Massive spiralling debt...
(And that Mark f*cking Curtis nonsense)
Lets not dance around the head of a pin about 'doing a job' and shite like that. Its a piss poor record since summer 2007. Thats almost as much time as it was good for. Is it time to start a serious debate about the potentially deep seated problems at our club?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Come on we are clearly keeping the ball better, playing less hopeful long balls and are trying to play a more patient passing game.Hoboh wrote:Very nice coming from someone who would never allow a referendum for the people on EuropeBWFC_Insane wrote:It was either an unpopular experienced choice or a fairly unknown inexperienced choice.Hoboh wrote:This is getting really bad, shades of those who attacked Megon/Coyle being outcasts!
Mr Freedman is worrying quite a lot of people on the QT, well a lot of those I know anyway. Me? I'm fairly sceptical and will keep to what I stated before, he gets to the end of this month to judge his transfer movements which so far have not set the world on fire. Mr Freedman has signed a striker who by his own admission is off the pace and a young lad on loan for the possible future, not exactly what we need right now!
I do not for one minute think Freedman was what we required at the time IMHO he is totally wet behind the ears in management terms with a track record that shows exactly now't to date.
The main fault for the position this club is now finding its self in is none other Mr Philip Gartside whose knowledge about footballing matters could be written on a postage stamp, history will prove me right on this.
I just hope we are not seeing our club turned into a Sheffield/Leeds type of club that just festers in the second tier of football, a lot of us have been there before but we always had hope, now I sense something has changed or in the process of doing for the worst.
Plenty on here said that didn't want any of the 'usual suspected' on the managerial merrygo round. Those managers were the ones with experience.
At this stage its all just going off hunches. I just think Dougie seems to know what he's trying to do and its actually visible on the pitch. We are trying to keep the ball more and trying to play football. Does it always work? No. Is it achieving the results we'd like at this moment in time? No.
But personally I'm happy that we are actually trying to do something people have been asking for. We have a plan. It might not always work but previously we seemed to have no plan at all.
I can live with that until we see it over a longer period and see how it pans out. Some people won't have that patience, that doesn't make it wrong.
But I'm far more prepared to give Dougie time than Owen based on all I've seen and heard. That's my opinion. Even if I didn't we are going to do so.![]()
Just joking but the things you seem to be saying have changed are hardly noticeable, we still collapse into our shells, give away stupid goals and quite frankly persevere with strikers who make the cows happy as feck! I for one am not interest who grafts aka Megson style in training, it's what they do for 90 during a game that counts.
Stuff people wanted us to do.
We are also conceding less, I think W4E showed that statistically. What we are not doing is buying chances and neither creating enough chances given the accuracy of our finishing, and yes still we seem to make one silly mistake a game and concede from it.
Some of that is 'fine margins'. Other parts will change as the right personnel are acquired.
I know where you are coming from, it is incredibly frustrating. Incredibly.
But I think we could spend eternity looking for the man who has the 'key to the lock', and perhaps never find him with disastrous consequences, rather than spending the time with to rebuild the door and replace the lock.
Feck this season has been a disaster and along with last season being an even bigger disaster, we have to hope Freedman comes up with the goods. I don't think it's good for the soul all this!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38821
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
That may be so. But I guess who would have done a different job and what would they have done different? In reality?Lord Kangana wrote:I think you're getting uncomfortably close to an understandably-tricky-to-discuss home truth.officer_dibble wrote:
gartsides mess?
Gartside gets in Allardyce. Genius.
Gartside, as I understand it, was instrumental in persuading Eddie Davies to jump on board in the way he has. Again, genius.
But then...
Lee
Megson
Coyle
Freedman?
Relegation
Massive spiralling debt...
(And that Mark f*cking Curtis nonsense)
Lets not dance around the head of a pin about 'doing a job' and shite like that. Its a piss poor record since summer 2007. Thats almost as much time as it was good for. Is it time to start a serious debate about the potentially deep seated problems at our club?
Is it not just the cyclical nature of success and failure for a club like us?
I don't know.
I look around and I'd rather have Gartside than a lot of the way other clubs are run, seemingly.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Nobody did. We had a difference of opinion is all. I don't make comments on things I can't see. Let's pass on.thebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Millwall @ The Reebok
Dreadful VPL, you!89bwfc89 wrote:Not mine this timethebish wrote:not sure anyone has rubbished Tango... (and rightly not!)
one poster simply dared to venture the suggestion that sometimes Tango might summarize what he has heard on t'radio with a very slight pro-KD slant and a slight anti-Ngog slant...
that's all - nobody died, but some knickers seem to have got twisted!

May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests