creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Talking of which - look, I know that no-one ever played Anderson for his ability to bat, but he really is taking shite to a whole new level. See the way that he dollied his 2nd ball into mid-wicket the other day, thus surrendering his wicket without any resistance whatsoever? I sometimes wonder if he thinks 'bollocks to this batting business, I'll be bowling in 10 minutes and don't want to knacker myself out'.bobo the clown wrote:... I see Anderson, now on 317 test wickets, and currently the 3rd highest English test wicket taker, is now only 8 behind 2nd placed Bob Willis (325) though some way yet to catch Botham's 383.
Given that Botham batted too and was, an 'all rounder' you do begin to realise what an act he was.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Dujon
- Passionate
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
- Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
- Contact:
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Thanks, Mr Insanity, for educating me; I'd missed that point.
Anderson as a batsman? There has been many good bowler over the years that one can only describe as 'bunnies' in the batting department. Glenn McGrath, who stands high in the bowling stakes, was, well, rather poor. I remember at one time he did some intensive training under a batting coach and, although he did improve a bit, it was all pointless in the end.
Anderson as a batsman? There has been many good bowler over the years that one can only describe as 'bunnies' in the batting department. Glenn McGrath, who stands high in the bowling stakes, was, well, rather poor. I remember at one time he did some intensive training under a batting coach and, although he did improve a bit, it was all pointless in the end.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9722
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I'd be interested to see Anderson stats for batting for innings where he has to bowl immediately after and not. Given how much the mental side of sport is important I do wonder that he is mentally preparing for his bowling given he is usually 1st up. A fair few of the good bowlers and batters didn't open the bowling and usually batted higher up the order, giving them more time to mentally prepare between to very different jobs. Of course, he could just be a wuss with a bat 

-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Anderson used to have a bit of a decent batting streak, didn't he? Not in the scoring sense, but in the 'sticking about and annoying the bowlers' sense.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Nah. He's just practised too much with our top order.....Bruce Rioja wrote:Talking of which - look, I know that no-one ever played Anderson for his ability to bat, but he really is taking shite to a whole new level. See the way that he dollied his 2nd ball into mid-wicket the other day, thus surrendering his wicket without any resistance whatsoever? I sometimes wonder if he thinks 'bollocks to this batting business, I'll be bowling in 10 minutes and don't want to knacker myself out'.bobo the clown wrote:... I see Anderson, now on 317 test wickets, and currently the 3rd highest English test wicket taker, is now only 8 behind 2nd placed Bob Willis (325) though some way yet to catch Botham's 383.
Given that Botham batted too and was, an 'all rounder' you do begin to realise what an act he was.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
The Lloyds test begins. Home boys with the bat.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
bollocks.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Flat pitch, perfect batting conditions, 28-3.
Fecks sake.
Fecks sake.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Aaaaah ..... just like the old days.BWFC_Insane wrote:Flat pitch, perfect batting conditions, 28-3.
Fecks sake.
The score 34-4 was almost a given back then.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Just hoping Bell can save the day again. Pietersen a disappointment and our front lads don't seem to get it together at the same time. Have to dig in and grind it.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Australia have bowled very well in addition to our own failings.TANGODANCER wrote:Just hoping Bell can save the day again. Pietersen a disappointment and our front lads don't seem to get it together at the same time. Have to dig in and grind it.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 12:21 am
- Location: On the hunt for Zat Knight's spinal cord
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
did boycott just say 'bollocking' on the radio?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Oh, no doubt on that. It's what makes the Ashes so gripping. One side being miles better than the other is no use at all. Maybe our no 11 will score a century..BWFC_Insane wrote:Australia have bowled very well in addition to our own failings.TANGODANCER wrote:Just hoping Bell can save the day again. Pietersen a disappointment and our front lads don't seem to get it together at the same time. Have to dig in and grind it.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
He did.mrkint wrote:did boycott just say 'bollocking' on the radio?
Maybe he'll get a telling off.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
I can just imagine Boycott saying "bollocking". It's like the word was dreamed up just for him. I can't imagine anyone else saying it quite so well.bobo the clown wrote:He did.mrkint wrote:did boycott just say 'bollocking' on the radio?
Maybe he'll get a telling off.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38861
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet
Possibly, though the term 'uncovered pitches' was definitely made for him.Bruce Rioja wrote:I can just imagine Boycott saying "bollocking". It's like the word was dreamed up just for him. I can't imagine anyone else saying it quite so well.bobo the clown wrote:He did.mrkint wrote:did boycott just say 'bollocking' on the radio?
Maybe he'll get a telling off.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests