creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:37 pm

I'd be tempted to put them in them in for a little while tonight to see if we could get a couple of quick wickets. Of course this may depending on the weather forecast (can we be guaranteed two full days?).
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:05 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:I'd be tempted to put them in them in for a little while tonight to see if we could get a couple of quick wickets. Of course this may depending on the weather forecast (can we be guaranteed two full days?).
Strangely enough for the UK Monty, I think we will probably get two full days, weather-wise. Would be just our luck to suffer a plagues of frogs though.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:24 pm

Anyone else other than Bumble didn't think that catch from Bell carried. I understand what Gower is saying about it being deceiving, but I didn't think it carried either and can absolutely see why an Umpire who has to give the batsman the benefit of the doubt might have given it not out.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38851
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:50 pm

Worthy4England wrote:Anyone else other than Bumble didn't think that catch from Bell carried. I understand what Gower is saying about it being deceiving, but I didn't think it carried either and can absolutely see why an Umpire who has to give the batsman the benefit of the doubt might have given it not out.
I think it carried. But that's a think, not a certain. So what would you do as a 3rd umpire?

Edit: I agree with Bumble though, the more overs we make them bowl the further we grind their bowlers down physically and mentally for the rest of the series. Bowled 170 more than us already. Few more can't hurt.
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:52 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:Anyone else other than Bumble didn't think that catch from Bell carried. I understand what Gower is saying about it being deceiving, but I didn't think it carried either and can absolutely see why an Umpire who has to give the batsman the benefit of the doubt might have given it not out.
I think it carried. But that's a think, not a certain. So what would you do as a 3rd umpire?
Got to give the benefit of the doubt...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38851
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jul 20, 2013 4:58 pm

Really impressed today with Root. As good an innings as I've seen from an England batsman for a while. Before today I felt he didn't look comfortable opening this series looked a little nervy all the time. Last night he got away with one that should have been caught but today he's come out and looked the part.

Totally solid and with just about all the shots. Great stuff.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:09 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Really impressed today with Root. As good an innings as I've seen from an England batsman for a while. Before today I felt he didn't look comfortable opening this series looked a little nervy all the time. Last night he got away with one that should have been caught but today he's come out and looked the part.

Totally solid and with just about all the shots. Great stuff.
Agree on all counts. That little dink down to fine, followed by a sublime cover drive was a joy to behold. Not long handled any sixes yet though - bloody boring openers.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:22 pm

34 for 3 to 282 for five as Bell goes for a great 74. Hero of a man this series. :pray:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:23 pm

I was just about to post I can see us declaring at Bell's 100 or Bell's wicket....Apparently not.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:26 pm

Worthy4England wrote:I was just about to post I can see us declaring at Bell's 100 or Bell's wicket....Apparently not.
Only 18 off three hundred this innings. That might be the break point....then again it might not.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:31 pm

Root gets the Zulu salute and rightly so. Magnificent 150. :pray:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38851
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:45 pm

Think I'd be declaring right now.

Get em in tonight and see how they do after a day in the field.

Cook et al all sat in trackers though so seems like we will bat through. Wouldn't surprise me if we bat on tomorrow morning as well.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34749
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:54 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:Think I'd be declaring right now.

Get em in tonight and see how they do after a day in the field.

Cook et al all sat in trackers though so seems like we will bat through. Wouldn't surprise me if we bat on tomorrow morning as well.
Well they'd need to 548 is only 3 an over, with 180 overs left to bowl.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:57 pm

Root's the man. Two sixes get the crowd Roooooooooting... :pray:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:06 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:Don't give any credit to Siddle so what you do Geoffrey.

Just watched it all again and what a crazy day's cricket. Oz got a couple of bad calls early on but our lads pressured them all day. Got to dig in and get the momentum back. Hope Bell and Prior can get us right back on track. Our star batting lads haven't really shown in this one, but as I said, credit to Siddle. He's a tough little character and a good bowler. Fantastic cricket to watch.
Trott's was a poor shot.

Pietersen's was terrible.

Siddle bowled well but KP had no need to go after that particular ball especially so early in his innings.
Do we excuse KP since he was actually hurt?
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:30 pm

No team has ever score more than 406 in the last innings so 566 looks pretty safe to me - but will they go on grinding Oz into the ground?
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:36 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:No team has ever score more than 406 in the last innings so 566 looks pretty safe to me - but will they go on grinding Oz into the ground?
There's always the possibility Oz can dig in, hang on and force a draw. That would be rather less than exciting, so yes, grind them down, soften them up and kiss em goodbye. It's an Ashes thing. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38851
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jul 20, 2013 9:38 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:No team has ever score more than 406 in the last innings so 566 looks pretty safe to me - but will they go on grinding Oz into the ground?

There's always the possibility Oz can dig in, hang on and force a draw. That would be rather less than exciting, so yes, grind them down, soften them up and kiss em goodbye. It's an Ashes thing. :wink:
In tests the record 4th innings chase is 418. In first class cricket the record is 530 or something.

Of course you also have to look at 4th innings successful chases whereby less runs were achieved but wickets were in hand. There are examples of those. West Indies v England in 1984 for example, Windies chased down 344 with 9 wickets remaining.

I think they have more than enough. I would have stuck em in end of today. But I think England will bat on an hour in the morning as the weather is set fair.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Sat Jul 20, 2013 10:53 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:No team has ever score more than 406 in the last innings so 566 looks pretty safe to me - but will they go on grinding Oz into the ground?

There's always the possibility Oz can dig in, hang on and force a draw. That would be rather less than exciting, so yes, grind them down, soften them up and kiss em goodbye. It's an Ashes thing. :wink:
In tests the record 4th innings chase is 418. In first class cricket the record is 530 or something.

Of course you also have to look at 4th innings successful chases whereby less runs were achieved but wickets were in hand. There are examples of those. West Indies v England in 1984 for example, Windies chased down 344 with 9 wickets remaining.

I think they have more than enough. I would have stuck em in end of today. But I think England will bat on an hour in the morning as the weather is set fair.
Actually we were both wrong (or used inaccurate sources which in my case which stated India's 406 was the highest successful chase). The highest fourth innings score in test cricket was England's 654 for 5 against South Africa in 1939 chasing a total of 696. At the close of the tenth(!) day of play (they rested on two Sundays and had one day of no play) a draw was agreed to. England's second innings lasted four days. God, it must have been painful to watch.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38851
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:02 pm

Montreal Wanderer wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Montreal Wanderer wrote:No team has ever score more than 406 in the last innings so 566 looks pretty safe to me - but will they go on grinding Oz into the ground?

There's always the possibility Oz can dig in, hang on and force a draw. That would be rather less than exciting, so yes, grind them down, soften them up and kiss em goodbye. It's an Ashes thing. :wink:
In tests the record 4th innings chase is 418. In first class cricket the record is 530 or something.

Of course you also have to look at 4th innings successful chases whereby less runs were achieved but wickets were in hand. There are examples of those. West Indies v England in 1984 for example, Windies chased down 344 with 9 wickets remaining.

I think they have more than enough. I would have stuck em in end of today. But I think England will bat on an hour in the morning as the weather is set fair.
Actually we were both wrong (or used inaccurate sources which in my case which stated India's 406 was the highest successful chase). The highest fourth innings score in test cricket was England's 654 for 5 against South Africa in 1939 chasing a total of 696. At the close of the tenth(!) day of play (they rested on two Sundays and had one day of no play) a draw was agreed to. England's second innings lasted four days. God, it must have been painful to watch.
That's the highest 4th innings total though. As it was drawn its not a successful run chase. Technically.

There may well be several high fourth innings scores in lost and drawn tests.

Australia got 406 not that long ago in a test they lost for example.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests