A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Peter Thompson
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Peter Thompson » Mon Aug 19, 2013 7:58 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Peter Thompson wrote:He's slow & lazy, has an awful 'can't be bothered' laid back attitude and has a major mistake / error in him in almost every game. He looks like a player who doesn't really care whether we win or lose.

He should never have been given a new contract under Coyle, and even worse should not have been made captain under Freedman. Wheater is equally as bad at the moment even slower than Knight and again there is a mistake in him per game as well.

So playing the 2 of them together is poor football management, anyone with pace & movement will score against us, and TBH I'm staggered that Freedman has put them both in the same team, and this is one of the main reasons why I have doubts in Freedman's judgement and tactical nous as a manager.
So who would you pick?

Matt Mills who seemingly was desperate for a move to Leeds to be reunited with McDermott but wouldn't take a wage cut to do so.....or Ream who if we believe Nixon has said in an interview to the media that he finds the championship too physical and can't cope?
I would have made a mobile, pacy CB my No1 priority in the transfer window before anyone else, got the player in early and then played that player with Mills the other CB....

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38902
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:03 pm

Peter Thompson wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Peter Thompson wrote:He's slow & lazy, has an awful 'can't be bothered' laid back attitude and has a major mistake / error in him in almost every game. He looks like a player who doesn't really care whether we win or lose.

He should never have been given a new contract under Coyle, and even worse should not have been made captain under Freedman. Wheater is equally as bad at the moment even slower than Knight and again there is a mistake in him per game as well.

So playing the 2 of them together is poor football management, anyone with pace & movement will score against us, and TBH I'm staggered that Freedman has put them both in the same team, and this is one of the main reasons why I have doubts in Freedman's judgement and tactical nous as a manager.
So who would you pick?

Matt Mills who seemingly was desperate for a move to Leeds to be reunited with McDermott but wouldn't take a wage cut to do so.....or Ream who if we believe Nixon has said in an interview to the media that he finds the championship too physical and can't cope?
I would have made a mobile, pacy CB my No1 priority in the transfer window before anyone else, got the player in early and then played that player with Mills the other CB....
With what money? Or are you saying play Andrews and don't sign Spearing? Not sure many would have been happy with that.

Seeing as we've had a one in one out I suspect the problem is that we haven't been able to shift any of our centre halves to bring another one in!

StaffsTrotter
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 839
Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:50 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by StaffsTrotter » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:04 pm

think I'd have a quick, strong tackler, good in the air, good on the ball, 2 footed, good range of passing, good reader of the game, leader, hard bastard type as my CB

ChrisC
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3959
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Westhoughton

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by ChrisC » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:13 pm

I think Dougie would have loved to get a centre back in early on, but with us being heavily stocked with centre backs on silly wages it was a no go until someone moved out.

Enoch
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4269
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: The Garden of England.

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Enoch » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:16 pm

I would have made a mobile, pacy CB my No1 priority in the transfer window, got the player in early and then played that player with Jack Charlton.

Oh and renamed the Reebok, Shangri La.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Tombwfc » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:23 pm

He's adopted Elmander's role of 'Expensive signing who hasn't lived up to expectations and has somehow garnered a reputation for not giving a shit'. I think to some people he's basically the poster boy for where it all went wrong

FWIW, I think he's perfectly adequate for the most part. I wouldn't play him and Wheater together, but I don't think they are solely to blame. We seem to be playing too high of a line and we don't keep the ball well at all going forward.

We have a lot of problems and I don't believe that simply shoving West Brom's fifth choice centre half into the team will suddenly solve everything.

Norpig
Promising
Promising
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Norpig » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:25 pm

Well more of an even debate than Knight is rubbish. I am not a fan of Zat I just cannot see why the defence has been singled out. I could have easily have named this post why have we only scored 2 league goals this season?? If the strikers had been more clinical we would be sitting pretty with 6 points making this argument moot.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Tombwfc » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:26 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Peter Thompson wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Peter Thompson wrote:He's slow & lazy, has an awful 'can't be bothered' laid back attitude and has a major mistake / error in him in almost every game. He looks like a player who doesn't really care whether we win or lose.

He should never have been given a new contract under Coyle, and even worse should not have been made captain under Freedman. Wheater is equally as bad at the moment even slower than Knight and again there is a mistake in him per game as well.

So playing the 2 of them together is poor football management, anyone with pace & movement will score against us, and TBH I'm staggered that Freedman has put them both in the same team, and this is one of the main reasons why I have doubts in Freedman's judgement and tactical nous as a manager.
So who would you pick?

Matt Mills who seemingly was desperate for a move to Leeds to be reunited with McDermott but wouldn't take a wage cut to do so.....or Ream who if we believe Nixon has said in an interview to the media that he finds the championship too physical and can't cope?
I would have made a mobile, pacy CB my No1 priority in the transfer window before anyone else, got the player in early and then played that player with Mills the other CB....
With what money? Or are you saying play Andrews and don't sign Spearing? Not sure many would have been happy with that.

Seeing as we've had a one in one out I suspect the problem is that we haven't been able to shift any of our centre halves to bring another one in!
I like Jay, but he isn't the only defensive midfielder on earth. Generally I think tough tackling midfielders who don't offer much creatively are pretty common and usually available quite cheap (Medo, for example). Could we not have spent that £2m (or the majority of it) on a centre half?

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:52 pm

I'd play Chris Fairclough and Gerry Taggert and have done with it :wink:
Pfffft.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38902
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:53 pm

TKIZ! wrote:I'd play Chris Fairclough and Gerry Taggert and have done with it :wink:
Gundi and Gary Cahill for me.....

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:56 pm

N'Gotty and Laville?
Pfffft.

bwfcdan94
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6045
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:32 pm
Location: South

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by bwfcdan94 » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm

We seemed to have a thread similar to this one recently on Knightmare and I stick to what I said in that he is the worst player to play for our club ever.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.

TKIZ!
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7067
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 9:19 pm
Location: Simon Farnworth's glove bag

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by TKIZ! » Mon Aug 19, 2013 8:57 pm

Back four of Candela, Bergsson, Cahill and Pedders for me....:)
Pfffft.

Burnden Paddock
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3736
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 pm
Location: Bury

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Burnden Paddock » Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:13 pm

bwfcdan94 wrote:We seemed to have a thread similar to this one recently on Knightmare and I stick to what I said in that he is the worst player to play for our club ever.
Dan, Dan, Dan, Dan, Dan! With the greatest of respect, you didn't see some of the players that we had between 1981 and 1987. Probably others before and since then too. Dave Sutton made Knight look like Bobby Moore. Seriously.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14516
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by boltonboris » Mon Aug 19, 2013 9:31 pm

malcd1 wrote:
Norpig wrote:Goal 1 was a mistake by Zat Knight which he nearly managed to get back and rectify but it was ZK fault.
I don't think that was Zat chasing back making that last ditch challenge. I'm positive it was Baptiste.

Look again. You will see Zat ambling back after giving the ball away.
Giving it away after charging out for absolutely no reason and leaving a gaping hole behind him. It was the sort of defending you'd expect from a 12 year old who's never played 11-a-side before.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Hoboh » Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:20 pm

Since 2000-2001 the best we did in goals conceded was in 2005-2006, the defenders we had then that played apart in that season;

Tal Ben Haim
Ricardo Gardner
Bruno N’Gotty
Abdoulaye Faye
Joey O'Brien
Radhi Jaïdi
Nicky Hunt

Top scorer was Stelios with 12

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14516
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by boltonboris » Mon Aug 19, 2013 10:24 pm

Norpig wrote:Well more of an even debate than Knight is rubbish. I am not a fan of Zat I just cannot see why the defence has been singled out. I could have easily have named this post why have we only scored 2 league goals this season?? If the strikers had been more clinical we would be sitting pretty with 6 points making this argument moot.
If the defence wasn't so bad (playing centre backs better than the current ones at RB, despite not being as good a RB as the actual RB who's sat on the bench.. Still with me) we might be able to play a bit further up the pitch and get the ball to the front men and make it stick and not have 2 defensive mids to protect them.. Well, I say protect...
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31734
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Aug 19, 2013 11:48 pm

Knight or Wheater, but not Knight and Wheater.

Rapidly siding with Boris's notion - shift Bap across, bring Mears in, see how that goes. I note Mears and Hayden White played 45 mins each tonight... could he possibly be assessing options?

SmokinFrazier
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:54 am

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by SmokinFrazier » Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:45 am

I'd go with Ream and Wheater for a few games. Ream has generally looked poor in the Championship so far but in his entire time at Bolton, he's only had one sustained period in the side for us and he performed well in that period. There's a chance he won't improve but it's tough for a defender to come in for a game after not playing a game in months and be expected to be up to pace. Ream hasn't played consistently since his first season with us in the Premier League, so I'd like to try him with Wheater for 5 games or so.

I'm not saying he's definitely going to be the answer to our problems but what I do think is that he and Wheater had a good partnership in the past, and playing him for a game every 6 weeks will always lead to disjointed, poor performances. He, like any player, will be off the pace when brought into the first team so sporadically. I don't think Ream is much worse than Knight - if at all - but unlike Knight, there's at least the chance that Ream can improve if he gets game time. We've seen Knight at the best he possibly can be whereas there's likely more to come from Ream, if he's allowed the chance to perform regularly and be a part of a partnership himself.

It might not work but for me, it's better than sticking with something that you know will only ever disappoint.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: A case for Defence (is it really all Zats Fault?)

Post by Hoboh » Tue Aug 20, 2013 3:24 am

SmokinFrazier wrote:I'd go with Ream and Wheater for a few games. Ream has generally looked poor in the Championship so far but in his entire time at Bolton, he's only had one sustained period in the side for us and he performed well in that period. There's a chance he won't improve but it's tough for a defender to come in for a game after not playing a game in months and be expected to be up to pace. Ream hasn't played consistently since his first season with us in the Premier League, so I'd like to try him with Wheater for 5 games or so.

I'm not saying he's definitely going to be the answer to our problems but what I do think is that he and Wheater had a good partnership in the past, and playing him for a game every 6 weeks will always lead to disjointed, poor performances. He, like any player, will be off the pace when brought into the first team so sporadically. I don't think Ream is much worse than Knight - if at all - but unlike Knight, there's at least the chance that Ream can improve if he gets game time. We've seen Knight at the best he possibly can be whereas there's likely more to come from Ream, if he's allowed the chance to perform regularly and be a part of a partnership himself.

It might not work but for me, it's better than sticking with something that you know will only ever disappoint.
No offence smokey but if we are to have a cat in hells chance of staying in touch with the pacemakers and stand a chance of promotion, five games to 'try' a central defender who has hardly proved his worth, even for the tool who bought him, ain't an option.
I agree we need to do something but not that drastic, from what I've seen the midfield and defence need to learn they are on the same team and operate as a unit. With the players we have we never will be prolific scorers which makes clean sheets and 'nicking the odd one' the only way to go, get up quick and get back quicker.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HMX, sonicthewhite and 25 guests