Today I'm angry about.....
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I think on the more modern cars they would switch off with the engine, yeah.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I'm totally confused. I assume these fog lights are on the vehicle in front of you. Don't they turn off when the vehicle switches off the engine? How could they stay on for six weeks? What am I missing? I feel your pain, CH, but it makes no sense to me.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:This is very true and very enraging. Very very very enraging.CrazyHorse wrote:Yeah rears. There was a spot of mist this morning which reduced visibility to about 99%. Ao obviously that meant the fogs went on. What really will make me angry is the fact they forget that they've put them on so I have to put up with the lights still being on for the next month and a half.
But a young dizzy twenty something in her 15 year old Renault Clio Twist will switch them on at the first sign of light mist and then they'll be on permanently until she takes the car in for an MOT next April whereby the man in the garage will turn them off for her.
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
i'm impressed that a dizzy 20 something would even know where her foglamps are! (I bet GG doesn't know!)CrazyHorse wrote:I think on the more modern cars they would switch off with the engine, yeah.Montreal Wanderer wrote:I'm totally confused. I assume these fog lights are on the vehicle in front of you. Don't they turn off when the vehicle switches off the engine? How could they stay on for six weeks? What am I missing? I feel your pain, CH, but it makes no sense to me.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:This is very true and very enraging. Very very very enraging.CrazyHorse wrote:Yeah rears. There was a spot of mist this morning which reduced visibility to about 99%. Ao obviously that meant the fogs went on. What really will make me angry is the fact they forget that they've put them on so I have to put up with the lights still being on for the next month and a half.
But a young dizzy twenty something in her 15 year old Renault Clio Twist will switch them on at the first sign of light mist and then they'll be on permanently until she takes the car in for an MOT next April whereby the man in the garage will turn them off for her.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
They usually find the button by accident whilst looking for the makeup mirror.
Businesswoman of the year.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
CrazyHorse wrote:They usually find the button by accident whilst looking for the makeup mirror.

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Please clarify a little something for me here though Crazy, and I don't wish to be presumptuous, but are you one of those bellends that drives the same whatever the weather? You know the type, the white van driver who passed me at about 90 on the M6 near Brough in the freezing fog/black ice a few years back, only for me to catch him up about a minute later, due to him being a small part of the (probably) 40 car (idiot) pile up. Some nice person had even taken out the "POLICE ACCIDENT SLOW" sign out and taken it with them up the banking of the motorway. nice people.
Just asking like.
Just asking like.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Stop it you two!
I know where the fog light buttons are.
Sexist pigs!

I know where the fog light buttons are.
Sexist pigs!

-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Me? No way. I'm an excellent driver.Lord Kangana wrote:Please clarify a little something for me here though Crazy, and I don't wish to be presumptuous, but are you one of those bellends that drives the same whatever the weather? You know the type, the white van driver who passed me at about 90 on the M6 near Brough in the freezing fog/black ice a few years back, only for me to catch him up about a minute later, due to him being a small part of the (probably) 40 car (idiot) pile up. Some tw*t had even taken out the "POLICE ACCIDENT SLOW" sign out and taken it with them up the banking of the motorway. tw*ts.
Just asking like.
Just like Rainman.
Businesswoman of the year.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Of course he isn't. It's the bellends who require people to have fog lamps in the first place who are bellends. I mean, if you can't see three feet in front of you, you shouldn't be travelling at speed whereby it's necessary to see a fog lamp in order to slow down enough not to crash into the car in front ffs.Lord Kangana wrote:Please clarify a little something for me here though Crazy, and I don't wish to be presumptuous, but are you one of those bellends that drives the same whatever the weather? You know the type, the white van driver who passed me at about 90 on the M6 near Brough in the freezing fog/black ice a few years back, only for me to catch him up about a minute later, due to him being a small part of the (probably) 40 car (idiot) pile up. Some tw*t had even taken out the "POLICE ACCIDENT SLOW" sign out and taken it with them up the banking of the motorway. tw*ts.
Just asking like.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Sorry my mistake you know what I meant to say though don't you.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Well, if he was on a cell phone and used his head for the accelerator you should definitely have reported him for dangerous driving.bwfcdan94 wrote:There is nothing wrong with looking into the direction of traffic but at least look straight ahead before you put your head down on the accelerator.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Yes, hence thebwfcdan94 wrote:Sorry my mistake you know what I meant to say though don't you.Montreal Wanderer wrote:Well, if he was on a cell phone and used his head for the accelerator you should definitely have reported him for dangerous driving.bwfcdan94 wrote:There is nothing wrong with looking into the direction of traffic but at least look straight ahead before you put your head down on the accelerator.

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
The cost of bike maintenance and the price of me being a bit lazy. I've known I've been riding with a chain that has been getting progressively more worn for a while - about 2000 miles on it. Just couldn't be bothered to take my bike in and get it sorted. Anyway, finally took it in yesterday and have had to fork out on a whole new drive train because of the damage it's done 

Re: Today I'm angry about.....
jimbo wrote:The cost of bike maintenance and the price of me being a bit lazy. I've known I've been riding with a chain that has been getting progressively more worn for a while - about 2000 miles on it. Just couldn't be bothered to take my bike in and get it sorted. Anyway, finally took it in yesterday and have had to fork out on a whole new drive train because of the damage it's done
What bike we talkin' about jimbo? I'd be seriously concerned if it's a worn chain on a cycle that requires a new 'drive train'. ( I feckin hate that phrase). If it's a motorbike, ignore the following. If it is a cycle, the only damage that a worn (streched) chain will do, is 'round' or blunt your chainring teeth and cause a little wear to your rear cogs (cassette). Chainrings and a new cassete are a lot cheaper than a whole new chainset. And if this is the case, A; take it to another shop. B; do it yourself, ( lots of advice on lfgss & bike radar, as well as youtube). But C; buy yourself a chain stretch gauge. Also in future if you find the deraileur is slipping gears, buy a new chain, and also check your changer cables for stretch.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Yeah it's chainrings and cassettes that need replacing rather than the whole thing. Just wrote that to simplify it for Bish types! As I said, I'd known the chain was on it's way out for ages but hadn't got round to doing anything about it with working long hours and then wanting to get out and ride at every opportunity. Ah well. I knew the risks - Lesson learned!Il Pirate wrote:jimbo wrote:The cost of bike maintenance and the price of me being a bit lazy. I've known I've been riding with a chain that has been getting progressively more worn for a while - about 2000 miles on it. Just couldn't be bothered to take my bike in and get it sorted. Anyway, finally took it in yesterday and have had to fork out on a whole new drive train because of the damage it's done
What bike we talkin' about jimbo? I'd be seriously concerned if it's a worn chain on a cycle that requires a new 'drive train'. ( I feckin hate that phrase). If it's a motorbike, ignore the following. If it is a cycle, the only damage that a worn (streched) chain will do, is 'round' or blunt your chainring teeth and cause a little wear to your rear cogs (cassette). Chainrings and a new cassete are a lot cheaper than a whole new chainset. And if this is the case, A; take it to another shop. B; do it yourself, ( lots of advice on lfgss & bike radar, as well as youtube). But C; buy yourself a chain stretch gauge. Also in future if you find the deraileur is slipping gears, buy a new chain, and also check your changer cables for stretch.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
thebish wrote:^ a foreign language to me - but damned sexy!!

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Use motorbike chain lube on it will last ages, WD40 and thin oils don't last 2 mins on any chains.jimbo wrote:Yeah it's chainrings and cassettes that need replacing rather than the whole thing. Just wrote that to simplify it for Bish types! As I said, I'd known the chain was on it's way out for ages but hadn't got round to doing anything about it with working long hours and then wanting to get out and ride at every opportunity. Ah well. I knew the risks - Lesson learned!Il Pirate wrote:jimbo wrote:The cost of bike maintenance and the price of me being a bit lazy. I've known I've been riding with a chain that has been getting progressively more worn for a while - about 2000 miles on it. Just couldn't be bothered to take my bike in and get it sorted. Anyway, finally took it in yesterday and have had to fork out on a whole new drive train because of the damage it's done
What bike we talkin' about jimbo? I'd be seriously concerned if it's a worn chain on a cycle that requires a new 'drive train'. ( I feckin hate that phrase). If it's a motorbike, ignore the following. If it is a cycle, the only damage that a worn (streched) chain will do, is 'round' or blunt your chainring teeth and cause a little wear to your rear cogs (cassette). Chainrings and a new cassete are a lot cheaper than a whole new chainset. And if this is the case, A; take it to another shop. B; do it yourself, ( lots of advice on lfgss & bike radar, as well as youtube). But C; buy yourself a chain stretch gauge. Also in future if you find the deraileur is slipping gears, buy a new chain, and also check your changer cables for stretch.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Hoboh wrote:Use motorbike chain lube on it will last ages, WD40 and thin oils don't last 2 mins on any chains.jimbo wrote:Yeah it's chainrings and cassettes that need replacing rather than the whole thing. Just wrote that to simplify it for Bish types! As I said, I'd known the chain was on it's way out for ages but hadn't got round to doing anything about it with working long hours and then wanting to get out and ride at every opportunity. Ah well. I knew the risks - Lesson learned!Il Pirate wrote:jimbo wrote:The cost of bike maintenance and the price of me being a bit lazy. I've known I've been riding with a chain that has been getting progressively more worn for a while - about 2000 miles on it. Just couldn't be bothered to take my bike in and get it sorted. Anyway, finally took it in yesterday and have had to fork out on a whole new drive train because of the damage it's done
What bike we talkin' about jimbo? I'd be seriously concerned if it's a worn chain on a cycle that requires a new 'drive train'. ( I feckin hate that phrase). If it's a motorbike, ignore the following. If it is a cycle, the only damage that a worn (streched) chain will do, is 'round' or blunt your chainring teeth and cause a little wear to your rear cogs (cassette). Chainrings and a new cassete are a lot cheaper than a whole new chainset. And if this is the case, A; take it to another shop. B; do it yourself, ( lots of advice on lfgss & bike radar, as well as youtube). But C; buy yourself a chain stretch gauge. Also in future if you find the deraileur is slipping gears, buy a new chain, and also check your changer cables for stretch.
And double the weight of the bike.

- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
Really, really, really pissed off about the CPS decision 'not in the public interest' not to prosecute the two doctors for ageeing to terminate female foetuses. I mean really pissed off.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I just looked that up .... that is appalling. You are rightly annoyed.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Really, really, really pissed off about the CPS decision 'not in the public interest' not to prosecute the two doctors for ageeing to terminate female foetuses. I mean really pissed off.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: Today I'm angry about.....
I am unfamiliar with the story and could not see it on the BBC website - so i know nothing about the case. However, I do have questions, Spotty.Lost Leopard Spot wrote:Really, really, really pissed off about the CPS decision 'not in the public interest' not to prosecute the two doctors for ageeing to terminate female foetuses. I mean really pissed off.
1. Are you opposed to all abortions regardless of the viability of the foetus(i.e. are you of the right to life persuasion)?
2. Or are you opposed to the women's right to choose?
3. Or are you ticked off because the parents don't want a female child because of some cultural reason (or they already have four daughters and desperately want a son)?
Your reasons are not clear and would make a difference as to whether one might agree with you or not.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests