No Jackett required?

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by LeverEnd » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:17 pm

Yes they are playing very well and complement each other. Ream was at fault yesterday for their goal, I don't see that as luck. He's allowed one though the way he is playing, he's been excellent.
...

Jakerbeef
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1288
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:57 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Jakerbeef » Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:48 pm

jaffka wrote:
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:
jaffka wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
jaffka wrote:Living in that smoggy overcrowded sh*t hole they have to call home is punishment enough.
Point taken, but not everybody that lives nearby is a knuckle-dragging waste of organs. Which implies that they don't have to be.
Not sure what your point is, are you sticking up for them?
I think he is saying that not everyone that lives in London/East London is a knuckle dragging...well, you get the meaning. I used to live in Canary Wharf, a mere stones throw from Millwall (Isle of Dogs is in Millwall), and I as well as most inhabitants were completely normal people and no more racist than anyone from anywhere. DSB lives in London and is a very decent and affable chap.
Thanks for your interpretation of what he meant but the question is directed at him.
That wasn't AT's interpretation. He merely read what DSB posted and understood it.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:12 pm

Was anybody asking you?
Sto ut Serviam

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:38 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Dunno why anyone bothers on here :roll:
Don't sulk, it doesn't become you :D

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:39 pm

Jakerbeef wrote:That wasn't AT's interpretation. He merely read what DSB posted and understood it.
Thanks for that but its still not coming from the horses mouth.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:41 pm

^ to be fair - the original post was entirely from the horse's mouth! he's under no obligation to repeat it! - but then, who asked me! ;-)

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:25 am

Ream still worries me. Their goal is appallingly bad from him. Sunday League wrong side for no reason bad. He's been good recently, so he's allowed a mistake. Just hop it's a blip.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by TANGODANCER » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:33 am

[quote="mummywhycantieatcrayons"Naff" :conf:

Are you speaking Polari?

When I say 'weak' in this context, I am not making a general statement about inconsistency, which is what your examples all seem to speak to.

In Ream's case I am speaking literally about a lack of physical strength.

It sounds like he's been playing well recently, which is great, as we're desperately short of quality at CB, but that goal yesterday is exactly what I think about if I picture Ream's shortcomings - his being shrugged limply out of the way at a very inopportune moment.[/quote]

No idea what polari is mummy? I've watched this incident a dozen times and Ream gets on the wrong side of the player, not gets limply shrugged off. He's inside the area and any challenge there that didn't get the ball would have had Easter down and howling penalty. It was a good ball and a good goal that Easter did very well to score.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:44 am

TANGODANCER wrote:
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Naff" :conf:

Are you speaking Polari?

When I say 'weak' in this context, I am not making a general statement about inconsistency, which is what your examples all seem to speak to.

In Ream's case I am speaking literally about a lack of physical strength.

It sounds like he's been playing well recently, which is great, as we're desperately short of quality at CB, but that goal yesterday is exactly what I think about if I picture Ream's shortcomings - his being shrugged limply out of the way at a very inopportune moment.
No idea what polari is mummy? I've watched this incident a dozen times and Ream gets on the wrong side of the player, not gets limply shrugged off. He's inside the area and any challenge there that didn't get the ball would have had Easter down and howling penalty. It was a good ball and a good goal that Easter did very well to score.
Yes, but he was positioned wrongly to create that possibility. That may be a matter of experience at this level - :conf:
Polari is what they speak in circuses and other hangouts of less salubrious people so you can't understand them.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by boltonboris » Mon Nov 11, 2013 6:15 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:
BL3 wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
ChrisC wrote:
SmokinFrazier wrote:Good result.
Out of interest, would you still sack DF now or stick with him SF?
What makes you think he might not be a clueless know nowt any more?
Talk us through Ream's performance today.
Ream was very good

Hats off to the manager and his staff
Apart from when he cost us another goal by being a bit of a pansy and get arsed off the ball akin to a 6 year old.

Made up for that with the pass, but it's still startling that he gets 'done' by such poor opposition so often.

Good, steady performance by the team though. It's starting to look as if it's coming together now.
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Andy Waller
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1469
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Andy Waller » Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:26 am

Prufrock wrote:Ream still worries me. Their goal is appallingly bad from him. Sunday League wrong side for no reason bad. He's been good recently, so he's allowed a mistake. Just hop it's a blip.

Bloody hell, what do you expect??

We're a (at best) mid table Championship team at the moment. Of course we're going to have players that aren't the best and drop b*llocks every so often.

We look a damn sight better at the back and seem to be going in the right direction.

What would you do differently?
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:00 am

Them to not make school-boy mistakes? Accepting he isn't the best player ever doesn't mean any mistake is OK. If one of the centre-halves in the team I play for had done that it would have been embarrassing.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:05 am

Prufrock wrote:Them to not make school-boy mistakes? Accepting he isn't the best player ever doesn't mean any mistake is OK. If one of the centre-halves in the team I play for had done that it would have been embarrassing.
Correct. In the context of the game, forgivable, even though it got them back to 1-1.

Sat in the ground, I was thinking that the striker must've been offside, to get that much space off the defender.

On the replay, I can now see what happened - which is the defender gave him the acres of space he was stood in.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:14 am

thebish wrote:^ to be fair - the original post was entirely from the horse's mouth! he's under no obligation to repeat it! - but then, who asked me! ;-)
Have I asked a question to the royalty :conf:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by thebish » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:22 am

who asked you??

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:29 am

thebish wrote:who asked you??
Nobody but seeing as I asked the original question I think I have more right to butt into a discussion :wink:

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:41 am

Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them, and who can respond to said questions in passing?

I'm lost on this.

jaffka
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8439
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:36 pm
Location: uk

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by jaffka » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:42 am

LK i believe is the resident list expert.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:44 am

Ohh good spot!

Over to you LK.

We might need a poll to clarify it all too.

Andy Waller
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1469
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 pm

Re: No Jackett required?

Post by Andy Waller » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:11 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Them to not make school-boy mistakes? Accepting he isn't the best player ever doesn't mean any mistake is OK. If one of the centre-halves in the team I play for had done that it would have been embarrassing.
Correct. In the context of the game, forgivable, even though it got them back to 1-1.

Sat in the ground, I was thinking that the striker must've been offside, to get that much space off the defender.

On the replay, I can now see what happened - which is the defender gave him the acres of space he was stood in.
I could understand if we lost, but we didn't?

He's been the best of what we've got (with Mills), so again I ask, what should we do? Drop him?
What a hero, What a man...... Ooooh, what a bad foul...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], knobpolisher, truewhite15 and 47 guests