No Jackett required?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
His running off of the last man is as good as owt you'll see in this division.LeverEnd wrote:I've seen Beckford quite a few times this season and have been far from impressed, but on Saturday he looked like a proper striker. You can see he has gained in confidence and his finish was great. Couldn't believe the miss, but it happens to the best of them. He was also involved in Hall's goal and was making runs all over the place and I bet Shittu and co didn't find him an easy opponent. He's never going to be a great all-round footballer but there were hints that he brings more to the team than just finishing. Whether he'll keep doing either thing remains to be seen.
.
Really plays on the shoulders
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Re: No Jackett required?
And why are people defending Beckford?
I know what a striker is - I've watched SUPER Kevin Davies. For ten years. TEN YEARS.
So when Beckford traps the ball, I scream, almost incoherently, "YOU FOOL - YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CONTROL IT. IT'S MEANT TO BOUNCE OFF YOU AND LAND TEN YARDS AWAY".
And when he makes sensible runs off the ball, I yell, "IDIOT! STAND STILL, WITH YOUR HANDS ON YOUR HIPS".
And when he looks for a team-mate to lay it off to, I shout "MORON! YOU'RE MEANT TO GIVE IT TO THE OPPOSITION".
I simply collapse and weep when he fails to shank it over, or tamely at the keeper, when unmarked and 5 yards out.
BOOO! RUBBISH!
I know what a striker is - I've watched SUPER Kevin Davies. For ten years. TEN YEARS.
So when Beckford traps the ball, I scream, almost incoherently, "YOU FOOL - YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CONTROL IT. IT'S MEANT TO BOUNCE OFF YOU AND LAND TEN YARDS AWAY".
And when he makes sensible runs off the ball, I yell, "IDIOT! STAND STILL, WITH YOUR HANDS ON YOUR HIPS".
And when he looks for a team-mate to lay it off to, I shout "MORON! YOU'RE MEANT TO GIVE IT TO THE OPPOSITION".
I simply collapse and weep when he fails to shank it over, or tamely at the keeper, when unmarked and 5 yards out.
BOOO! RUBBISH!
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
Re: No Jackett required?
One clown near us shouted at him the other day 'Kevin Davies wouldn't have done that'
It was meant in a bad way
How strange
It was meant in a bad way
How strange
Sto ut Serviam
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
He actually took a shot in the second half from near(ish) the half-way line, because he'd spotted the keeper wandering about near the edge of his area. It wasn't particularly close, but good vision to spot that the guy had gone walkabout.CAPSLOCK wrote:One clown near us shouted at him the other day 'Kevin Davies wouldn't have done that'
It was meant in a bad way
How strange
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
What? Scored?CAPSLOCK wrote:One clown near us shouted at him the other day 'Kevin Davies wouldn't have done that'
It was meant in a bad way
How strange
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: No Jackett required?
Yeah, cos the striker who spent his life in the Premier League and competing in Europe, getting an England cap and being instrumental in our 4 consecutive top-8 finishes is of course not a patch on a player who, basically, hasn't done any of that.
Whats it about not having an argument with an idiot?
Whats it about not having an argument with an idiot?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: No Jackett required?
Puskas wrote:And why are people defending Beckford?
I know what a striker is - I've watched SUPER Kevin Davies. For ten years. TEN YEARS.
So when Beckford traps the ball, I scream, almost incoherently, "YOU FOOL - YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CONTROL IT. IT'S MEANT TO BOUNCE OFF YOU AND LAND TEN YARDS AWAY".
And when he makes sensible runs off the ball, I yell, "IDIOT! STAND STILL, WITH YOUR HANDS ON YOUR HIPS".
And when he looks for a team-mate to lay it off to, I shout "MORON! YOU'RE MEANT TO GIVE IT TO THE OPPOSITION".
I simply collapse and weep when he fails to shank it over, or tamely at the keeper, when unmarked and 5 yards out.
BOOO! RUBBISH!
bloody norah - puskas is back in the room!! is it a full moon???
- truewhite15
- Passionate
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:25 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Fcuk me. You wouldn't have thought we'd won 48 hours ago.
Re: No Jackett required?
I think he reads the game ok as a rule, though I'm not too sure how much of that can be coached. Things like spatial awareness and nous you either have or you don't, you can coach someone to fulfil a role, but only within the limits of who they are.bobo the clown wrote:If it's about his ability to read the game, that can be coached.Enoch wrote:So many questions!!Worthy4England wrote:Can we have a list of who's asked what questions and to who they've asked them.....
Here's one, Ream looks like a reasonably intelligent footballer to me, what causes the kind of lapse he had for their goal and how does one go about preventing the like happening again ?
If it's fitness or speed, then you can only be what you are once fully fit.
If it's about a mind which occasionally switches off now & again ... I don't think you can prevent that happening. I think, unfortunately, that it is this. The error on Saturday was due to that and, worse, his reaction once it happened suggested he remained switched off even as play continued.
Like yourself I think he's prone to lapses of concentration. Like yourself I think that's a very hard one to address, Red Bull maybe!!
Whilst this pair have made a difference to our defensive vulnerability, we still don't have anyone back there that can run the game. As for his starting position in the lead up to their goal, I've never before known a coach suggest getting yourself on the wrong side of an opposition striker to be a good thing.

It was a very poor error.
Re: No Jackett required?
Great movement, not afraid to finish either. Assuming he stays fit, it will ultimately be the end of our using the hoof ball. Not least because my dog heads the ball better than Beckford, that doesn't bother me too much, I like the ball on the ground.boltonboris wrote:His running off of the last man is as good as owt you'll see in this division.
Really plays on the shoulders
Re: No Jackett required?
This is not meant as criticism of anyone but I can't think of one Bolton player in my watching lifetime who wasn't prone to "switching off" at least once during a game. Not onePrufrock wrote:Oh don't start with the poppy Nazism.
And as for Ream i'd still be picking him, I just think it's important that, for all the recent improvements, we remember there's a liability in there trying to come out if he doesn't concentrate!
Pfffft.
Re: No Jackett required?
Firstly, he tried to nick a ball he was never going to be able to nick. Secondly, he did it by trying to go the wrong way meaning he got rolled AND the striker was clean-through facing goal. It'd look shit in a Sunday League game.SmokinFrazier wrote:I don't understand what you have against Ream.You constantly have a go at him and it's not just comments saying "he's not good enough" or whatever, there's always an accusation of him being weak, a coward or something like that. It seems personal, for whatever reason.boltonboris wrote:Apart from when he cost us another goal by being a bit of a pansy and get arsed off the ball akin to a 6 year old.
Made up for that with the pass, but it's still startling that he gets 'done' by such poor opposition so often.
Ream's 'mistake' wasn't that bad, anyway. He was initially in a good position but when the pass was struck, it went past a Millwall player who tried to stop it but it had too much pace on it for him, so that caused the pass to go onto their striker very quickly. Ream had no time to adjust his body position and he lost his man. That's not a big deal, certainly nothing like you'd think reading some comments on here. It wasn't good defending but these things can happen. I think Ream probably expecting the first Millwall player to stop the ball but because he missed it, Ream was wrong footed. It was a minor but costly mistake and, unfortunately, these things happen. I'd be more worried about defenders missing tackles or being in the wrong place altogether than these minor things which are very hard to prevent.
He's got form for making a number of horror mistakes. He's also, rightly, been taking the plaudits recently for defending well and adding something on the ball. If you're going to recognise one, you have to recognise the other. Hopefully this will be a one-off and he can get back to how he has been. I do worry that he hasn't really been tested in this good run though.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 19597
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
- Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
- Contact:
Re: No Jackett required?
SF in "give the guy a break" shocker !!!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".
Re: No Jackett required?
aye - and when he does - people STILL jump on him!bobo the clown wrote:SF in "give the guy a break" shocker !!!

-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: No Jackett required?
Puskas wrote:And why are people defending Beckford?
I know what a striker is - I've watched SUPER Kevin Davies. For ten years. TEN YEARS.
So when Beckford traps the ball, I scream, almost incoherently, "YOU FOOL - YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CONTROL IT. IT'S MEANT TO BOUNCE OFF YOU AND LAND TEN YARDS AWAY".
And when he makes sensible runs off the ball, I yell, "IDIOT! STAND STILL, WITH YOUR HANDS ON YOUR HIPS".
And when he looks for a team-mate to lay it off to, I shout "MORON! YOU'RE MEANT TO GIVE IT TO THE OPPOSITION".
I simply collapse and weep when he fails to shank it over, or tamely at the keeper, when unmarked and 5 yards out.
BOOO! RUBBISH!
Genius

They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: No Jackett required?
He's decent around a half chance, but genius is stretching it!
Re: No Jackett required?
Davies would not have scored any of the goals Beckford has scored recently and 'basically' that's all that mattersLord Kangana wrote:Yeah, cos the striker who spent his life in the Premier League and competing in Europe, getting an England cap and being instrumental in our 4 consecutive top-8 finishes is of course not a patch on a player who, basically, hasn't done any of that.
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: No Jackett required?
You're right, as he never played in the Championship for us.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: No Jackett required?
Spot on
Glad to see you didn't fall for his 'efforts' to steal a living last year
Glad to see you didn't fall for his 'efforts' to steal a living last year
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: No Jackett required?
And the converse is also true, that at his peak Beckford is plying his trade for a lower mid-table Championship make-weight side.
But like I said, its a bit pointless arguing with someone who would even start to make the comparison.
But like I said, its a bit pointless arguing with someone who would even start to make the comparison.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests