Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Now don't you go holding no breath!bedwetter2 wrote:Come on then. Spill the beans.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
All the time!bobo the clown wrote:
You're odd T. Has anyone ever told you that ??89bwfc89 wrote:Forum friendsRobbieSavagesLeg wrote:Why can't we all just get along?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Good lord, at least get the syntax right.Enoch wrote:Now don't you go holding no breath!bedwetter2 wrote:Come on then. Spill the beans.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
I feel most distressed that I never hear stories emanating from the Reebok.
How does one go about hearing these? The fact that they emanate conjures up visions of stories spreading out like escaping heat, possibly dissipating by the time they reach the M61.
Is it more subtle? Do you have to stand with a glass pressed to the walls, listening intently?
What's the opposite of ITK? OOTK?
How does one go about hearing these? The fact that they emanate conjures up visions of stories spreading out like escaping heat, possibly dissipating by the time they reach the M61.
Is it more subtle? Do you have to stand with a glass pressed to the walls, listening intently?
What's the opposite of ITK? OOTK?
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Have I descended into a parallel universe populated solely by cyclops? (Is there a plural for cyclops? Cyclopes perhaps?).
Let me be explicit (fnarr) I am being asked, without questioning, indeed without the questioning of anyone at all it seems, to believe that Douglas Freedman's best work is not being done on the pitch, but elsewhere.
May I ask, if I can be so bold as to ask a question, where the f*ck elsewhere in a football club is? In the day and age of having a manager for everything, a "managers" role is now more akin to what we classically understand to be a head coach. Gone are the days of Bruce Rioch, and painting a few lines on the terraces and giving the crush barriers a touch of Hammerite. So what, specifically, is it he's, in bish's word's, doing so perfectly obviously? Please, spell it out.
And secondly, considering this isn't being conducted in the public arena, where is this information is coming from? Or is it so obvious we don't need to ask?
Let me be explicit (fnarr) I am being asked, without questioning, indeed without the questioning of anyone at all it seems, to believe that Douglas Freedman's best work is not being done on the pitch, but elsewhere.
May I ask, if I can be so bold as to ask a question, where the f*ck elsewhere in a football club is? In the day and age of having a manager for everything, a "managers" role is now more akin to what we classically understand to be a head coach. Gone are the days of Bruce Rioch, and painting a few lines on the terraces and giving the crush barriers a touch of Hammerite. So what, specifically, is it he's, in bish's word's, doing so perfectly obviously? Please, spell it out.
And secondly, considering this isn't being conducted in the public arena, where is this information is coming from? Or is it so obvious we don't need to ask?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Lord Kangana wrote:
Let me be explicit (fnarr) I am being asked, without questioning, indeed without the questioning of anyone at all it seems, to believe that Douglas Freedman's best work is not being done on the pitch, but elsewhere.
Can you show me where you are being asked this and tell me by whom? I'm sceptical.
Last edited by thebish on Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
well - to me - and this is usually by internet stream (so you may know better) - it's perfectly obvious by watching the games that we have more of a clue what we are doing than we did under owen coyle.Lord Kangana wrote:How is it perfectly obvious?
it also seems perfectly obvious to me that Freedman has a plan - and he is executing it - and it looks like he is successfully replacing big-contract wasters with hard-working battlers.
that may not seem obvious to you - but it does to me.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Have you been watching some games then thebish?
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
William the White wrote:Have you been watching some games then thebish?

Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
As someone once said, 'Lord Kangana wrote:Good lord, at least get the syntax right.Enoch wrote:Now don't you go holding no breath!

Not to mention:
Lord Kangana wrote:where is this information is coming from?

Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
I'm with Bish on this one we have gone from a side who could not keep out a pair of toddlers to a team that is near impregnable, for those of you who saw what was truly a defensive master class at Watford and at Bournemouth for that matter will agree. We have been turned in a matter of weeks from one of the worst teams defensively top one of the best and I now go into games confident for the first since Sam's days that if we go 1-0 up then it is very very unlikely hat we are going to lose the game and quite likely that we will win the game.thebish wrote:well - to me - and this is usually by internet stream (so you may know better) - it's perfectly obvious by watching the games that we have more of a clue what we are doing than we did under owen coyle.Lord Kangana wrote:How is it perfectly obvious?
it also seems perfectly obvious to me that Freedman has a plan - and he is executing it - and it looks like he is successfully replacing big-contract wasters with hard-working battlers.
that may not seem obvious to you - but it does to me.
The above post is complete bollox/garbage/nonsense, please point this out to me at any and every occasion possible.
-
- Promising
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:21 am
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Anyone got any funny GIF's?
:YAWN:
:YAWN:
I'd rather support Bolton than be you.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
You joined in further up the thread!RobbieSavagesLeg wrote:Anyone got any funny GIF's?
:YAWN:
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
RobbieSavagesLeg wrote:Anyone got any funny GIF's?
:YAWN:


Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Stop winding him up, he said funny.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
Enoch wrote:Stop winding him up, he said funny.
Sorry Enoch

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
I thought it were proper funny, Chris.ChrisC wrote:Enoch wrote:Stop winding him up, he said funny.
Sorry Enoch

May the bridges I burn light your way
Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
At least it brightened up someone's morningBruce Rioja wrote:I thought it were proper funny, Chris.ChrisC wrote:Enoch wrote:Stop winding him up, he said funny.
Sorry Enoch

Re: Three in a row? Pozzotively. No sting in this tale!
He thought he could jump through the ice. He didn't realise how thick is was.LeverEnd wrote:I don't get it.
That is my guess anyway

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests