The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
£2.5million including the buyer's premium.Worthy4England wrote:Messy Bed. £2.2m...
The world's gone fcuking mad.
As I say, as famous memorabilia, that seems cheap. I thought it might do £3million.
As ever, things not all as they seem in the art world, however. The winning bidder was Jay Jopling, founder owner of the White Cube Gallery, who deal in the work of... Tracey Emin. http://whitecube.com/artists/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The Bacon study of Lucian Freud is great. I saw it at the weekend - about A4 size, so not really pocket-sized. It's a shame Roald Dahl's family chose to sell all his Bacon stuff. I was interested to learn of Dahl and Bacon's mutal admiration.
- Attachments
-
- dahl.JPG (84.8 KiB) Viewed 1189 times
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Strange man indeed. He didn't paint complimentary pictures of his friends is for sure. No chocolate box artist was he. There's an extensive article on Bacon and his art here:
http://www.alexalienart.com/alexgallery1a.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Be warned, it is lengthy.
http://www.alexalienart.com/alexgallery1a.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Be warned, it is lengthy.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Can't pretend to be much of a fan of abstract art, but this by Australian artist Simon Brushfield made me look twice, then again trying to see into it. Something really attractive about it:


Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The Great Art Debate
Might be a nice painting. Have you got one in focus as the quality of the photo is terrible?
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
malcd1 wrote:Might be a nice painting. Have you got one in focus as the quality of the photo is terrible?

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Yesterday morning i was at Tate Britain to see Phyllida Barlow's installation 'Dock'.
It is stunning. huge. in a gallery one hundred metres long, high vaulted ceilings, filled with multiple installations on a monumental scale but made with the most fragile of materials.
The docks are long gone, of course, and this seems to speak of that decay, that ruin, that crash.
A rave review from the Guardian and some pics here... http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign ... ain-review" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It's free. it needs to be seen.
The additional treat for me was being able to whiz round the Henry Moore galleries next door.
This was the last of four exhibitions i caught in a long weekend in london.
In some ways the one I enjoyed most was in the city, at a law firm, where an extremely passionate and insightful curator showed 20 of us round an exhibition inspired by the theme of conflict.
His name was Jon Crayons, and, I gather, he has a questionable relationship with his mother. But has the good sense to stand up for Tracey Emin.
It is stunning. huge. in a gallery one hundred metres long, high vaulted ceilings, filled with multiple installations on a monumental scale but made with the most fragile of materials.
The docks are long gone, of course, and this seems to speak of that decay, that ruin, that crash.
A rave review from the Guardian and some pics here... http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign ... ain-review" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It's free. it needs to be seen.
The additional treat for me was being able to whiz round the Henry Moore galleries next door.
This was the last of four exhibitions i caught in a long weekend in london.
In some ways the one I enjoyed most was in the city, at a law firm, where an extremely passionate and insightful curator showed 20 of us round an exhibition inspired by the theme of conflict.
His name was Jon Crayons, and, I gather, he has a questionable relationship with his mother. But has the good sense to stand up for Tracey Emin.

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Re: The Great Art Debate
Is he the one who used to play golf for Sioux, Grabbit and Runne, but turned artistic and moved to S&S? Actually I couldn't find him listed in the firm's people search function.William the White wrote:Yesterday morning i was at Tate Britain to see Phyllida Barlow's installation 'Dock'.
It is stunning. huge. in a gallery one hundred metres long, high vaulted ceilings, filled with multiple installations on a monumental scale but made with the most fragile of materials.
The docks are long gone, of course, and this seems to speak of that decay, that ruin, that crash.
A rave review from the Guardian and some pics here... http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign ... ain-review" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
It's free. it needs to be seen.
The additional treat for me was being able to whiz round the Henry Moore galleries next door.
This was the last of four exhibitions i caught in a long weekend in london.
In some ways the one I enjoyed most was in the city, at a law firm, where an extremely passionate and insightful curator showed 20 of us round an exhibition inspired by the theme of conflict.
His name was Jon Crayons, and, I gather, he has a questionable relationship with his mother. But has the good sense to stand up for Tracey Emin.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Re: The Great Art Debate
Interesting... I suspect I'm too junior for them to think me worth searching for, but good to know nonetheless!
Thanks for your kind words, Will - glad you and your friends and family enjoyed it.
Thanks for your kind words, Will - glad you and your friends and family enjoyed it.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Re: The Great Art Debate
Artwork for the gullible.
I normally call a artwork of this type - a bonfire. That is all it is worth. Give me a match and some spuds.
I normally call a artwork of this type - a bonfire. That is all it is worth. Give me a match and some spuds.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Er, thanks. That explains it.This work sparks the dialogue, exemplifying impactful visualisation in an authentic, real-world scenario, allowing the viewer to properly catagorise the contributions of the 'other' in a parallel space while keeping within the tradition of urban social community practice. This irregularity distracts from the artists' gaze, fixed upon shifting centres and past a capitalistic cosmopolitanism blind to the intersectionalities inherent in any work of colour.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Where is that quote from Tango?TANGODANCER wrote:Er, thanks. That explains it.This work sparks the dialogue, exemplifying impactful visualisation in an authentic, real-world scenario, allowing the viewer to properly catagorise the contributions of the 'other' in a parallel space while keeping within the tradition of urban social community practice. This irregularity distracts from the artists' gaze, fixed upon shifting centres and past a capitalistic cosmopolitanism blind to the intersectionalities inherent in any work of colour.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
I may have this wrong, and forgive me if I do, but are you the poster that thinks van Gogh can't paint?malcd1 wrote:Artwork for the gullible.
I normally call a artwork of this type - a bonfire. That is all it is worth. Give me a match and some spuds.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I would say more overrated. I quite like one of his self-portraits.William the White wrote:I may have this wrong, and forgive me if I do, but are you the poster that thinks van Gogh can't paint?malcd1 wrote:Artwork for the gullible.
I normally call a artwork of this type - a bonfire. That is all it is worth. Give me a match and some spuds.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
Re: The Great Art Debate
I think I may have also described Tracey Emin a chancer. If I haven't then I have now.
Do not trust atoms. They make up everything.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Cut and pasted from the comments section of the link you gave Will,William the White wrote:Where is that quote from Tango?TANGODANCER wrote:Er, thanks. That explains it.This work sparks the dialogue, exemplifying impactful visualisation in an authentic, real-world scenario, allowing the viewer to properly catagorise the contributions of the 'other' in a parallel space while keeping within the tradition of urban social community practice. This irregularity distracts from the artists' gaze, fixed upon shifting centres and past a capitalistic cosmopolitanism blind to the intersectionalities inherent in any work of colour.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Made me laugh...malcd1 wrote:I think I may have also described Tracey Emin a chancer. If I haven't then I have now.
I'll avoid picking up the Tracey Emin offering - it will get the clown raving and the dancer foaming and the obdurate bastard grunting, and there's only so much fun i can take on a Tuesday evening.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Ah, I didn't read any of that - I knew it wasn't in the review, obviously.TANGODANCER wrote:Cut and pasted from the comments section of the link you gave Will,William the White wrote:Where is that quote from Tango?TANGODANCER wrote:Er, thanks. That explains it.This work sparks the dialogue, exemplifying impactful visualisation in an authentic, real-world scenario, allowing the viewer to properly catagorise the contributions of the 'other' in a parallel space while keeping within the tradition of urban social community practice. This irregularity distracts from the artists' gaze, fixed upon shifting centres and past a capitalistic cosmopolitanism blind to the intersectionalities inherent in any work of colour.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: The Great Art Debate
Ah, I didn't read any of that - I knew it wasn't in the review, obviously.TANGODANCER wrote:Cut and pasted from the comments section of the link you gave Will,William the White wrote:Where is that quote from Tango?TANGODANCER wrote:Er, thanks. That explains it.This work sparks the dialogue, exemplifying impactful visualisation in an authentic, real-world scenario, allowing the viewer to properly catagorise the contributions of the 'other' in a parallel space while keeping within the tradition of urban social community practice. This irregularity distracts from the artists' gaze, fixed upon shifting centres and past a capitalistic cosmopolitanism blind to the intersectionalities inherent in any work of colour.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The Great Art Debate
Van Gogh's struggle to express himself is really intriguing. You can almost feel his moods, frustrations and changes of direction in his paintings. I've learned quite a lot from him.William the White wrote:I may have this wrong, and forgive me if I do, but are you the poster that thinks van Gogh can't paint?malcd1 wrote:Artwork for the gullible.
I normally call a artwork of this type - a bonfire. That is all it is worth. Give me a match and some spuds.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests