The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:05 pm

According to the latest statistics, based on data collected at the start of 2013, there are around 4.9m businesses currently operating in the UK.
The Confederation of British Industry is a UK business organisation, speaking for some 1500 direct members, including companies, many universities and other public bodies as well as trade association members.
Who gives a fcuk that 80% of a small, overblown, up it's own ass, band of villains would vote to stay in the EU? Why does anyone waste time on this bunch of tax avoiding pricks who hardly speak for their own workforce never mind their owners the shareholders.

On another subject

Chuka Umunna,
No chance!
Umunna was one of 73 Labour MPs to nominate Ed Miliband in the 2010 Labour leadership election to find a successor to Gordon Brown.
I got private education and I'm a lawyer (Yeah likable just the same as tax inspectors and traffic wardens) so I know all about working life.

Yvette Cooper
She's a Jock,
She is married to fellow Labour politician Ed Balls so she should be Yvette Balls!
Look at her career she hardly has any experience outside of politics.

Alan Johnson
Now reading his background I can see a true proper socialist in this bloke and not lipstick ones like the two above, actually think he's what labour need to connect back to their roots

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 10, 2014 4:10 pm

The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Mon Nov 10, 2014 4:25 pm

I personally think they speak as members, but there you go.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:44 pm

Worthy4England wrote:The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...
Your playing with it Worthy
The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce
They represent about a third of directors of private companies and they are not a democratic institution you can vote for.
Do try harder. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:45 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I personally think they speak as members, but there you go.
Agreed, limp members :D

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 10, 2014 7:06 pm

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...
Your playing with it Worthy
The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce
They represent about a third of directors of private companies and they are not a democratic institution you can vote for.
Do try harder. :mrgreen:
Give over. You picked them out because they happen to think differently than you. The good news is, if they're that insignificant, there's no problem with it, so not really worth you mentioning it. Are you suggesting in your crusade (which I think you've mentioned on multiple occasions) should be more democratic, that this group should just shut up, because they don't have the same view as you?

I'm surprised we're not getting levied an additional EU bullshit tax with all the posts you make... :roll:

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:28 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...
Your playing with it Worthy
The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce
They represent about a third of directors of private companies and they are not a democratic institution you can vote for.
Do try harder. :mrgreen:
Give over. You picked them out because they happen to think differently than you. The good news is, if they're that insignificant, there's no problem with it, so not really worth you mentioning it. Are you suggesting in your crusade (which I think you've mentioned on multiple occasions) should be more democratic, that this group should just shut up, because they don't have the same view as you?

I'm surprised we're not getting levied an additional EU bullshit tax with all the posts you make... :roll:
Sore loser :mrgreen:

Actually I have nothing against the CBI except the overblown importance they are given by some.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:21 pm

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... l-election" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The cuts being planned for the second parliament are likely to be tougher to sell politically partly because the public is not as prepared as in 2010 in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Tax receipts are also lower than had been anticipated, partly because of changes in the labour market, such as an increase in the number of young people in low-paid employment and in the numbers of self-employed.

A commitment by Cameron to protect spending on the NHS from cuts would mean that the impact will be felt more severely elsewhere. Cuts will again squeeze the police, the Ministry of Defence, legal aid and the business department including further education funding, student maintenance loans and science research.
Is there no end to the stupidity of these bastards?
Seems we cannot afford your wars Davey boy, nor drug enforcement or anything at all!
How come the rich chums get fatter while everyone else starves?

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:37 pm

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...
Your playing with it Worthy
The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce
They represent about a third of directors of private companies and they are not a democratic institution you can vote for.
Do try harder. :mrgreen:
Give over. You picked them out because they happen to think differently than you. The good news is, if they're that insignificant, there's no problem with it, so not really worth you mentioning it. Are you suggesting in your crusade (which I think you've mentioned on multiple occasions) should be more democratic, that this group should just shut up, because they don't have the same view as you?

I'm surprised we're not getting levied an additional EU bullshit tax with all the posts you make... :roll:
Sore loser :mrgreen:

Actually I have nothing against the CBI except the overblown importance they are given by some.
You mean when they disagree with you?

I don't think I've lost anything so don't feel particularly sore.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:55 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce. So I could see how you could say that wasn't at all representative of anything, compared to say UKIP who have 35,000 members which is around 0.07% of the electorate.

Who gives a fcuk that a party with less than 0.08% of the electorate as members think it's a good idea not to be in the EU (I've rounded it up a bit to allow for Darryl Hannan who isn't a member)? At least they manage to speak for some of their members (but probably not all of them)...
Your playing with it Worthy
The CBI represents businesses that cover around a third of the private workforce
They represent about a third of directors of private companies and they are not a democratic institution you can vote for.
Do try harder. :mrgreen:
Give over. You picked them out because they happen to think differently than you. The good news is, if they're that insignificant, there's no problem with it, so not really worth you mentioning it. Are you suggesting in your crusade (which I think you've mentioned on multiple occasions) should be more democratic, that this group should just shut up, because they don't have the same view as you?

I'm surprised we're not getting levied an additional EU bullshit tax with all the posts you make... :roll:
Sore loser :mrgreen:

Actually I have nothing against the CBI except the overblown importance they are given by some.
You mean when they disagree with you?

I don't think I've lost anything so don't feel particularly sore.
Listen to the CBI and bankers and get 30 billion cuts :mrgreen:

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24859
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:55 pm

Importance by whom? You quoted them?

4.9m businesses? That's one for every fifteen people. Either we're counting the dormant companies owned by nutters who have 20 dormant companies so they can swell their heads claiming to be director of 20 companies, or we're including domiciled companies who I'm sure you'll agree, being foreign, don't represent popular opinion. I'd be much more likely to give weight to Worthy's point that they employ 1/3rd of the work-force in deciding whether or not they're representative. Doesn't mean I'd agree with them, but they carry more weight than 1 seat in parliament.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24859
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:56 pm

Hoboh wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... l-election
The cuts being planned for the second parliament are likely to be tougher to sell politically partly because the public is not as prepared as in 2010 in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. Tax receipts are also lower than had been anticipated, partly because of changes in the labour market, such as an increase in the number of young people in low-paid employment and in the numbers of self-employed.

A commitment by Cameron to protect spending on the NHS from cuts would mean that the impact will be felt more severely elsewhere. Cuts will again squeeze the police, the Ministry of Defence, legal aid and the business department including further education funding, student maintenance loans and science research.
Is there no end to the stupidity of these bastards?
Seems we cannot afford your wars Davey boy, nor drug enforcement or anything at all!
How come the rich chums get fatter while everyone else starves?
That's a bit red.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Mon Nov 10, 2014 11:57 pm

Prufrock wrote:Importance by whom? You quoted them?

4.9m businesses? That's one for every fifteen people. Either we're counting the dormant companies owned by nutters who have 20 dormant companies so they can swell their heads claiming to be director of 20 companies, or we're including domiciled companies who I'm sure you'll agree, being foreign, don't represent popular opinion. I'd be much more likely to give weight to Worthy's point that they employ 1/3rd of the work-force in deciding whether or not they're representative. Doesn't mean I'd agree with them, but they carry more weight than 1 seat in parliament.
Soon to be two and maybe a few more before May :mrgreen:

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24859
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:04 am

I dunno what to make of this:



Firstly, whilst when rarely exposed to him I find Russel Brand charming, he's currently doing my head in because he's appearing seemingly everywhere as the left's "answer to Boris Johnson" despite being nowhere near as clever as he thinks he is, a full-on spiritualist and that question not needing an answer. More, I give absolutely no credit to anyone simply for "having the nuts to laugh at himself".

Nevertheless, I bloody love the rubberbandits. So...you know.

PS. This counts as politics now. Not like before, with John Lennon.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Nov 11, 2014 12:19 am

Hoboh wrote:Listen to the CBI and bankers and get 30 billion cuts :mrgreen:
Hold on. You've moved again. When you started this, there seemed to be some problem with the CBI representing their members on the topic of the EU - which I think democratically they have every right to do. Now you're on about the cuts we're still facing which were predominantly caused by businesses. So diddly squat to do with the EU. Please ask your cat what you're trying to argue here and we'll see if we can make any more fcking sense of it.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:35 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Listen to the CBI and bankers and get 30 billion cuts :mrgreen:
Hold on. You've moved again. When you started this, there seemed to be some problem with the CBI representing their members on the topic of the EU - which I think democratically they have every right to do. Now you're on about the cuts we're still facing which were predominantly caused by businesses. So diddly squat to do with the EU. Please ask your cat what you're trying to argue here and we'll see if we can make any more fcking sense of it.
You should stop trying to be clever, I have not said the CBI has no right to speak for it's members, merely the press and Europhiles such as yourself and the odd looney who drops in from time to time put the case across as if they represent all the employees which clearly they don't. In my experience over the thirty odd years or so, most employees view the CBI as the gaffers union or the union of toffs, not interested in the country's well being only their balance sheets.
Cuts have nothing to do with the EU? FFS if we stopped pouring money hand over fist into an alien system we wouldn't have to be making these cuts, add up how many billions have gone this way since membership so French peasant farmers and a whole host of never do wells enjoy the spoils, I'd wager it would be frightening.
I rather chat with my cat than the half wits you must mix with, she makes more fcking sense.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:15 am

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
Hoboh wrote:Listen to the CBI and bankers and get 30 billion cuts :mrgreen:
Hold on. You've moved again. When you started this, there seemed to be some problem with the CBI representing their members on the topic of the EU - which I think democratically they have every right to do. Now you're on about the cuts we're still facing which were predominantly caused by businesses. So diddly squat to do with the EU. Please ask your cat what you're trying to argue here and we'll see if we can make any more fcking sense of it.
You should stop trying to be clever, I have not said the CBI has no right to speak for it's members, merely the press and Europhiles such as yourself and the odd looney who drops in from time to time put the case across as if they represent all the employees which clearly they don't. In my experience over the thirty odd years or so, most employees view the CBI as the gaffers union or the union of toffs, not interested in the country's well being only their balance sheets.
Cuts have nothing to do with the EU? FFS if we stopped pouring money hand over fist into an alien system we wouldn't have to be making these cuts, add up how many billions have gone this way since membership so French peasant farmers and a whole host of never do wells enjoy the spoils, I'd wager it would be frightening.
I rather chat with my cat than the half wits you must mix with, she makes more fcking sense.
Can you remember what you posted yesterday morning, or is that a bit of a stretch for you?
Who gives a fcuk that 80% of a small, overblown, up it's own ass, band of villains would vote to stay in the EU? Why does anyone waste time on this bunch of tax avoiding pricks who hardly speak for their own workforce never mind their owners the shareholders
That seemed to be suggesting that they should just shut up and go away because apparently nobody cares about what they have to say. Of course they're not an employees union and don't represent the workforce - which doesn't alter the fact that their members actually employ a fair proportion of it. You would think that they would and should have a view on how being in or being out of the EU would effect their members balance sheets and ergo a fair proportion of our economic performance.

The last bit on the cuts being impacted by our EU membership is where, as ever, I always have a few problems - where is your 30 million coming from? What does the number represent? I assumed because you'd linked it directly to the CBI and Bankers that is must've referred to the 2008 meltdown as you associated the two things in the same sentence. It was only a short sentence, so I could have been wrong as I'd need to know how your mind worked and I think that would take medical training and suchlike, so perhaps you can help us out a little.

I'll stop trying to be clever, if you start trying to be clever - does that work for you?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:40 am

^ this just isn't a fair fight!

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34833
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:50 am

http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/rp13-42.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is the latest (I think) Government Briefing paper on the subject. I'm sure there's plenty of random quotes Hobes can cut n paste from it.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13663
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Fri Nov 14, 2014 12:28 am

But Major challenged Merkel and other EU leaders who have said that they cannot countenance any change to the free movement of people on the grounds that it is one of the four freedoms enshrined in the EEC’s founding Treaty of Rome in 1957, those being the free movement of people, capital, goods and services.

The former prime minister said EU leaders were in no position to offer lectures on the four freedoms because the other three have never been properly implemented.
He said: “I hear it said by eminent Europeans that freedom of movement is sacrosanct. It is one of the four freedoms set out in the founding treaty. The argument is that if we tamper with freedom of movement, the other freedoms will fall.
“I understand that view but it has a flaw. Twenty-five years after the Single European Act, the other founding freedoms are not fully honoured by the EU. Not one of them. If freedom of movement is immutable, when will member states complete the single market? When will they end closed shops and protectionism, and open their markets to British services – especially our professional services? When will they fully integrate capital markets? Or the energy market? Or digital? Need I go on? If these had been implemented in full, then Britain’s case on free movement would be weakened. But they are not.”
Seems one of the British 'Godfathers' of the EU agrees it doesn't deliver!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests