F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Not really high risk 70 yards up the pitch. It's Timothy the defensive 'creator' I worry about.CAPSLOCK wrote:Indeed
High risk passes are often the high reward ones and sometimes need to be attempted
Especially when your team isn't packed with 'footballers'
What you don't want is high risk passes with a potentially low return
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
-
- Reliable
- Posts: 673
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:01 am
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
CAPSLOCK wrote:Indeed
High risk passes are often the high reward ones and sometimes need to be attempted
Especially when your team isn't packed with 'footballers'
What you don't want is high risk passes with a potentially low return
For example, volleyed cross-field back heel just outside your own box, like JayJay did v Manchester United, (which sent SA apoplectic!)

- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Oh I agree, Boz, I get bored watching unpenetrative tiki-taka, but that's not what I'm suggesting. There were a couple of instances in which Chungy was double-marked, with Clayton unattended five yards to the side and Vela free five yards behind him, in which case the sensible option was to lay off and move. Instead, Chungy tried to turn inside, ran into a wall of opponents, lost the ball and Reading were on the front foot. Trust me, if you'd been that full-back, you'd have had a go at him.boltonboris wrote:I can forgive Chungy for this personally. Now I know everyone lives a cliched 'play the simple pass' I sometimes think its a load of bollocks.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:It wasn't terrible, they were definitely trying with more awareness than of recent years, but the pass selection was frequently poor - Chungy in particular lost the ball four or five times by trying and failing to turn his man rather than laying off to a bystanding team-mate.
Every team should have one or two players with the license to affect the game by ignoring the simple things. Ultimately those players win you more games than they lose.
Nothing more frustrating than seeing a good player move a 5 yard square pass just for the sake of it. What's it going to achieve?
There were also a couple of cases in which, by excellence of movement, he found himself running at the defence with space to play a pass into - to Feeney, or Clayton, or whichever centre-forward was on at the time - but didn't select the right option, or didn't execute it well enough.
I admire Chungy, by the way: this isn't a character assassination. He made some things happen in a way no other (fit, current) Bolton player could, and which must have made Prats rub his eyes. I'm just saying that he's far from immune to what I see as our next big problem: choosing which pass to make. We're now having majority possession and look much more solid (notwithstanding Caps' correct concerns on crosses), but we lack a cutting edge and it's not entirely down to inefficiency of taking chances: we should have made more chances too.
Chungy wasn't alone in making the wrong choices: in the second half, Clayton was gingerly progressing toward goal when Vela powered past him on an excellent unchecked overlap, but Max held on to the ball instead of laying it into Josh's path. Vela threw his hands up in the air in exasperation, not look-at-me vainglory but an opportunity missed. It's not as if we're lethal in chance conversion, but I also think we're missing a lot of opportunities by not creating them.
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
This thread title didn't seem to deliver the expected result.
I'm not convinced thread titles really affect match results if I'm honest.
I'm not convinced thread titles really affect match results if I'm honest.
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
^ meanwhile, in one devastating and shattering blow....Enoch wrote:This thread title didn't seem to deliver the expected result.
I'm not convinced thread titles really affect match results if I'm honest.

Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Such innocence!
Whatever next will be learnt?
The world isn't flat...no!!!
F**k me!
Whatever next will be learnt?
The world isn't flat...no!!!
F**k me!
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1967
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Thought I might have been a bit harsh when I noticed something similar in the Huddersfield game... but if someone else noticed it that makes me feel betterDave Sutton's barnet wrote:Chungy wasn't alone in making the wrong choices: in the second half, Clayton was gingerly progressing toward goal when Vela powered past him on an excellent unchecked overlap, but Max held on to the ball instead of laying it into Josh's path. Vela threw his hands up in the air in exasperation, not look-at-me vainglory but an opportunity missed. It's not as if we're lethal in chance conversion, but I also think we're missing a lot of opportunities by not creating them.

The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball.
Agree that he can be careless at times (Chungy), but I'd rather him try things..
Agree that he can be careless at times (Chungy), but I'd rather him try things..
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Tell it to Vela. Or for that matter Pablo Zabaleta.boltonboris wrote:Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball
If you say "Full-backs don't always overlap so they can receive the ball," we might be in agreement...
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Have to say I thought Clayton and Vela worked really well together when he switched to that side, and was impressed generally with Vela defensively he seems to read things well and cut out the danger. He'll get better with more experience in the position. Couldn't help but wonder why we didn't keep Chris Eagles though.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Tell it to Vela. Or for that matter Pablo Zabaleta.boltonboris wrote:Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball
If you say "Full-backs don't always overlap so they can receive the ball," we might be in agreement...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Two words: Dougie Freedman.Beefheart wrote: Couldn't help but wonder why we didn't keep Chris Eagles though.
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Alright, alright.. What I meant was when they go past, they go past with the intention of taking a defender away and letting the winger 1 v 1, or inside.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Tell it to Vela. Or for that matter Pablo Zabaleta.boltonboris wrote:Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball
If you say "Full-backs don't always overlap so they can receive the ball," we might be in agreement...
They should expect that they might receive the ball, but that's not the reason they go up
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
I'm not sure he wanted to stay, did he? maybe I'm misremberising!Beefheart wrote:Have to say I thought Clayton and Vela worked really well together when he switched to that side, and was impressed generally with Vela defensively he seems to read things well and cut out the danger. He'll get better with more experience in the position. Couldn't help but wonder why we didn't keep Chris Eagles though.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Tell it to Vela. Or for that matter Pablo Zabaleta.boltonboris wrote:Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball
If you say "Full-backs don't always overlap so they can receive the ball," we might be in agreement...
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31613
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Yeah, agreed. Although in this case Clayton was already 1v1 and Vela wasn't being tracked by anyone so it was essentially a free pass - again, wrong selection.boltonboris wrote:Alright, alright.. What I meant was when they go past, they go past with the intention of taking a defender away and letting the winger 1 v 1, or inside.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:Tell it to Vela. Or for that matter Pablo Zabaleta.boltonboris wrote:Fair enough DSB, but full backs don't overlap so they can receive the ball
If you say "Full-backs don't always overlap so they can receive the ball," we might be in agreement...
They should expect that they might receive the ball, but that's not the reason they go up
Re: F*ck these Royals c*nt's arses - Reading (A) 06/12/14
Have another fourTANGODANCER wrote:Two words: Dougie Freedman.Beefheart wrote: Couldn't help but wonder why we didn't keep Chris Eagles though.
Seventeen thousand pounds, Blackpool
Sto ut Serviam
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 23 guests