Signings

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Signings

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:56 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm a c*nt in real life too, so I've nowt to lose.
Excellent. Good one. Nice one. :conf:
May the bridges I burn light your way

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: Signings

Post by Lord Kangana » Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:19 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Sponge wrote:It's interesting how posting anonymously on an internet forum can turn one into a c*nt without one even realising it.
...and all too frequently with full realisation. Not you, Sponge, which is why it seemed somewhat out of character...
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:24 pm

McKee says some interesting things in that piece, but this made me chuckle:
I supported Celtic as a boy so that was the ultimate for me, especially at 18.
What was the ultimate? Scoring for Celtic in the Champions League final? Scoring for Celtic? Appearing for Celtic? Appearing at Parkhead?

No, being on the bench against Rangers.

Set your sights low and you won't be disappointed.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Signings

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:28 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:McKee says some interesting things in that piece, but this made me chuckle:
I supported Celtic as a boy so that was the ultimate for me, especially at 18.
What was the ultimate? Scoring for Celtic in the Champions League final? Scoring for Celtic? Appearing for Celtic? Appearing at Parkhead?

No, being on the bench against Rangers.

Set your sights low and you won't be disappointed.
I wonder DSB if its just poorly written as I assumed it referred to him making his debut against Celtic at 18 rather than being on the bench against Rangers.

It is confusing, but I think thats what he means......

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Signings

Post by Gary the Enfield » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:37 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:McKee says some interesting things in that piece, but this made me chuckle:
I supported Celtic as a boy so that was the ultimate for me, especially at 18.
What was the ultimate? Scoring for Celtic in the Champions League final? Scoring for Celtic? Appearing for Celtic? Appearing at Parkhead?

No, being on the bench against Rangers.

Set your sights low and you won't be disappointed.
I wonder DSB if its just poorly written as I assumed it referred to him making his debut against Celtic at 18 rather than being on the bench against Rangers.

It is confusing, but I think thats what he means......

I thought it went on to say he was on the pitch for the last 15 to 20 minutes?

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:51 pm

Ha! Maybe so.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Signings

Post by Worthy4England » Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:40 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:McKee says some interesting things in that piece, but this made me chuckle:
I supported Celtic as a boy so that was the ultimate for me, especially at 18.
What was the ultimate? Scoring for Celtic in the Champions League final? Scoring for Celtic? Appearing for Celtic? Appearing at Parkhead?

No, being on the bench against Rangers.

Set your sights low and you won't be disappointed.
My particular favourite was
Even though McKee failed to make the first team grade at Burnley, his appetite was whetted at the start of last season when he was loaned out to St Mirren to get a brief taste of the big time
St Mirren (Big Time) > Burnley (Small Time)

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:34 am

Heh! Still, likesay, McKee says some reasonably things in there. Also interesting to note he's described as a "playmaker" who can "play across midfield", which gets the 4-2-3-1 idea ticking...

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7012
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Signings

Post by Mar » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:38 am

McKee's just probably been signed for squad depth. Can't see him lighting up our Championship campaign but hopefully be useful when we're carrying a few injuries.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:44 am

Mar wrote:McKee's just probably been signed for squad depth. Can't see him lighting up our Championship campaign but hopefully be useful when we're carrying a few injuries.
Not even that: he's a teenager, in with the ressies.
“I think at first it’s a case of getting my foot in the door,” he said. “I’ll be going with John Henry and the reserve boys so then it’s just up to me, like any of the younger boys."
I'm not thinking he'll play much of a part this season, just wondering if signing that type of player might be a welcome sign of tactical flexibility in the future. Might not be: maybe Coyle just sees him as a winger, or thinks he can play centrally in the holy 4-4-2...

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Re: Signings

Post by Puskas » Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:52 am

If McKee ever plays for us, I won't be going again.

Not that I will be anyway. Other than to boo him.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Re: Signings

Post by boltonboris » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:16 am

Isn't he a bit of a set-piece but nowt else kind of player? In which case you might be able to carry him in a 4-5-1 and ask him just to get tight on a creative oppo.

(in the future, obviously)
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: Signings

Post by Hoboh » Fri Jul 13, 2012 10:28 am

Lord Kangana wrote:I'm a c*nt in real life too, so I've nowt to lose.
Most Cooks are :mrgreen:

User avatar
Mar
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7012
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 12:23 pm
Location: Bolton

Re: Signings

Post by Mar » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:24 am

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Mar wrote:McKee's just probably been signed for squad depth. Can't see him lighting up our Championship campaign but hopefully be useful when we're carrying a few injuries.
Not even that: he's a teenager, in with the ressies.
“I think at first it’s a case of getting my foot in the door,” he said. “I’ll be going with John Henry and the reserve boys so then it’s just up to me, like any of the younger boys."
I'm not thinking he'll play much of a part this season, just wondering if signing that type of player might be a welcome sign of tactical flexibility in the future. Might not be: maybe Coyle just sees him as a winger, or thinks he can play centrally in the holy 4-4-2...

The way I saw it was he was a teenager at Burnley and he's had experience and seeing as Coyle's worked with him before he thought he would give him another try. Can't see why he'd end up going back into the youth setup. He must've seen enough to think someday he might break through otherwise whats the point.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Signings

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:28 am

Puskas wrote:If McKee ever plays for us, I won't be going again.

Not that I will be anyway. Other than to boo him.

Have I missed something? :conf:

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:51 am

Mar wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Mar wrote:McKee's just probably been signed for squad depth. Can't see him lighting up our Championship campaign but hopefully be useful when we're carrying a few injuries.
Not even that: he's a teenager, in with the ressies.
“I think at first it’s a case of getting my foot in the door,” he said. “I’ll be going with John Henry and the reserve boys so then it’s just up to me, like any of the younger boys."
I'm not thinking he'll play much of a part this season, just wondering if signing that type of player might be a welcome sign of tactical flexibility in the future. Might not be: maybe Coyle just sees him as a winger, or thinks he can play centrally in the holy 4-4-2...
The way I saw it was he was a teenager at Burnley and he's had experience and seeing as Coyle's worked with him before he thought he would give him another try. Can't see why he'd end up going back into the youth setup. He must've seen enough to think someday he might break through otherwise whats the point.
Indeed. But the way I see it, he's still a teenager and he's said he'll be starting in the reserves. Maybe he'll break through some day. I doubt that day is expected to be this season, although I wouldn't object if he's good enough.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31629
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Signings

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:53 am

Gary the Enfield wrote:
Puskas wrote:If McKee ever plays for us, I won't be going again. Not that I will be anyway. Other than to boo him.
Have I missed something? :conf:
Our Hungarian cat has amusingly decided to take against McKee vehemently, upping the ante after the kid's signing prompted some Coyle Mafia Burnley Reject WTF Is Going On-type posts.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: Signings

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:09 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
Puskas wrote:If McKee ever plays for us, I won't be going again. Not that I will be anyway. Other than to boo him.
Have I missed something? :conf:
Our Hungarian cat has amusingly decided to take against McKee vehemently, upping the ante after the kid's signing prompted some Coyle Mafia Burnley Reject WTF Is Going On-type posts.

Aah, right. Carry on. :roll:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DJBlu, Google [Bot] and 39 guests