Zat Knight
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Zat Knight
I think thats my point
He needs to use his attributes and be a stopper
So don't stand off, get all over the bastards
He needs to use his attributes and be a stopper
So don't stand off, get all over the bastards
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: Zat Knight
I have many a good word to say about our players.. Zat Knight being one of the exceptionsn035209 wrote:boltonboris wrote:If Coyle thinks he's better than Wheater, it still doesn't mean he's anything other than shite.. Just not AS shite.CAPSLOCK wrote:Knight was playing against world class players
He's bound to look dodgy as he's nothing more than adequate
How anybody can say he played well, fcuk knows
His biggest weakness is that he gives players too much space
Stand off the likes of Aguerro by 5 yards and it'll bite you in the arse
Still, Coyle keeps picking him, despite spending 2 million on Wheater, so what do I know
Doesn't really bode well does it!
I dont mean to rock the boat but do you actually have a good word to say about anyone who plays for us? (Bolton boris)
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Zat Knight
Equally, it's seldom a great idea to get too tight on someone with a centre of gravity a foot lower than thine. Which is not to defend Knight, who IMO isn't as good as Wheater and is a league behind Cahill. I don't dislike the big fella, and obviously nor does Coyle – I thought he'd been brought back in at Wembley just to combat Stoke's height, but he's still there four months later – but I do agree that he's nowhere near as imposing as he should be for his size.CAPSLOCK wrote:Stand off the likes of Aguerro by 5 yards and it'll bite you in the arse
-
- Promising
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:00 am
Re: Zat Knight
knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability


Re: Zat Knight
I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Zat Knight
Most compelling argument so far.ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Re: Zat Knight
Wandering Willy wrote:Most compelling argument so far.ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability

- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Zat Knight
ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
fvck me
Gerald Cid shows Zat up when It comes to playing football
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Zat Knight
That is too, too cruel... and it's not even close... Zat is Bobby Moore compared to El Cid...plymouth wanderer wrote:ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
fvck me
Gerald Cid shows Zat up when It comes to playing football
- plymouth wanderer
- Icon
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:20 pm
- Location: Er Plymouth
Re: Zat Knight
William the White wrote:That is too, too cruel... and it's not even close... Zat is Bobby Moore compared to El Cid...plymouth wanderer wrote:ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
fvck me
Gerald Cid shows Zat up when It comes to playing football
now who's taking the piss
Never get into an argument with an idiot. i'll bring you down to my level and beat you with experience
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Re: Zat Knight
As though...plymouth wanderer wrote:William the White wrote:That is too, too cruel... and it's not even close... Zat is Bobby Moore compared to El Cid...plymouth wanderer wrote:ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
fvck me
Gerald Cid shows Zat up when It comes to playing football
now who's taking the piss
Re: Zat Knight
plymouth wanderer wrote:William the White wrote:That is too, too cruel... and it's not even close... Zat is Bobby Moore compared to El Cid...plymouth wanderer wrote:ChrisC wrote:I'm 6'3 and I still think he is shite. Wheater isnt a short arse and shows Zat up when It comes to playing football in general.mrpiccollo wrote:knight is quality this is why hes allways in our starting 11 you moaners are just used to seeing shorter centre halves and are most likely shortasses in comparison therefore cant give fair comparisons to someone of his size and ability
fvck me
Gerald Cid shows Zat up when It comes to playing football
now who's taking the piss

please leave the boards.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: Zat Knight
Sounds like a disqualified ballroom dancer.Verbal wrote: please leave the boards.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Abdoulaye's Twin, DJBlu, Google [Bot], The_Gun and 36 guests