Freedman out!
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: Freedman out!
"The Bolton boss said: "I spoke to him a couple of weeks ago and congratulated him on the job. I told him I'll see him in a couple of weeks and is there any chance of one or two of his players? He said, 'I'll see you next week, but no!'."
Fills you with hope, hey.
Fills you with hope, hey.
Re: Freedman out!
Been asleep a couple of hours, he still here?
-
- Icon
- Posts: 4141
- Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:28 pm
Re: Freedman out!
He's the saviour don't you know.
He got rid of n'Gog.
He got rid of n'Gog.
They're dirty, they're filthy, they're never gonna last.
Poor man last, rich man first.
Poor man last, rich man first.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:13 pm
- Location: Fleetwood
Re: Freedman out!
: Stan Collymore sounds like he knows
what he's talking about! Bet he'd be
ace

ace

- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Freedman out!
And Kevin Davies.Wandering Willy wrote:He's the saviour don't you know.
He got rid of n'Gog.

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Freedman out!
He did? Well why didn't he tell the rest of the squad?Worthy4England wrote:And Kevin Davies.Wandering Willy wrote:He's the saviour don't you know.
He got rid of n'Gog.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: Freedman out!
I was giving this some thought last evening. Would you want Zat Knight playing on the deck, through the midfield? Personally, I'd rather know it was likely to come back at us from 10-20 yards inside their half, than 5 yards from our box.Bruce Rioja wrote:He did? Well why didn't he tell the rest of the squad?Worthy4England wrote:And Kevin Davies.Wandering Willy wrote:He's the saviour don't you know.
He got rid of n'Gog.

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: Freedman out!
Ah, but hang on, we've even seen Zatastrophe chucked up into the SKD role under this prick?!Worthy4England wrote:I was giving this some thought last evening. Would you want Zat Knight playing on the deck, through the midfield? Personally, I'd rather know it was likely to come back at us from 10-20 yards inside their half, than 5 yards from our box.Bruce Rioja wrote:He did? Well why didn't he tell the rest of the squad?Worthy4England wrote:And Kevin Davies.Wandering Willy wrote:He's the saviour don't you know.
He got rid of n'Gog.

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: Freedman out!
Yeah, but its a step up from throwing an extra striker upfront isn't it?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: Freedman out!
Is he still here?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31629
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: Freedman out!
The quick answer is I wouldn't want Zat Knight playing at all.Worthy4England wrote:Would you want Zat Knight playing on the deck, through the midfield? Personally, I'd rather know it was likely to come back at us from 10-20 yards inside their half, than 5 yards from our box.
The slightly longer answer is that midfielders should be asking for the ball in positions they can comfortably get them. If Zat can't play a five-yard ball forward (or even sideways, if the midfielder drops) then he shouldn't be playing in our first team. The chances of completing a long ball forward are almost always much much lower than completing a short ball. I'm not of the school that says defenders should only defend - full-backs in particular should be able to pass well and wisely - but no team's passing should be dictated by a centre-back, unless he's some sort of Beckenbauer - in which case he'd be more likely to move into midfield, not unlike our dear friends Ivan Campo. and Fernando Hierro.
Re: Freedman out!
'Fraid we ain't got a Paul Scholes type in our Mid setup, so thats a non-starter.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:The quick answer is I wouldn't want Zat Knight playing at all.Worthy4England wrote:Would you want Zat Knight playing on the deck, through the midfield? Personally, I'd rather know it was likely to come back at us from 10-20 yards inside their half, than 5 yards from our box.
The slightly longer answer is that midfielders should be asking for the ball in positions they can comfortably get them. If Zat can't play a five-yard ball forward (or even sideways, if the midfielder drops) then he shouldn't be playing in our first team. The chances of completing a long ball forward are almost always much much lower than completing a short ball. I'm not of the school that says defenders should only defend - full-backs in particular should be able to pass well and wisely - but no team's passing should be dictated by a centre-back, unless he's some sort of Beckenbauer - in which case he'd be more likely to move into midfield, not unlike our dear friends Ivan Campo. and Fernando Hierro.
Re: Freedman out!
Yeah it's like when he says Jutkiewicz will do well if he gets the right service. He might as well admit he's going to be shite then, that was his excuse for Beckford. But then he says if we get a goalscorer or two we'll be at the top. Jesus wept.
...
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38820
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: Freedman out!
Just remind me how many goals Beckford has scored this season? Hardly a total disaster on that front.LeverEnd wrote:Yeah it's like when he says Jutkiewicz will do well if he gets the right service. He might as well admit he's going to be shite then, that was his excuse for Beckford. But then he says if we get a goalscorer or two we'll be at the top. Jesus wept.
Re: Freedman out!
No not a total disaster of course, played correctly by a decent positive manager he'd have a lot more is what I'm thinking.BWFC_Insane wrote:Just remind me how many goals Beckford has scored this season? Hardly a total disaster on that front.LeverEnd wrote:Yeah it's like when he says Jutkiewicz will do well if he gets the right service. He might as well admit he's going to be shite then, that was his excuse for Beckford. But then he says if we get a goalscorer or two we'll be at the top. Jesus wept.
...
Re: Freedman out!
He has 8 so far, 6 in the league.
I don't think he is that good.
I don't think he is that good.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Freedman out!
No but if he was we'd be top 6! We'd scrape a 7-7 at reading...
Re: Freedman out!
Getting sucked into the scrap at the bottom. Anybody think these players have the bottle for it? Anybody think this clown has the ability to steer them clear? We've had a few chances tonight. We missed them all and now this is just a routine home win for QPR, a pretty mediocre QPR at that. A poor to mediocre Ipswich will routinely beat us as well. Big big pressure on next home game Dougie...
Re: Freedman out!
Burnley isn't it? Should be a good game if we compete. They've had a great season so far. Might run out of steam though.
...
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: Freedman out!
I think we'll drop
Just another leeds, sheff wed, southampton etc etc
Just another leeds, sheff wed, southampton etc etc
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests