The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:33 pm

Prufrock wrote:Erm, no. It's not as simple as s.1(1) of the Tax Act, "pay some tax". They don't write a list of every single financial product on the market with a percentage next to it. You write a law, then a new product comes along. How do you figure out parliament's intention towards something that didn't exist when they wrote the law? If you could just wire that down there's a few folk would be very grateful.
I think bedwetter has kind of covered it in his response, but I believe it to be perfectly possible write into legislation "spirit of the law" clauses.

In tandem, and to aid the judiciary, I would have an ongoing cross-party committee (meeting say quarterly for a week to hear evidence, with a mandatory time-restricted debate in the house attached based on the evidence) to monitor any moves that are being made to circumvent current legislation (eg The Dutch Sandwich).

I don't however believe that there is political will to do anything of the sort. But its all perfectly possible if they wanted it.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34754
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:35 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Erm, no. It's not as simple as s.1(1) of the Tax Act, "pay some tax". They don't write a list of every single financial product on the market with a percentage next to it. You write a law, then a new product comes along. How do you figure out parliament's intention towards something that didn't exist when they wrote the law? If you could just wire that down there's a few folk would be very grateful.
I think bedwetter has kind of covered it in his response, but I believe it to be perfectly possible write into legislation "spirit of the law" clauses.

In tandem, and to aid the judiciary, I would have an ongoing cross-party committee (meeting say quarterly for a week to hear evidence, with a mandatory time-restricted debate in the house attached based on the evidence) to monitor any moves that are being made to circumvent current legislation (eg The Dutch Sandwich).

I don't however believe that there is political will to do anything of the sort. But its all perfectly possible if they wanted it.
They'd be more likely discussing how the fcuk to get round "spirit of the law" clauses without breaking the "spirit of the law"...

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:43 pm

Like I say, I find it a pity that we have a Parliament so stuffed to the gunnels with Liliputians that no-one sees this time of opportunity for what it is.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:03 pm

Lord Kangana wrote:
Prufrock wrote:Erm, no. It's not as simple as s.1(1) of the Tax Act, "pay some tax". They don't write a list of every single financial product on the market with a percentage next to it. You write a law, then a new product comes along. How do you figure out parliament's intention towards something that didn't exist when they wrote the law? If you could just wire that down there's a few folk would be very grateful.
I think bedwetter has kind of covered it in his response, but I believe it to be perfectly possible write into legislation "spirit of the law" clauses.

In tandem, and to aid the judiciary, I would have an ongoing cross-party committee (meeting say quarterly for a week to hear evidence, with a mandatory time-restricted debate in the house attached based on the evidence) to monitor any moves that are being made to circumvent current legislation (eg The Dutch Sandwich).

you kinky beast!

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:04 pm

With a Double Irish!

F - Narrrr.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9405
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Harry Genshaw » Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:39 pm

Surely this John Whittingdale character (never heard of him before btw) can't remain in post/on the Leveson enquiry?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Thu Apr 14, 2016 5:46 pm

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/news/sho ... ocid=edgsp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

feasible?

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:06 pm

A read

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/a ... ge-monbiot" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Sat Apr 16, 2016 12:27 am

Image


Strange how one can sometimes find ones self leaning towards the left

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34754
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:04 pm

So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Sun Apr 17, 2016 6:21 pm

Worthy4England wrote:So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?

there's no chance at all cameron would survive an OUT vote... but then he double-pinky-promised that he'd serve a full term (to stop us being scared of the "vote cameron get osborne" possibility - so he'll be in a bind...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34754
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Apr 17, 2016 8:51 pm

thebish wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?

there's no chance at all cameron would survive an OUT vote... but then he double-pinky-promised that he'd serve a full term (to stop us being scared of the "vote cameron get osborne" possibility - so he'll be in a bind...
I know you could determine that there was going to be a Minister for Exit or suchlike, but I don't see how any "Remainers" could lead any Government on a course so fundamentally different than the one they were supporting, touching so many policy areas - that would apply to any government. Surely you'd have to have someone in charge who was fully committed to getting all the outcomes that have and no doubt will be promised between now and referendum time.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13661
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Hoboh » Sun Apr 17, 2016 8:52 pm

Worthy4England wrote:So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?
Reckon he's gone either way tbh

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34754
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Apr 17, 2016 8:56 pm

Hoboh wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?
Reckon he's gone either way tbh
Not sure about that - were the referendum in favour of remaining, what mandate would the outers on his back benches have to remove him?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24835
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Prufrock » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:07 pm

That it's a condition of joining the Tories to work to cock up any seemingly unassailable electoral position.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34754
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Worthy4England » Sun Apr 17, 2016 9:26 pm

Prufrock wrote:That it's a condition of joining the Tories to work to cock up any seemingly unassailable electoral position.
Well. There's been more than one party over the years, that's been pretty good at that... :-)

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Sun Apr 17, 2016 10:37 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
thebish wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:So a couple of Tory cabinet ministers think Cameron should stay if the referendum vote is for "out"...Surely, that wouldn't logistically work. Apart from anything else, I'd have thought one of the Conservative "out" campaigners would need to lead, to ensure they were accountable for the claims they make, pre referendum? Put their proverbial cock on the block?

there's no chance at all cameron would survive an OUT vote... but then he double-pinky-promised that he'd serve a full term (to stop us being scared of the "vote cameron get osborne" possibility - so he'll be in a bind...
I know you could determine that there was going to be a Minister for Exit or suchlike, but I don't see how any "Remainers" could lead any Government on a course so fundamentally different than the one they were supporting, touching so many policy areas - that would apply to any government. Surely you'd have to have someone in charge who was fully committed to getting all the outcomes that have and no doubt will be promised between now and referendum time.
yes - I agree - there's no way cameron will survive an OUT vote!

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by thebish » Tue Apr 19, 2016 2:07 pm

Has this new government actually got any of its proposals through yet??

their flagship Housing Bill is currently being irreparably shredded in the Lords... Backbenchers are rebelling against the forced-conversion of all schools into academies... welfare reform was shot down in flames....
the budget tax changes?? well - that was embarassing...

limping along with no workable ideas and still four years to run... :?

Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4054
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by Bijou Bob » Tue Apr 19, 2016 9:02 pm

......still, I suspect it's better than it would be in Jezza's socialist utopia.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Re: The Politics Thread

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Apr 22, 2016 7:48 am

So ... last night the "Leader of the Free Wirkd" flew into the 51st State to tell us what to do.

The worst President since Niton ... & there are arguments to say he's been worse than him ... the one who decided the US was bored with the middle east, ABD picked a fight with Israel to boot .... good outcome there Barak, AND with Europe, so Russia tested our edges. But he'd focus on Asia ... with f'call outcome.

Insults the UK .... & has his minions scurrying around to "unsay" what he said. Made zero progress on his gun control campaigns and not closed Guatanamo despite 8 years trying.

Now tells the UK what to do about Europe & says we are better fighting terrorism whilst in it. How would he know.

At least he improved his golf handicap whilst in office.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests