General Chit Chat

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bijou Bob » Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:41 pm

Ally? If that's the punchline.........
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:42 pm

Beefheart wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Q is queer. It's been reclaimed. A could be Asexual or Ally.

Here is the full list, all completely valid. Of course. LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual)
I didn't have Asexual or Ally, for A. :-)

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:34 pm

Worthy4England wrote:Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Really? I can't even reach L :oops:

A is for Arsebandit, by the way.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Bijou Bob
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4051
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:35 pm
Location: Swashbucklin in Brooklyn

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bijou Bob » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:39 pm

Careful Gunga Din.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:00 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
Beefheart wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:Just to add to some letters apparently we have an LBGTQA network at work....I can get as far as T without making non-politically correct stuff up about the last 2...
Q is queer. It's been reclaimed. A could be Asexual or Ally.

Here is the full list, all completely valid. Of course. LGBTTQQIAAP (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, transsexual, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, ally, pansexual)
I didn't have Asexual or Ally, for A. :-)
Are you aromatic?
A: You may have also seen LGB, GLBT, GLT, BLGTA, LGBTT2QQIIAAP, etc. We are called the LGBTQA Resource Center, which stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Asexual/Aromantic, Allies and Advocates (and the A can also stand for All).
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Harry Genshaw » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:02 pm

^ If the A stands for 'All' we can do away with all the LGBT bit can't we?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:08 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:^ If the A stands for 'All' we can do away with all the LGBT bit can't we?
Maybe it stands for Alabama Hot Pocket.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Montreal Wanderer
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 12948
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Montreal Wanderer » Fri Oct 21, 2016 3:08 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:^ If the A stands for 'All' we can do away with all the LGBT bit can't we?
Fundamentalist religions appear to think so. Oh, wait - you were talking about language redundancy.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Prufrock » Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:21 pm

As I understand it, "queer" basically means "all" so yeah, I think there is some repetition.

What I've never understood is why being gay and being trans are somehow the same "club". You sexuality is as different from your gender as it is from, say, your race, or whether you are disabled. So what started as a gay rights movement now includes trans and similar, but not race and similar. Why does it matter? Well it probably doesn't, but there is no reason you couldn't be gay and think the trans thing is a load of rubbish (or vice-versa).
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by LeverEnd » Fri Oct 21, 2016 6:11 pm

Bestiality?
...

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Gary the Enfield » Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:39 am

LeverEnd wrote:Bestiality?

Are you asking retrospectively? :mrgreen:

I used to be into flagellation, necrophilia and bestiality. Until I realised I was flogging a dead horse.......

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:10 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
LeverEnd wrote:Bestiality?

Are you asking retrospectively? :mrgreen:

I used to be into flagellation, necrophilia and bestiality. Until I realised I was flogging a dead horse.......
Iwas just into necrophilia, but realsiedit was dead boring.
...

Dr Hotdog
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:50 pm
Location: no

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Dr Hotdog » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:35 am

That fecking Iranian kid we've got Samizaheshdeeh looks about 24 n all. Lads got a full beard at 17. Send the feck* back to fight where he belongs.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Hoboh » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:43 am

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... al-gatwick" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sorry but NO!

You cannot just demolish a village for a strip of tarmac.

Where's me wellies.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Prufrock » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:45 am

I couldn't get less of a shite about the sodding airport. I just hope they get on with whatever they're getting on with as quickly and as quietly as possible so folk can stop going on about it.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:59 am

Last year Boris Johnson said he would lie down "in front of the bulldozers" if Heathrow built a new runway
I'm looking for Application Forms to be a bulldozer driver. Anyone have any?

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:36 pm

Prufrock wrote:I couldn't get less of a shite about the sodding airport. I just hope they get on with whatever they're getting on with as quickly and as quietly as possible so folk can stop going on about it.
The additional planes aren't temporary. I look forward to you moaning about the racket that they make. This is nothing other than a fecking outrage. Those of us that travel under a regular basis avoid Heathrow like the fecking plague. When I fly to our plant in Augusta I connect at either Schiphol or CDG (yes, east to go west) because at least I know that they'll process me in time to make my connection. Heathrow's problems are all down to their inability to process people and their belongings in a timely manner and until they address that then having an additional runway will simply exacerbate that problem. This idea that it needs a third runway, and the local devastation to the lives of people, wildlife and the local environment, to make it more of a global entity is complete and utter bollocks. Schiphol has six runways yet only processes 75% of the amount of passengers that Heathrow does. Look where other capital cities airports are in relation to the city - nowhere fecking near and as such having little if any impact on the lives of the city's inhabitants. I'll continue to avoid Heathrow regardless as to how many runways they have, perhaps even more so now.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:56 pm

Heathrow might not need extra capacity if the likes of BA actually flew to a few more places from regional airports rather than funnelling everyone through Heathrow. Emirates flights to 6 airports in England and Scotland. BA to Heathrow and possibly Gatwick. I understand the need for a hub, but if there is enough business for Emirates then I'm sure BA could fly from somewhere up north.

That said, BA is the worst airline I've ever flown business class on,so I wouldn't choose to fly them if it could be helped.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Harry Genshaw » Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:54 pm

Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Heathrow might not need extra capacity if the likes of BA actually flew to a few more places from regional airports rather than funnelling everyone through Heathrow. Emirates flights to 6 airports in England and Scotland. BA to Heathrow and possibly Gatwick. I understand the need for a hub, but if there is enough business for Emirates then I'm sure BA could fly from somewhere up north.

That said, BA is the worst airline I've ever flown business class on,so I wouldn't choose to fly them if it could be helped.
Do BA not fly from Manchester any more? I've flown with them from there in the past :conf:
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: General Chit Chat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:05 pm

Harry Genshaw wrote:
Abdoulaye's Twin wrote:Heathrow might not need extra capacity if the likes of BA actually flew to a few more places from regional airports rather than funnelling everyone through Heathrow. Emirates flights to 6 airports in England and Scotland. BA to Heathrow and possibly Gatwick. I understand the need for a hub, but if there is enough business for Emirates then I'm sure BA could fly from somewhere up north.

That said, BA is the worst airline I've ever flown business class on,so I wouldn't choose to fly them if it could be helped.
Do BA not fly from Manchester any more? I've flown with them from there in the past :conf:
They do, yet they fail to recognize price led competition. £700 to Billund? That's a very expensive sandwich.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests