Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat 17th

Where fellow sufferers gather to share the pain, longing and unrequited transfer requests that make being a Wanderer what it is...

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

User avatar
TonyDomingos
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3103
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:27 pm
Location: Sarf East London

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by TonyDomingos » Sat Dec 17, 2016 6:42 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
jetsetwilly wrote:When Spearing and Clough have an off day we offer nothing. Desperate need of a striker. We were awful today. Not sure I'll ever see us win away again
Fcuking hell. Poor result of the back of an amazing run. Shit happens.
LeverflippinEnd happens! :D
Às armas, às armas!
Sobre a terra, sobre o mar,
Às armas, às armas!
Pela Pátria lutar!
Contra os canhões marchar, marchar!

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Dec 17, 2016 7:09 pm

Are you equating me to shit?
Fair enough.
...

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by LeverEnd » Sat Dec 17, 2016 7:35 pm

officer_dibble wrote:We dont really have anyone on the bench likely to get a goal which hurts us.Proctor and Anderson awaste of space. Taylors not been great. Pratley coming back might be useful just for that.
That is the problem. Proctor is a good sub when we are holding on to something. If we go behind we struggle though. Goal was against the run of play but after it we wilted. We can't seem to chase a game. Fortunately we don't go behind often I suppose.
10 consecutive away defeats now. You buggers should be showingeing me sympathy not giving me grief!
...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sat Dec 17, 2016 8:04 pm

Well, I made it, and wish i hadn't. fecking shit. I can't understand how a side that played like world-beaters on Monday can play like they've never met one and other five days later. Rarely stringing two passes together, nosebleeds in front of goal and absolutely no answer to how quickly we were closed down in possession by Chesterfield. Many questions were asked of everyone this afternoon and we had no answers. Credit only to Ben Alnwick who was a man amongst boys. And to Harry Genshaw for the conveyance. :)
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Harry Genshaw » Sat Dec 17, 2016 9:03 pm

I'm not too down hearted. We didn't play well but still created enough to get something out of the game. Despite Mondays goal fest they're still a problem and when Zach misfires I don't know where they're coming from. I only hope that today was the day all the big boys sent their scouts to watch him
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38824
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by BWFC_Insane » Sat Dec 17, 2016 10:36 pm

Let's face it in this run we've often not played well but taken our chances and not conceded. Today opposite happened. Smashing Gillingham is if we are honest a bit of an outlier generally.

Armchair Wanderer
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1967
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:36 am

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Armchair Wanderer » Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:39 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:Credit only to Ben Alnwick who was a man amongst boys.
I thought the tallest dwarf was fullback Taylor.
The players you fail to sign never lose you any money.

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by General Mannerheim » Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:42 am

when did they sign Razor Ruddock at centre half!?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38824
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 19, 2016 11:22 am

throwawayboltonian wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Let's face it in this run we've often not played well but taken our chances and not conceded. Today opposite happened. Smashing Gillingham is if we are honest a bit of an outlier generally.
Changed your tone a bit insano. The gist I've been getting from the recent match threads is that this is the outlier. All other matches we've created quite a few chances and defended comfortably. This sounded like poor all round performances, of the likes of the Oxford match. Mind I've not been to a game since Swindon away, although I'm hoping to make the Boxing day match if I'm not too hungover.
Nah look at other games beyond Gillingham, Coventry 2nd half say, or Northampton.

We've scored and kept teams out at times. Not often been brilliant. Point is vs Chesterfield had Zach scored we'd probably have won. They scored and did enough.

Not criticising, just saying that can happen when fine margins go the other way.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31636
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Dec 19, 2016 12:54 pm

Grumbly pissed bloke who materialised alongside my aisle seat spent the last 10 minutes complaining. One of his more coherent thought processes, which is a low bar but there you go, went something along the lines of "this is shit... like at Walsall, and Peterborough, and..." then he shut up.

Probably too hammered to even see the pitch at Rochdale.

It is what it is, and it was what it was. Sometimes you have to give credit to the opposition, and on Saturday Chesterfield – having scored a decent goal which can't easily be blamed on any defender or defenders - were quickest to every knockdown and stray pass, and decent at stretching us once they had the ball themselves. It was the sort of thing we'e been doing very well all season, and they did it to us. Such is life sometimes.

I don't think we played terribly, just that too many of our players had slight off-days. Not awful, nothing-went-right, lazy-arse, can't-kick-straight horror shows, just slightly fluffed passes and lack of confidence. In the warm-up Zach was popping shots into all corners, but I said to Flanners that when he's in one-on-ones I still don't feel confident - arguably less so than Josh these days. That's not to say We Should Sell Clough, just that you don't get that feeling of certainty. It's hard to define, but it's there. True enough (and to my sadness rather than told-you-so superiority), he fluffed our best chance and was among many to waft second-half chances high into the away end.

Flanners notes correctly that our games these days are frequently first-goal-wins. (Not massively unusual. Apparently yesterday was the first time in more than four years that Man City had won a home game after being behind at half-time.) That has been the case in our last 18 games, 12 of them wins, 6 losses. That's partly due to our very welcome defensive solidity, slightly due to a lack of ideas up front if Zach/Sammy aren't firing, partly due to respectful opponents sitting back and defending for their lives against title candidates.

So, 10 hours and close on £100 wasted, but I wasn't screaming in anger at the players, or bemoaning my loss. It's a pity, especially as the atmosphere before the goal was crackling with a large and very vocal away support. We won't go far wrong.

EDIT Error: Of our last 18 games, we're W12 L6 not W12 D6. Last draw was against Bradford... 0-0.
Last edited by Dave Sutton's barnet on Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38824
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:01 pm

Get what DSB says about Clough. His one on one finishing against a keeper could use some work. He used to be fabulous at it, but he seems to always hit the keeper now. In some ways might be good as might be a factor that prevents someone taking him from us in January. Though come 1st Feb I'd like him to be knocking them in for fun. Bottom line is if we want to go up, our front 4 have to score more.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31636
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:39 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:if we want to go up, our front 4 have to score more.
Not sure they do - they'd got 7 in the previous two games. But we do need to work out how to come from behind, on the thankfully rare occasions we slip. This wasn't as bad as Walsall, where even before half-time the midfield frequently abdicated creative responsibility to Beevers and Wheater to bang gormless balls into the box, but we still lacked a little creative thrust - not notably once we abandoned the 4-2-3-1 and sent Zach up top it got even worse. (That's not necessarily a dig at the wee man, we just missed his potential for running at defenders - nor is it to criticise his left-side replacement Chris Taylor.)

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by LeverEnd » Mon Dec 19, 2016 2:31 pm

I don't get Chris Taylor. Why not bring Henry on? Parky s sub decisions really annoyed me.
...

User avatar
Abdoulaye's Twin
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9718
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Skye high

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Abdoulaye's Twin » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:13 pm

LeverEnd wrote:I don't get Chris Taylor. Why not bring Henry on? Parky s sub decisions really annoyed me.
Stop trying to pass the blame, we all know it's your fault for attending :whack:

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31636
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Dec 19, 2016 3:19 pm

I would dearly love Chris Taylor to score. He was close on a couple of occasions on Monday and didn't do a lot wrong (IMO) Saturday. He's not Zach Clough, but that's not unusual for this division.

Henry I'd also like to do well, but I'm less convinced he genuinely wants it. Slightly surprised to hear Ken say that they wanted to extend "both" the loans-to-January - Sammy is obviously a shoo-in, but Henry hasn't exactly scorched the earth and considering we're short on squad space I'm not convinced there isn't better out there.

On the subject of terrace favourites, I noted before Chesterfield scored that on three or four occasions people tried to get "Gary Madine, Goal Machine" going, but there was still a mixed reaction. I'm sure it would all have been different - songs, result, rumination – had his fierce first-half snap-shot from the edge of the box gone either side of a thankful goalkeeper.

User avatar
officer_dibble
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15295
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by officer_dibble » Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:54 pm

Yeah I imagine Henry is a decent wage for this decision. Hasn't looked that great and won't shift Ameobi. I'd be binning him off in Jan and looking for a goalscorer on loan. Someone of the bench that could change the focal point of the attack if plan A isn't working. Bit like Ricketts when we got promoted from the first division. Someone experienced rather than a kid. Be nice if we could send anderson back and loan woolery as well...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38824
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:22 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:if we want to go up, our front 4 have to score more.
Not sure they do - they'd got 7 in the previous two games. But we do need to work out how to come from behind, on the thankfully rare occasions we slip. This wasn't as bad as Walsall, where even before half-time the midfield frequently abdicated creative responsibility to Beevers and Wheater to bang gormless balls into the box, but we still lacked a little creative thrust - not notably once we abandoned the 4-2-3-1 and sent Zach up top it got even worse. (That's not necessarily a dig at the wee man, we just missed his potential for running at defenders - nor is it to criticise his left-side replacement Chris Taylor.)
I think that we always seem like every couple of months there is a game in us where we will miss a fair few chances and lose. It is why I think we might struggle for the top two.

Seems to be a little pattern....I just think perhaps we lack one goalscorer off the bench. Just to change it if one of the front four is misfiring like Zach on Saturday.

Peter Thompson
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:54 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Peter Thompson » Mon Dec 19, 2016 8:36 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:if we want to go up, our front 4 have to score more.
Not sure they do - they'd got 7 in the previous two games. But we do need to work out how to come from behind, on the thankfully rare occasions we slip. This wasn't as bad as Walsall, where even before half-time the midfield frequently abdicated creative responsibility to Beevers and Wheater to bang gormless balls into the box, but we still lacked a little creative thrust - not notably once we abandoned the 4-2-3-1 and sent Zach up top it got even worse. (That's not necessarily a dig at the wee man, we just missed his potential for running at defenders - nor is it to criticise his left-side replacement Chris Taylor.)
I think that we always seem like every couple of months there is a game in us where we will miss a fair few chances and lose. It is why I think we might struggle for the top two.

Seems to be a little pattern....I just think perhaps we lack one goalscorer off the bench. Just to change it if one of the front four is misfiring like Zach on Saturday.
Totally agree with this post....Chris Taylor is certainly not the answer when we need a goal, nor is Anderson or Proctor.

LeverEnd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9969
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 11:18 pm
Location: Dirty Leeds

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by LeverEnd » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:10 am

I think we're stuck with Anderson for the season. Henry looks like he's got something but not entirely committed like DSB says. Taylor looks like a pub player and no matter how committed he is I can't see him ever making a difference. Happy to be proved wrong of course.
...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34734
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: Ched Evans - Do women want their ..Chesterfield (a) Sat

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:20 am

The best transfer we could make in January, is LeverEnd out, to Wiggin or something.

Oh Domingo's isn't much better for London games either! ;-)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 32 guests