The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: The Politics Thread
Caroline Lucas was quite specific on r5 that we ,(the UK ) work longer hours than most of our western counterparts . This 4 day week proposal wasn't about doing the same hours in less time
Just less hours.
I could vote for that!
Just less hours.
I could vote for that!
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Reckon your pay would be pro-rated?Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2017 10:41 pmCaroline Lucas was quite specific on r5 that we ,(the UK ) work longer hours than most of our western counterparts . This 4 day week proposal wasn't about doing the same hours in less time
Just less hours.
I could vote for that!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Anyhow, I'm in the process of setting up Frankie International Ltd in the Cayman Islands...Then all I gotta do is sell it my house.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Productivity is based on outputs not inputs.
Why would we all need to work more hours on a four day week? It's archaic thinking like that that's holding us back.
Why would we all need to work more hours on a four day week? It's archaic thinking like that that's holding us back.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9714
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: The Politics Thread
I believe Billy might be looking for an upgradeWorthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2017 10:48 pmAnyhow, I'm in the process of setting up Frankie International Ltd in the Cayman Islands...Then all I gotta do is sell it my house.

- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38810
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Yes, but many industries there isn't the luxury of a 4 day week and then shutting down for 3 days. So your inputs would be spread more thinly.Lord Kangana wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2017 11:10 pmProductivity is based on outputs not inputs.
Why would we all need to work more hours on a four day week? It's archaic thinking like that that's holding us back.
Reality is that outputs cannot be sustained if you are operating for shorter times. And if the argument is that personal productivity would go up, I'd agree. But that would not compensate in many cases for loss of time.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
Plenty of us who aren't looking to do as little as is possible are signed off of the working time directive.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2017 10:41 pmCaroline Lucas was quite specific on r5 that we ,(the UK ) work longer hours than most of our western counterparts . This 4 day week proposal wasn't about doing the same hours in less time
Just less hours.
I could vote for that!

BWFC-I. The company I work for has two UK factories each running a three shift system for 24 hours a day. Efficiency is a real issue as the night shift is the least productive, despite the same lines running at the same speeds. This is where circadian rhythm was first highlighted as an issue.
It costs us more to run the night shifts due to higher wages plus the additional costs of having the lights and heating on all night yet they don't churn out as much finished product.
Get this though, and some miserable actuary has actually worked this out. The guys on the night shifts actually have a shorter life expectancy that their day shift colleagues. It costs us more to insure them as they're more prone to injury and statistically there are more people that have heart attacks at 4 in the morning than at any other time, and their death in service payments to their families are less, too.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2017 10:33 amPlenty of us who aren't looking to do as little as is possible are signed off of the working time directive.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2017 10:41 pmCaroline Lucas was quite specific on r5 that we ,(the UK ) work longer hours than most of our western counterparts . This 4 day week proposal wasn't about doing the same hours in less time
Just less hours.
I could vote for that!
BWFC-I. The company I work for has two UK factories each running a three shift system for 24 hours a day. Efficiency is a real issue as the night shift is the least productive, despite the same lines running at the same speeds. This is where circadian rhythm was first highlighted as an issue.
It costs us more to run the night shifts due to higher wages plus the additional costs of having the lights and heating on all night yet they don't churn out as much finished product.
Get this though, and some miserable actuary has actually worked this out. The guys on the night shifts actually have a shorter life expectancy that their day shift colleagues. It costs us more to insure them as they're more prone to injury and statistically there are more people that have heart attacks at 4 in the morning than at any other time, and their death in service payments to their families are less, too.
Just cut the night shift and have a 9 day week, then
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
Re: The Politics Thread
Whatever your politics gentlemen, could you please just take a minute to #prayfordianeshair. It could be the difference between life and death.
Uma mesa para um, faz favor. Obrigado.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
Well, neither me nor thee will be sporting an Afro anytime soon, Kid.

May the bridges I burn light your way
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Worthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 10:57 pmI didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
I thought Corbyn did a better job than May..
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I didn't see the audience q and a, so missed most of it all. But the Paxman bit, she was about as clued up as Diane Abbot.tankcopters n aids wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:11 amWorthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 10:57 pmI didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
I thought Corbyn did a better job than May..
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38810
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
The lack of substance is stunning. You'd have thought she could at least pretend. If Labour had a Blair type character in charge they'd absolutely wipe the floor with her.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:25 amI didn't see the audience q and a, so missed most of it all. But the Paxman bit, she was about as clued up as Diane Abbot.tankcopters n aids wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:11 amWorthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 10:57 pmI didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
I thought Corbyn did a better job than May..
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
Have heard Corbyn's interview this morning. I guess as he was doing the mumsy rounds to announce his free childcare places he clearly wasn't expecting a little fiscal scrutiny. At least he didn't do an Abbott and start plucking random figures from the ether.
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
A genocidal liar?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 9:37 amThe lack of substance is stunning. You'd have thought she could at least pretend. If Labour had a Blair type character in charge they'd absolutely wipe the floor with her.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:25 amI didn't see the audience q and a, so missed most of it all. But the Paxman bit, she was about as clued up as Diane Abbot.tankcopters n aids wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:11 amWorthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 10:57 pmI didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
I thought Corbyn did a better job than May..
May the bridges I burn light your way
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38810
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
I knew someone would say that, I had a bet with myself it would be Hoboh.Bruce Rioja wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 5:30 pmA genocidal liar?BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 9:37 amThe lack of substance is stunning. You'd have thought she could at least pretend. If Labour had a Blair type character in charge they'd absolutely wipe the floor with her.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:25 amI didn't see the audience q and a, so missed most of it all. But the Paxman bit, she was about as clued up as Diane Abbot.tankcopters n aids wrote: ↑Tue May 30, 2017 6:11 amWorthy4England wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 10:57 pmI didn't catch Corbyn on Channel 4 with Paxman. But May wasn't very convincing... How bad did Corbyn get savaged?
I thought Corbyn did a better job than May..
Obviously not. But someone with charisma who could charm the electorate. May would be absolutely dead in the water. Even Kinnock would win against her.
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Re: The Politics Thread
Again, you say 'even Kinnock', but Kinnock was the moderniser of the Modern Labour party. Let's be clear, without Kinnock there would have been no Blair.
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Re: The Politics Thread
Genocidal liar? That's a bit...playground.
Kinnock would absolutely wipe the floor with her. Any leader of either major party back to Foot, minus Howard and IDS would wipe the floor with her.
However while I'm no Corbyn apologist (the useless sod), really don't see the problem with his interview this morning. As BR says, he didn't start playing numberwang. It's not a spelling bee. I'm not sure why they suddenly have to have all the figures on the tip of their tongue. "Hang on, we've worked it out and I've got the figure here" seems perfectly fine to me.
Kinnock would absolutely wipe the floor with her. Any leader of either major party back to Foot, minus Howard and IDS would wipe the floor with her.
However while I'm no Corbyn apologist (the useless sod), really don't see the problem with his interview this morning. As BR says, he didn't start playing numberwang. It's not a spelling bee. I'm not sure why they suddenly have to have all the figures on the tip of their tongue. "Hang on, we've worked it out and I've got the figure here" seems perfectly fine to me.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Re: The Politics Thread
It was meant to be, but clearly I misjudged the sensitivity of current moods.
There's absolutely no point in dragging out hypothetical clap-trap regarding who'd have done well against who - to quote LP Hartley - "The past is a foreign country, they do things differently there".
I'm more interested in the current election and personally I'm no further forward in that I can't vote for either just now.
Going back to TV debates / interviews and so on, my personal thoughts as to why May refused to appear on a live TV debate are nothing to do with either perceived arrogance nor 'running scared'. I think it's simply because party advisors realised that the worst thing that could have possibly happened is that she'd have been ripped apart (ironic for a pro fox hunter) most certainly by Nicola Sturgeon. She's managed to run-down any scrap of leadership credibility she may have had single-handed, she's hardly needed a hand.
May the bridges I burn light your way
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests