The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
Did you know that the immediate cause of the 1967 war (the Third Arab-Israeli war) was the planned Syrian attempt to divert the waters of the river Jordan away from Israel and deprive Israel of water.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:54 pmHa! Well if I'd said adults you'd have said it was their own fault for voting for Hamas! Much like it was the victims of 7/7 own fault because they voted for Blair?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:21 pmIt's always the poor suffering children, never any suffering adults!Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:44 pmI'm not going to the argue the sides respective claim to the land with you or even the violence on both sides. Some of that's been going on for centuries but that last point is crap and you know it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:09 pmThe only ones suffering are those supporting and ruled by barbaric anti-semite factions such as Hamas.
For starters- the children living in villages without running water because it's been turned off by the illegal settlement next door? How's that the fault of Hamas and not the Israeli govt?
Anyway, I totally dispute any nasty illegal Jewish people have cut off any babies' tap water.![]()
You're right re the settlements and villages. I made them up. Just don't Google Alfei Menashe or Arab ar Ramadin. It was first exposed there by a bunch of anti semites from an Israeli human rights group. Not only did they turn their water off , they dumped their effluent on them too
If you read extremist claptrap you get forcefed bullshit.*
*by that I mean the following: By flagging 'The Suffering of The Palestinian People' which in essence you mean some Bedouin were doused in effluent and a bunch of ultra orthodox nutjobs may (or may not) have turned a water supply off temporarily, and then conflating that into 'The Suffering', well, everything becomes meaningless.
(PS the third Arab-Israeli war did, in part, start because Syria did really plan on diverting the River Jordan away from Israel.)
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38832
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
If you're fine with free speech then you can't have an issue with anyone in the education system either. Though I suspect it goes rather one way.Hoboh wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:06 pmViolence, no problem clamp down on it on any side, I kinda draw the line a little on the 'hate speech' thing because too many view Boo! as hate now a days.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:15 pmWe could start with you not making nonsense up. Though I suspect that's too much to ask.Hoboh wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:33 pmSo how's about we start with the brick chucking, riot at any event, black clad masked Ninja's from 'militant' that now have 'Momentum'?I think everyone needs to take responsibility. The whole discourse is distasteful. But we have a right wing dominated press that have behaved for decades in the most shameful and provocative way. That is the biggest scandal in this regard. If you can't admit that then you can't have a sensible discussion about this.
When the wheels come off those little shits or we get licenced to shoot the buggers on sight, chuck in the political pricks and soft arses ruining the education system breeding the I, me, self entitlements, then we maybe able to talk rationally.
I'm very happy to tackle the violent elements on any side of the political spectrum. How about we throw in the BNP its supporters, the EDL and the far right morons who commit acts of violence and incite hatred.
Deal with those on both sides equally. That is fine by me.
If it was rational like the use of the N word etc. No problem but far to many weep at anything now.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38832
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
For clarity is your position that the Israelis have never done nothing honest guv it's all them nasty Palestinian?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:08 pmDid you know that the immediate cause of the 1967 war (the Third Arab-Israeli war) was the planned Syrian attempt to divert the waters of the river Jordan away from Israel and deprive Israel of water.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:54 pmHa! Well if I'd said adults you'd have said it was their own fault for voting for Hamas! Much like it was the victims of 7/7 own fault because they voted for Blair?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:21 pmIt's always the poor suffering children, never any suffering adults!Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:44 pmI'm not going to the argue the sides respective claim to the land with you or even the violence on both sides. Some of that's been going on for centuries but that last point is crap and you know it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:09 pmThe only ones suffering are those supporting and ruled by barbaric anti-semite factions such as Hamas.
For starters- the children living in villages without running water because it's been turned off by the illegal settlement next door? How's that the fault of Hamas and not the Israeli govt?
Anyway, I totally dispute any nasty illegal Jewish people have cut off any babies' tap water.![]()
You're right re the settlements and villages. I made them up. Just don't Google Alfei Menashe or Arab ar Ramadin. It was first exposed there by a bunch of anti semites from an Israeli human rights group. Not only did they turn their water off , they dumped their effluent on them too
If you read extremist claptrap you get forcefed bullshit.*
*by that I mean the following: By flagging 'The Suffering of The Palestinian People' which in essence you mean some Bedouin were doused in effluent and a bunch of ultra orthodox nutjobs may (or may not) have turned a water supply off temporarily, and then conflating that into 'The Suffering', well, everything becomes meaningless.
(PS the third Arab-Israeli war did, in part, start because Syria did really plan on diverting the River Jordan away from Israel.)
Because all I seem to see is denials and obfuscation.
- Harry Genshaw
- Legend
- Posts: 9405
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
- Location: Half dead in Panama
Re: The Politics Thread
Well I suppose I could have referred to the random demolition of houses, the destruction of Olive trees, the restrictions on medical aid and supplies but I suspect you'd choose to pretend that's not happening either.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:08 pmDid you know that the immediate cause of the 1967 war (the Third Arab-Israeli war) was the planned Syrian attempt to divert the waters of the river Jordan away from Israel and deprive Israel of water.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:54 pmHa! Well if I'd said adults you'd have said it was their own fault for voting for Hamas! Much like it was the victims of 7/7 own fault because they voted for Blair?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:21 pmIt's always the poor suffering children, never any suffering adults!Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:44 pmI'm not going to the argue the sides respective claim to the land with you or even the violence on both sides. Some of that's been going on for centuries but that last point is crap and you know it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:09 pmThe only ones suffering are those supporting and ruled by barbaric anti-semite factions such as Hamas.
For starters- the children living in villages without running water because it's been turned off by the illegal settlement next door? How's that the fault of Hamas and not the Israeli govt?
Anyway, I totally dispute any nasty illegal Jewish people have cut off any babies' tap water.![]()
You're right re the settlements and villages. I made them up. Just don't Google Alfei Menashe or Arab ar Ramadin. It was first exposed there by a bunch of anti semites from an Israeli human rights group. Not only did they turn their water off , they dumped their effluent on them too
If you read extremist claptrap you get forcefed bullshit.*
*by that I mean the following: By flagging 'The Suffering of The Palestinian People' which in essence you mean some Bedouin were doused in effluent and a bunch of ultra orthodox nutjobs may (or may not) have turned a water supply off temporarily, and then conflating that into 'The Suffering', well, everything becomes meaningless.
(PS the third Arab-Israeli war did, in part, start because Syria did really plan on diverting the River Jordan away from Israel.)
As in apartheid South Africa, there's plenty wrong on both sides and as in South Africa there's one very powerful side against a much weaker one. Mind you, there were plenty of folk in the 70s & 80s that refused to see anything wrong with the SA govts actions.
For a chap who's thrown around the anti semite label on here, you don't think you could be a teeny bit racist/Islamaphobic do you?
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"
Re: The Politics Thread
Free speech is not the same as brainwashing young impressionable people, more so those that suffer meltdown on reality.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:32 pmIf you're fine with free speech then you can't have an issue with anyone in the education system either. Though I suspect it goes rather one way.Hoboh wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:06 pmViolence, no problem clamp down on it on any side, I kinda draw the line a little on the 'hate speech' thing because too many view Boo! as hate now a days.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:15 pmWe could start with you not making nonsense up. Though I suspect that's too much to ask.Hoboh wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 3:33 pmSo how's about we start with the brick chucking, riot at any event, black clad masked Ninja's from 'militant' that now have 'Momentum'?I think everyone needs to take responsibility. The whole discourse is distasteful. But we have a right wing dominated press that have behaved for decades in the most shameful and provocative way. That is the biggest scandal in this regard. If you can't admit that then you can't have a sensible discussion about this.
When the wheels come off those little shits or we get licenced to shoot the buggers on sight, chuck in the political pricks and soft arses ruining the education system breeding the I, me, self entitlements, then we maybe able to talk rationally.
I'm very happy to tackle the violent elements on any side of the political spectrum. How about we throw in the BNP its supporters, the EDL and the far right morons who commit acts of violence and incite hatred.
Deal with those on both sides equally. That is fine by me.
If it was rational like the use of the N word etc. No problem but far to many weep at anything now.
- Abdoulaye's Twin
- Legend
- Posts: 9719
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:27 pm
- Location: Skye high
Re: The Politics Thread
Both sides are a bunch of ...ricks with a lot to answer for. It'll never be resolved in our lifetime due to the aforementioned ...ricks.
Re: The Politics Thread
Capitulation, congratulations Theresa and lurch, your shares in Vaseline just increased 300% and are expected to continue to rise when the flakes get up some time this afternoon.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38832
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
In all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
The Israelis have been fighting for their very existence from before the moment of their foundation.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:38 pmFor clarity is your position that the Israelis have never done nothing honest guv it's all them nasty Palestinian?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:08 pmDid you know that the immediate cause of the 1967 war (the Third Arab-Israeli war) was the planned Syrian attempt to divert the waters of the river Jordan away from Israel and deprive Israel of water.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:54 pmHa! Well if I'd said adults you'd have said it was their own fault for voting for Hamas! Much like it was the victims of 7/7 own fault because they voted for Blair?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:21 pmIt's always the poor suffering children, never any suffering adults!Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:44 pmI'm not going to the argue the sides respective claim to the land with you or even the violence on both sides. Some of that's been going on for centuries but that last point is crap and you know it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:09 pmThe only ones suffering are those supporting and ruled by barbaric anti-semite factions such as Hamas.
For starters- the children living in villages without running water because it's been turned off by the illegal settlement next door? How's that the fault of Hamas and not the Israeli govt?
Anyway, I totally dispute any nasty illegal Jewish people have cut off any babies' tap water.![]()
You're right re the settlements and villages. I made them up. Just don't Google Alfei Menashe or Arab ar Ramadin. It was first exposed there by a bunch of anti semites from an Israeli human rights group. Not only did they turn their water off , they dumped their effluent on them too
If you read extremist claptrap you get forcefed bullshit.*
*by that I mean the following: By flagging 'The Suffering of The Palestinian People' which in essence you mean some Bedouin were doused in effluent and a bunch of ultra orthodox nutjobs may (or may not) have turned a water supply off temporarily, and then conflating that into 'The Suffering', well, everything becomes meaningless.
(PS the third Arab-Israeli war did, in part, start because Syria did really plan on diverting the River Jordan away from Israel.)
Because all I seem to see is denials and obfuscation.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
lo Re: The Politics Thread
Jesus H. Christ! How difficult is this?Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:41 pmWell I suppose I could have referred to the random demolition of houses, the destruction of Olive trees, the restrictions on medical aid and supplies but I suspect you'd choose to pretend that's not happening either.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:08 pmDid you know that the immediate cause of the 1967 war (the Third Arab-Israeli war) was the planned Syrian attempt to divert the waters of the river Jordan away from Israel and deprive Israel of water.Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:54 pmHa! Well if I'd said adults you'd have said it was their own fault for voting for Hamas! Much like it was the victims of 7/7 own fault because they voted for Blair?Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:21 pmIt's always the poor suffering children, never any suffering adults!Harry Genshaw wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 10:44 pmI'm not going to the argue the sides respective claim to the land with you or even the violence on both sides. Some of that's been going on for centuries but that last point is crap and you know it.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:09 pmThe only ones suffering are those supporting and ruled by barbaric anti-semite factions such as Hamas.
For starters- the children living in villages without running water because it's been turned off by the illegal settlement next door? How's that the fault of Hamas and not the Israeli govt?
Anyway, I totally dispute any nasty illegal Jewish people have cut off any babies' tap water.![]()
You're right re the settlements and villages. I made them up. Just don't Google Alfei Menashe or Arab ar Ramadin. It was first exposed there by a bunch of anti semites from an Israeli human rights group. Not only did they turn their water off , they dumped their effluent on them too
If you read extremist claptrap you get forcefed bullshit.*
*by that I mean the following: By flagging 'The Suffering of The Palestinian People' which in essence you mean some Bedouin were doused in effluent and a bunch of ultra orthodox nutjobs may (or may not) have turned a water supply off temporarily, and then conflating that into 'The Suffering', well, everything becomes meaningless.
(PS the third Arab-Israeli war did, in part, start because Syria did really plan on diverting the River Jordan away from Israel.)
As in apartheid South Africa, there's plenty wrong on both sides and as in South Africa there's one very powerful side against a much weaker one. Mind you, there were plenty of folk in the 70s & 80s that refused to see anything wrong with the SA govts actions.
For a chap who's thrown around the anti semite label on here, you don't think you could be a teeny bit racist/Islamaphobic do you?

Yes, I am very much Islamophobic. I'm also Judaeophobic and Christianophobic, though not to the same extent (because they don't threaten me in such an existential manner). I totally deny being racist in any manner whatsoever.
But for you to be so pro-Palestine, denies the balance that you supposedly proclaim. To state there's plenty wrong on both sides but declare The Suffering of the Palestinian People, seems to me to be biased. It's usually the basis of such bias is grounded in profound anti-Semitism.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
^ There are already media reports blaming Israel for a number of injuries of Palestinians. Palestine Red Crescent stating 51 injured including one seriously, and denouncing Israeli authorities.
And why? Because thousands of protesters stirred up by Hamas have been out hurling stones, and others firing rockets, because the US recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Nothing's changed, nobody killed or harmed, but Hamas screams "Death to America" and Fatah unleashes its Day of Rage - and against whom, America, Trump? No.
Blame on both sides, I think not. But no doubt in weeks to come I'll be directed via Google to somebody having lost their life because of an Israeli rubber bullet or such - thus the Suffering of The Palestinians continueth.
And why? Because thousands of protesters stirred up by Hamas have been out hurling stones, and others firing rockets, because the US recognises Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Nothing's changed, nobody killed or harmed, but Hamas screams "Death to America" and Fatah unleashes its Day of Rage - and against whom, America, Trump? No.
Blame on both sides, I think not. But no doubt in weeks to come I'll be directed via Google to somebody having lost their life because of an Israeli rubber bullet or such - thus the Suffering of The Palestinians continueth.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Re: The Politics Thread
You might feel like we are in a corner in much the same position of many remainers, it is of your own making, accepting lock, stock and barrel anything the EU dictated as red lines and facts, we must capitulate.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:05 pmIn all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
May should have taken a strong line herself and after a while sense on both sides would have preveiled.
This 'deal' on the face of it has sold out many who voted Brexit, free unhindered movement of people, ECJ interference and paying for projects well past our 'leaving date', for what? A promise that we will now have talks on trade, don't hold your breath, we caved in once the EU will expect it to be the norm now.
Don't know why we don't go the whole hog now, stay and join the Euro and welcome commisioners Blair and Clegg to lead us to a brighter future!
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Just seen a video of Barack Obama stating that he considers Jerusalem the capital of Israel. You know the liberal, lovely bloke before the current crackpot?
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
boltonboris wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:25 pmJust seen a video of Barack Obama stating that he considers Jerusalem the capital of Israel. You know the liberal, lovely bloke before the current crackpot?

That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38832
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
Well, I dont think she should have taken a hard line but you are correct that we are now bending over and taking it.Hoboh wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:42 pmYou might feel like we are in a corner in much the same position of many remainers, it is of your own making, accepting lock, stock and barrel anything the EU dictated as red lines and facts, we must capitulate.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:05 pmIn all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
May should have taken a strong line herself and after a while sense on both sides would have preveiled.
This 'deal' on the face of it has sold out many who voted Brexit, free unhindered movement of people, ECJ interference and paying for projects well past our 'leaving date', for what? A promise that we will now have talks on trade, don't hold your breath, we caved in once the EU will expect it to be the norm now.
Don't know why we don't go the whole hog now, stay and join the Euro and welcome commisioners Blair and Clegg to lead us to a brighter future!
However, she isn't politically strong enough to take a hard line. Funnily enough you'd be better off with Jeremy in office, he'd be more likely to deliver the sort of Brexit you want. He would have had far less to lose other than annoy the Pro EU Labour MPs, and he isn't exactly shy of that. Also he'd not have any concerns with pressure from big business. And deep down he's probably less of an EU fan than May.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
...and yet strangely enough the Parliamentary Labour Party aren't overly enthusiastic about Brexit. If anything they are, in the main, hostile to it.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:46 pmWell, I dont think she should have taken a hard line but you are correct that we are now bending over and taking it.Hoboh wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:42 pmYou might feel like we are in a corner in much the same position of many remainers, it is of your own making, accepting lock, stock and barrel anything the EU dictated as red lines and facts, we must capitulate.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:05 pmIn all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
May should have taken a strong line herself and after a while sense on both sides would have preveiled.
This 'deal' on the face of it has sold out many who voted Brexit, free unhindered movement of people, ECJ interference and paying for projects well past our 'leaving date', for what? A promise that we will now have talks on trade, don't hold your breath, we caved in once the EU will expect it to be the norm now.
Don't know why we don't go the whole hog now, stay and join the Euro and welcome commisioners Blair and Clegg to lead us to a brighter future!
However, she isn't politically strong enough to take a hard line. Funnily enough you'd be better off with Jeremy in office, he'd be more likely to deliver the sort of Brexit you want. He would have had far less to lose other than annoy the Pro EU Labour MPs, and he isn't exactly shy of that. Also he'd not have any concerns with pressure from big business. And deep down he's probably less of an EU fan than May.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38832
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The Politics Thread
They're split, just like the Tories. Probably in reverse in that the most vocal are Pro EU, but still.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:02 pm...and yet strangely enough the Parliamentary Labour Party aren't overly enthusiastic about Brexit. If anything they are, in the main, hostile to it.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:46 pmWell, I dont think she should have taken a hard line but you are correct that we are now bending over and taking it.Hoboh wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:42 pmYou might feel like we are in a corner in much the same position of many remainers, it is of your own making, accepting lock, stock and barrel anything the EU dictated as red lines and facts, we must capitulate.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:05 pmIn all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
May should have taken a strong line herself and after a while sense on both sides would have preveiled.
This 'deal' on the face of it has sold out many who voted Brexit, free unhindered movement of people, ECJ interference and paying for projects well past our 'leaving date', for what? A promise that we will now have talks on trade, don't hold your breath, we caved in once the EU will expect it to be the norm now.
Don't know why we don't go the whole hog now, stay and join the Euro and welcome commisioners Blair and Clegg to lead us to a brighter future!
However, she isn't politically strong enough to take a hard line. Funnily enough you'd be better off with Jeremy in office, he'd be more likely to deliver the sort of Brexit you want. He would have had far less to lose other than annoy the Pro EU Labour MPs, and he isn't exactly shy of that. Also he'd not have any concerns with pressure from big business. And deep down he's probably less of an EU fan than May.
May cannot be seen to be abandoning the financial sector and big business she's too reliant on them politically. And they do not want a hard Brexit. They generally don't want a Brexit at all.
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
I know.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:59 pmThey're split, just like the Tories. Probably in reverse in that the most vocal are Pro EU, but still.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:02 pm...and yet strangely enough the Parliamentary Labour Party aren't overly enthusiastic about Brexit. If anything they are, in the main, hostile to it.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 8:46 pmWell, I dont think she should have taken a hard line but you are correct that we are now bending over and taking it.Hoboh wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:42 pmYou might feel like we are in a corner in much the same position of many remainers, it is of your own making, accepting lock, stock and barrel anything the EU dictated as red lines and facts, we must capitulate.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 12:05 pmIn all seriousness, what choice did they have? We're in a corner here, despite what you might like to pretend. The government haven't got the lee-way to fight anyone, especially Business who already feel they don't have the information they need and need the trade talks to have started yesterday.
The Government have backed themselves and us into a corner. Our biggest bargaining chips of remaining in the single market and customs union in some form, were thrown off the table due to pressure from the right of the Tory party. So what are we actually taking into talks? A begging bowl and a wish it seems to me.
May should have taken a strong line herself and after a while sense on both sides would have preveiled.
This 'deal' on the face of it has sold out many who voted Brexit, free unhindered movement of people, ECJ interference and paying for projects well past our 'leaving date', for what? A promise that we will now have talks on trade, don't hold your breath, we caved in once the EU will expect it to be the norm now.
Don't know why we don't go the whole hog now, stay and join the Euro and welcome commisioners Blair and Clegg to lead us to a brighter future!
However, she isn't politically strong enough to take a hard line. Funnily enough you'd be better off with Jeremy in office, he'd be more likely to deliver the sort of Brexit you want. He would have had far less to lose other than annoy the Pro EU Labour MPs, and he isn't exactly shy of that. Also he'd not have any concerns with pressure from big business. And deep down he's probably less of an EU fan than May.
May cannot be seen to be abandoning the financial sector and big business she's too reliant on them politically. And they do not want a hard Brexit. They generally don't want a Brexit at all.

It's almost like democracy is irrelevant, or we were all brainwashed, or we all meant something else entirely, or ( more to the point) we were morons and the intelligensia are restoring the natural order of things...
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
But then again, you'd need the Muslims in Beirut, Cairo, Astana, and every other Muslim majority shithole to stop violently protesting. Not a hope in hell.Lost Leopard Spot wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 6:14 pmboltonboris wrote: ↑Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:25 pmJust seen a video of Barack Obama stating that he considers Jerusalem the capital of Israel. You know the liberal, lovely bloke before the current crackpot?Fxck me sideways. All we need next is the Pope, the Aga Khan, and Donald Tusk for world peace to prevail.
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
- Lost Leopard Spot
- Immortal
- Posts: 18436
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2012 11:14 am
- Location: In the long grass, hunting for a watering hole.
Re: The Politics Thread
Ooooh, let me think, out of all the constituencies in this country which one would I have ranked last to be corrupt. Tower Hamlets? nope...
That's not a leopard!
頑張ってください
頑張ってください
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests