creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:08 am

Worthy4England wrote:
Mon Dec 27, 2021 12:52 pm
Well at least Joe won't be able to point at the bowling being off, unless he seriously believes this is a 150 wicket...

We could get beat by "an innings and", with the oppo having scored less than 300...
^^

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Prufrock » Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:30 am

Boland is the man of the match.

Boland? Is England trying to figure out how you win a test match.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

nicholaldo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2639
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:23 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by nicholaldo » Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:45 am

Silverwood just claimed in his post-match interview there are "positives coming out of this". I can only assume he was referring to the touring group's lateral flow tests.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Tue Dec 28, 2021 3:31 am

nicholaldo wrote:
Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:45 am
Silverwood just claimed in his post-match interview there are "positives coming out of this". I can only assume he was referring to the touring group's lateral flow tests.
The positive might be that he gets sacked……

User avatar
Dujon
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3340
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 1:37 am
Location: Australia, near Sydney, NSW
Contact:

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Dujon » Tue Dec 28, 2021 6:36 am

Well, that was disappointing. :conf:

Maybe BWFC_Insane is right after all? Boland was a revelation or the England bats appalling. I am still trying to figure out which. :crazy:
Last edited by Dujon on Tue Dec 28, 2021 6:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by jimbo » Tue Dec 28, 2021 6:58 am

nicholaldo wrote:
Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:45 am
Silverwood just claimed in his post-match interview there are "positives coming out of this". I can only assume he was referring to the touring group's lateral flow tests.
We’ve managed the workload of Anderson, Wood and Robinson so they’ll be fresh for Sydney. All part of the 2 year plan.

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by jimbo » Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:00 am

Dujon wrote:
Tue Dec 28, 2021 6:36 am
Well, that was disappointing. :conf:

Maybe BWFC_Insane is right after all? Boland was a revelation or the England bats appalling. I am still trying to figure out which. :crazy:
Our batting is historically bad. It’s on another level. Here they’ve come up against good quick accurate bowling and have just been blown apart.

User avatar
Harry Genshaw
Legend
Legend
Posts: 9404
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Half dead in Panama

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Harry Genshaw » Tue Dec 28, 2021 9:11 am

Just seen the score :shock:

Fookin ell that is plumbing whole new depths. Embarrassing.
"Get your feet off the furniture you Oxbridge tw*t. You're not on a feckin punt now you know"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Dec 29, 2021 4:26 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Mon Dec 27, 2021 8:14 am

I come back to our batsmen are lazy and don’t deserve any excuse.
I think it's a little more deep-rooted than that. Don't you?

Where's county cricket's incentive to produce test players?

The more the onus at local level lies with producing batsmen who can smack it into the carpark in a short overs game in front of a full house and the tv cameras, the less clubs will give a fig about teaching aspiring players to patiently pick off the bad ball.

Face it, if you were on the board/staff of say Leicestershire, Grace Road will never be on the test circuit, so why train players to play the game in a way which is of no benefit, detrimental even, to your club? You'll lose them anyway if they do start to look like a test cricketer.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:57 pm

Agree Brucie, I also think County Championship isn't strong enough/fit enough...Pope averaged 78, Malan 73...you'd expect that to translate into nailed on 40+ average in tests...then there a whole list of 40+ county championship averaging failures...

Our third highest test run scorer in 2021? Extras on 412...

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38821
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by BWFC_Insane » Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:38 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Wed Dec 29, 2021 4:26 pm
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Mon Dec 27, 2021 8:14 am

I come back to our batsmen are lazy and don’t deserve any excuse.
I think it's a little more deep-rooted than that. Don't you?

Where's county cricket's incentive to produce test players?

The more the onus at local level lies with producing batsmen who can smack it into the carpark in a short overs game in front of a full house and the tv cameras, the less clubs will give a fig about teaching aspiring players to patiently pick off the bad ball.

Face it, if you were on the board/staff of say Leicestershire, Grace Road will never be on the test circuit, so why train players to play the game in a way which is of no benefit, detrimental even, to your club? You'll lose them anyway if they do start to look like a test cricketer.
I absolutely agree. The whole system is a problem. But it doesn’t excuse the current lot from continually making the same mistakes, and just being allowed to carry on doing so. Where is the effort to transform themselves into batsmen who can do jobs in test cricket?

They might not be good enough but they aren’t as bad as losing to an innings and with a score of under 300 on the board. The lack of application annoys me. They aren’t and weren’t ever beating Australia or even coming close. But we just surrender. You see someone like Buttler who clearly isn’t test match quality has worked so hard to try and have some resistance in his batting. Sure It’s not his game. But at least he’s tried to transition. I see the rest and they just look like they can’t be bothered. The Silverwood tells us there are positives after drubbing number 3. It’s lazy. The one day side had failures and people started to do something about it and not just ‘accepting it’. Yet here at every level people don’t want to address the issues in the last half decade that have left us with an embarrassing test side. People just want to pretend it’s not happening.

Including the current players and coaching.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:43 pm

Well at least we have this to look forwards to.

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jan 04, 2022 9:49 pm

:lol: ffs
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:25 pm

Looks greenish again...might be another to bowl first on...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:41 pm

Or not as the case might be...we've got half a chance of not being in our second inning on day 2 here...

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Prufrock » Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:57 pm

Maybe they'll declare immediately.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:59 pm

Prufrock wrote:
Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:57 pm
Maybe they'll declare immediately.
Lol. :-)

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:47 am

We've got to be fairly happy with that start, haven't we?

Well, let's put it another way; there'd be no shortage of criticism if we were 126-3 after Day One.
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24832
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Prufrock » Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:09 am

Particularly given from the morning session I saw it did absolutely nothing.

Forecast rain again today (or is it tomorrow?. Tonight, anyway) and Day 5. Think it's going to all come down to whether we can bat properly in our first innings. If we do I'd give us a good chance of a glorious draw!
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Re: creeeeeeeekeeeeeet

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Jan 05, 2022 12:35 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:47 am
We've got to be fairly happy with that start, haven't we?

Well, let's put it another way; there'd be no shortage of criticism if we were 126-3 after Day One.
It's not unreasonable Brucie. We'd get criticism at 126-3, because that's highly likely to head towards 180 all out...on a good day :-)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests