The ianevattable sacking
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Didn’t we address that with Matete?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:36 pmOne of the comments about Mark Robins exiting Coventry. "The fact that Robins bought more attackers in the summer but neglected to fix the engine room was a baffling failure in a league as physical and intense as the Championship" Not sure that only applies in the Championship TBF.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Not that I've seen so far. Our MF has looked overall "shakier" than last year, we're leaky as fcuk and I'd be surprised if we'd scored as many per game, do you think it's improved?The_Gun wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:44 pmDidn’t we address that with Matete?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:36 pmOne of the comments about Mark Robins exiting Coventry. "The fact that Robins bought more attackers in the summer but neglected to fix the engine room was a baffling failure in a league as physical and intense as the Championship" Not sure that only applies in the Championship TBF.
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The ianevattable sacking
It's all changed and still is doing. I reckon a few more surprises will emerge as we play those we haven't yet seen. We'll need a bit of "any which way but loose" as our mission statement. .Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:59 pmNot that I've seen so far. Our MF has looked overall "shakier" than last year, we're leaky as fcuk and I'd be surprised if we'd scored as many per game, do you think it's improved?The_Gun wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:44 pmDidn’t we address that with Matete?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:36 pmOne of the comments about Mark Robins exiting Coventry. "The fact that Robins bought more attackers in the summer but neglected to fix the engine room was a baffling failure in a league as physical and intense as the Championship" Not sure that only applies in the Championship TBF.



Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
Re: The ianevattable sacking
‘Dunno’ is my considered answerWorthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:59 pmNot that I've seen so far. Our MF has looked overall "shakier" than last year, we're leaky as fcuk and I'd be surprised if we'd scored as many per game, do you think it's improved?The_Gun wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:44 pmDidn’t we address that with Matete?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:36 pmOne of the comments about Mark Robins exiting Coventry. "The fact that Robins bought more attackers in the summer but neglected to fix the engine room was a baffling failure in a league as physical and intense as the Championship" Not sure that only applies in the Championship TBF.

Judging off the first few games of the season I’d be inclined to agree with you, but lately things seem to have improved. Matete is definitely the most athletic ball winning type we’ve had in a long while, so I’m optimistic that he should be a nice compliment to Sheehan and Thomason going forward.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Pretty much where I'm at. It's not a poor L1 midfield. It wasn't a poor L1 midfield last season. I'm not sure it's a MF that gets us in the autos.The_Gun wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 9:13 am‘Dunno’ is my considered answerWorthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:59 pmNot that I've seen so far. Our MF has looked overall "shakier" than last year, we're leaky as fcuk and I'd be surprised if we'd scored as many per game, do you think it's improved?The_Gun wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:44 pmDidn’t we address that with Matete?Worthy4England wrote: ↑Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:36 pmOne of the comments about Mark Robins exiting Coventry. "The fact that Robins bought more attackers in the summer but neglected to fix the engine room was a baffling failure in a league as physical and intense as the Championship" Not sure that only applies in the Championship TBF.![]()
Judging off the first few games of the season I’d be inclined to agree with you, but lately things seem to have improved. Matete is definitely the most athletic ball winning type we’ve had in a long while, so I’m optimistic that he should be a nice compliment to Sheehan and Thomason going forward.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31632
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The ianevattable sacking
We've got a table-topping midfielder, but he's out on loan....
Matete at his best definitely adds another dimension. He's been promoted three times and while he didn't exactly do that single-handedly like Maradona in Mexico, he's certainly got something. He started slowly but they all did. Maybe the content download was buffering. Certainly looked that way with the early 3-4-2-1.
The problem in midfield is now a lack of depth with Tomo and Dempsey out. When they're back, with Sheehan and Matete and possibly Morley (who's still the closest Sheehan comparison, although I get that not everyone likes that), that's a decent centre-midfield selection. (I'm afraid I still don't get what an Arfield is.)
The summer spending seems lopsided, but we did lose two fairly regular strikers in Bod and Jerome and only really added one (McAtee). The RWB we signed (who I guess may not have been first choice) has been injured. The big imposing centre-back we signed has been injured. We did try to fill some holes, even if the hole-fillers haven't all yet excelled. Indeed, of the summer signings you might say Schon (if erratic) has done the most so far. He's certainly had the most minutes - I make it 1279, compared to Matete 995, McAtee 963, Southwood 810, Arfield 531, Forino 395, Osei-Tutu 308, Lolos 174.

Matete at his best definitely adds another dimension. He's been promoted three times and while he didn't exactly do that single-handedly like Maradona in Mexico, he's certainly got something. He started slowly but they all did. Maybe the content download was buffering. Certainly looked that way with the early 3-4-2-1.
The problem in midfield is now a lack of depth with Tomo and Dempsey out. When they're back, with Sheehan and Matete and possibly Morley (who's still the closest Sheehan comparison, although I get that not everyone likes that), that's a decent centre-midfield selection. (I'm afraid I still don't get what an Arfield is.)
The summer spending seems lopsided, but we did lose two fairly regular strikers in Bod and Jerome and only really added one (McAtee). The RWB we signed (who I guess may not have been first choice) has been injured. The big imposing centre-back we signed has been injured. We did try to fill some holes, even if the hole-fillers haven't all yet excelled. Indeed, of the summer signings you might say Schon (if erratic) has done the most so far. He's certainly had the most minutes - I make it 1279, compared to Matete 995, McAtee 963, Southwood 810, Arfield 531, Forino 395, Osei-Tutu 308, Lolos 174.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
I think Morley's stats at Wycombe are pretty similar to Sheehan's. Last season, he looked a long way off. The one that's most obviously different is long balls.
As to the other bits, we went into last couple of league weeks playing Matete and Sheehan (so didn't directly replace Demps, for me) but McAtee, Collins and Adeboyejo seemed to work in front of them in the last couple of games. It's going to be "interesting" when everyone is back fit...

As to the other bits, we went into last couple of league weeks playing Matete and Sheehan (so didn't directly replace Demps, for me) but McAtee, Collins and Adeboyejo seemed to work in front of them in the last couple of games. It's going to be "interesting" when everyone is back fit...
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31632
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Folk seem to be saying the 3-4-2-1 works better against back fours. It's good that we can switch - something I've said since at least season two that Evatt should be getting his teams to do. Question is what we do today if Stockport play their usual back three.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 11:36 amI think Morley's stats at Wycombe are pretty similar to Sheehan's. Last season, he looked a long way off. The one that's most obviously different is long balls.![]()
As to the other bits, we went into last couple of league weeks playing Matete and Sheehan (so didn't directly replace Demps, for me) but McAtee, Collins and Adeboyejo seemed to work in front of them in the last couple of games. It's going to be "interesting" when everyone is back fit...
- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Folk seem to be saying the 3-4-2-1 works better against back fours. It's good that we can switch - something I've said since at least season two that Evatt should be getting his teams to do. Question is what we do today if Stockport play their usual back three.
[/quote]
Flatten em.



Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Got
To
Go
Now
To
Go
Now
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Everything counts, in large amounts....
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Put it this way - is there anyone now who doesn’t want him to go?
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38823
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Forget sacking him. Any half respectable human being would have resigned now. Evatt is happy to take the money. Doesn’t even have the bottle to walk when he knows he’s failed.
Re: The ianevattable sacking
It would cost him hundreds of thousands of pounds to walk.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 5:11 pmForget sacking him. Any half respectable human being would have resigned now. Evatt is happy to take the money. Doesn’t even have the bottle to walk when he knows he’s failed.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38823
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Yep. And he knows Sharon is too spineless to act. So he has a lovely cushy number. At our expense.The_Gun wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 6:26 pmIt would cost him hundreds of thousands of pounds to walk.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 5:11 pmForget sacking him. Any half respectable human being would have resigned now. Evatt is happy to take the money. Doesn’t even have the bottle to walk when he knows he’s failed.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34734
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
No. It wouldn't cost him anything. It would prevent future income. They're not the same thing.The_Gun wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 6:26 pmIt would cost him hundreds of thousands of pounds to walk.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 5:11 pmForget sacking him. Any half respectable human being would have resigned now. Evatt is happy to take the money. Doesn’t even have the bottle to walk when he knows he’s failed.
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38823
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Maybe he’s already gambled on future earnings? Ooooerrr. I mean he has form.Worthy4England wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 6:41 pmNo. It wouldn't cost him anything. It would prevent future income. They're not the same thing.The_Gun wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 6:26 pmIt would cost him hundreds of thousands of pounds to walk.BWFC_Insane wrote: ↑Sat Nov 09, 2024 5:11 pmForget sacking him. Any half respectable human being would have resigned now. Evatt is happy to take the money. Doesn’t even have the bottle to walk when he knows he’s failed.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The ianevattable sacking
At least we know we can count our local journalist to ask some questions and not be flattered by any video messages he may (allegedly) send!
- BWFC_Insane
- Immortal
- Posts: 38823
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm
Re: The ianevattable sacking
Oh good the video is now circulating social media. Put me right off my tea. Ughhh.
I don’t need managers to be likeable. If they win.
But Evatt is a terrible manager and a terrible person all in one. It’s hard to find anything to redeem even the tiniest morsel of sympathy.
I don’t need managers to be likeable. If they win.
But Evatt is a terrible manager and a terrible person all in one. It’s hard to find anything to redeem even the tiniest morsel of sympathy.
- officer_dibble
- Immortal
- Posts: 15295
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:33 pm
- Location: Leeds
Re: The ianevattable sacking
But he loves Jesus and that innit so he must be alright…
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], The_Gun and 31 guests