NFL Football
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Woods is out there by some way when it comes to sports earners. They say he'll be the first sports billionaire.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
The average pay in American Football will beat most other sports. There are only 32 teams, and no real feeding sytem like minor leagues or divisions in proper football. Due to the salary cap the top paid NFL players wont hit the top of that list, but they would probably dominate the 50-150 slots along with Baseball. £100k a week is still only £5.2 million per year. That's roughly $9 million US. There are plenty of NFL footballers on or near that who arent in the class of Beckham in their sport.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
They too have a salary cap, which leads to ridiculous top end deals (because one player can actually make a team) and a boat load of low dollar bottom deals.
I like basketball, after proper Football, Baseball, and American Football. when played well it is a good game to watch, which is why I prefer college basketball. It's a good game to watch at an arena. I know that most of the English dont like it, but I grew up playing the game with friends.
I like basketball, after proper Football, Baseball, and American Football. when played well it is a good game to watch, which is why I prefer college basketball. It's a good game to watch at an arena. I know that most of the English dont like it, but I grew up playing the game with friends.
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
I only played Rugby to Schoolboy County level... So I suppose it got more complex after that...communistworkethic wrote:and clearly you don't understand the complexity of rugby.norm the jedi wrote:I would have thought if Rugby players were suited and equipped to play in the NFL they'd be there..
They've goy Aussie rules boys and Polynesian croc wrestlers.. So if Rugby had someone who could break for 1000 yards a season the NFL would not be slow to wave $20 mill under his nose.. Clearly the joy of slooging around in the mud cuddling some other fat public school boys would be difficult to leave but I think a couple would make the switch.. as long as they had a 'setting fire to my farts is Ok entertainment clause on the contract
Fact is very few are able to make a fist of it and those that have enjoyed any success as such are speciality players, punters and place kickers..
Jonah Lomuh was scouted and whilst he possessed the physicality he wasn't actually up too much when faced with 6 guys in front of him who were similarly equipped and raised on raw steak.. So yeah he's big and quick but unfortunately defensive lines are not generally populated with too many Underwoods to stamp on..
It's Like any game once you actually know something about it you grow to appreciate the complexity..
Or you can take the Baseball... that's rounders with Hotdogs.. approach ... and look like a bit of a tit..
No the New York Giants scouted him, visited him and concluded in consultation with him that he had more prospects of a top flight career as a Rugby player..Lomuh scouted? Ha hahahaha ! You mean they watched him? Bit of a difference.
He trained with their coaching staff and went through their trial process... Seems like an interest..And besides he has no interest in the game, he's a rugby player through and through
No doubt but I doubt he commanded the wage of a top flight first choice NFL running backand fantasticly wealthy as a result of it.
Most lineman would hand Andy Farrel his head and carry him back to the locker room on one shoulder with or without padding.. Mainly because they outweigh him by approx 10 stone and generally spend all day wrestling similar sized opponents who incidentally they are not allowed to grab hold of or pull to the floor.. As for padding the NFL historically only ever introduce changes in safety kit when someone died or was seriously injured [and when I played Rugby League even good players wore shoulder paddingNot as good against 6 big men? No shit!!?? Like a "footballer" couldn't take being hit without all his pads by Andy Farrell or Andrew Sheridan.
Relevant as it was his performance against ludicrously undermatched three quarters which attracted the interest of New York. It was also the period prior to his illnes when even people who understand the complexities of Rugger would say he was at the height of his powers..Underwood? 10 years too late norm. Do try and keep up.
never made or supported the arguement.. Said they were different and if the skill set was transferable there'd be Rugby palyers in the NFL.. which there aren'tyou keep on with this superiority argument as it's laughable.
Opinion expressed as fact.. As a general rule the NFL comes looking rather than the other way round, as in the Lomu exampleLots of Rugby League players don't make it in union and vice versa very few top rugby players ever bother looking at "football" as an option, why should they?
Which is not to say that most NFL starters comfortably out earn their premiership or Superleague equivalentsNot all players are on multimillion dollar contracts.
It's them complexities again... Top players will play every down on their side of the ball usually about 26 minutes where the ball is in play and 100% power is requiredGridron relies soley on shirt bursts of energy amongst 40+ players each of whom do about 20 minutes actual work a game.
over a game that requires endurance..
Fair arguement for League but how long is the ball in play in an 80 minute union game, and of that 50 minutes how much time does a back line three quarter player actually spend at 100%Rugby requires all 15/13 players on the pitch (subject to bloodbaths) for the whole game. The two lots of atheletes are conditioned totally differently.
True enough if it was supported by the rest of your posts where you coat off American sport and 'Football' throughout despite a tenuous knowledge of the sport..Clearly none of you can grasp the idea that to say one sport is superior to the other is like saying apples are better than oranges.
What does the F in RFU stand for..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2234
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 12:03 am
- Location: Portland, Maine USA
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
again nonsense. Not one place can you say I've "coated off" American sport.norm the jedi wrote:I only played Rugby to Schoolboy County level... So I suppose it got more complex after that...communistworkethic wrote:and clearly you don't understand the complexity of rugby.norm the jedi wrote:I would have thought if Rugby players were suited and equipped to play in the NFL they'd be there..
They've goy Aussie rules boys and Polynesian croc wrestlers.. So if Rugby had someone who could break for 1000 yards a season the NFL would not be slow to wave $20 mill under his nose.. Clearly the joy of slooging around in the mud cuddling some other fat public school boys would be difficult to leave but I think a couple would make the switch.. as long as they had a 'setting fire to my farts is Ok entertainment clause on the contract
Fact is very few are able to make a fist of it and those that have enjoyed any success as such are speciality players, punters and place kickers..
Jonah Lomuh was scouted and whilst he possessed the physicality he wasn't actually up too much when faced with 6 guys in front of him who were similarly equipped and raised on raw steak.. So yeah he's big and quick but unfortunately defensive lines are not generally populated with too many Underwoods to stamp on..
It's Like any game once you actually know something about it you grow to appreciate the complexity..
Or you can take the Baseball... that's rounders with Hotdogs.. approach ... and look like a bit of a tit..
No the New York Giants scouted him, visited him and concluded in consultation with him that he had more prospects of a top flight career as a Rugby player..Lomuh scouted? Ha hahahaha ! You mean they watched him? Bit of a difference.He trained with their coaching staff and went through their trial process... Seems like an interest..And besides he has no interest in the game, he's a rugby player through and throughNo doubt but I doubt he commanded the wage of a top flight first choice NFL running backand fantasticly wealthy as a result of it.Most lineman would hand Andy Farrel his head and carry him back to the locker room on one shoulder with or without padding.. Mainly because they outweigh him by approx 10 stone and generally spend all day wrestling similar sized opponents who incidentally they are not allowed to grab hold of or pull to the floor.. As for padding the NFL historically only ever introduce changes in safety kit when someone died or was seriously injured [and when I played Rugby League even good players wore shoulder paddingNot as good against 6 big men? No shit!!?? Like a "footballer" couldn't take being hit without all his pads by Andy Farrell or Andrew Sheridan.Relevant as it was his performance against ludicrously undermatched three quarters which attracted the interest of New York. It was also the period prior to his illnes when even people who understand the complexities of Rugger would say he was at the height of his powers..Underwood? 10 years too late norm. Do try and keep up.
never made or supported the arguement.. Said they were different and if the skill set was transferable there'd be Rugby palyers in the NFL.. which there aren'tyou keep on with this superiority argument as it's laughable.Opinion expressed as fact.. As a general rule the NFL comes looking rather than the other way round, as in the Lomu exampleLots of Rugby League players don't make it in union and vice versa very few top rugby players ever bother looking at "football" as an option, why should they?Which is not to say that most NFL starters comfortably out earn their premiership or Superleague equivalentsNot all players are on multimillion dollar contracts.It's them complexities again... Top players will play every down on their side of the ball usually about 26 minutes where the ball is in play and 100% power is requiredGridron relies soley on shirt bursts of energy amongst 40+ players each of whom do about 20 minutes actual work a game.
over a game that requires endurance..Fair arguement for League but how long is the ball in play in an 80 minute union game, and of that 50 minutes how much time does a back line three quarter player actually spend at 100%Rugby requires all 15/13 players on the pitch (subject to bloodbaths) for the whole game. The two lots of atheletes are conditioned totally differently.
True enough if it was supported by the rest of your posts where you coat off American sport and 'Football' throughout despite a tenuous knowledge of the sport..Clearly none of you can grasp the idea that to say one sport is superior to the other is like saying apples are better than oranges.
What does the F in RFU stand for..
players play every down? Like who? Offensive teams, defensive teams and special teams. What? maybe 2 tackles and a couple of linebackers are on the pitch all the game? and how much rest do they get between plays and between quarters? You can't make rash statements about fitness in that context.
10 stone heavy than andy farrell? Clueless in the extreme. 28stone players eh?

Wrestling other guys all day? - go see RL training.
Lomuh's "trial" was part of a sponsors arrangement. Just like when Botham went to try out baseball.
F= Football, as it is a vital part of the sport in open play and the game derives from Football at Rugby School.
Oh and just to make the point - I watch and participated in all 3, which I guess is more than you. I like NFL but the bigger fitter cleverer argument that has been purported on here is frankly ridiculous and does fans of the sport no service whatsoever.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
To be fair, Norm didn't say they played every down - he said on their side of the ball, i.e. every offensive or defensive down. No one in pro football plays everydown these days. Linebackers are on the defensive team only - I suppose an offensive tackle could play defensive tackle in an emergency but I doubt it happens much.players play every down? Like who? Offensive teams, defensive teams and special teams. What? maybe 2 tackles and a couple of linebackers are on the pitch all the game? and how much rest do they get between plays and between quarters? You can't make rash statements about fitness in that context.
I have played both games (touch variety of US one), watched both and enjoyed both. The comparisons are silly and inappropriate in my view.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
communistworkethic wrote: I like NFL but the bigger fitter cleverer argument that has been purported on here is frankly ridiculous and does fans of the sport no service whatsoever.
http://www.bench-press.net/article/larr ... press.html
Larry Allens bench press is 700lbs
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
Cleveland Browns Nose tackle... Ted Washington 365 pounds... Slim chaps like Larry Alan weigh in at 325 and skinny ones slink embarassed off the scale at 305.. and as you know Nose tackles generally take on two opposing blockers all day... Andy currently weighs in at 240.. according to Saracens..10 stone heavy than andy farrell? Clueless in the extreme. 28stone players eh?![]()

fell free to quibble over a stone or two points the same.. in a straight fight Mr Farrell is road kill..pads or not..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
usually best to use good examples in your argument....norm the jedi wrote:Cleveland Browns Nose tackle... Ted Washington 365 pounds... Slim chaps like Larry Alan weigh in at 325 and skinny ones slink embarassed off the scale at 305.. and as you know Nose tackles generally take on two opposing blockers all day... Andy currently weighs in at 240.. according to Saracens..10 stone heavy than andy farrell? Clueless in the extreme. 28stone players eh?![]()
![]()
fell free to quibble over a stone or two points the same.. in a straight fight Mr Farrell is road kill..pads or not..

power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:38 pm
- Location: england
-
- Dedicated
- Posts: 1058
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 3:11 pm
- Location: Near a Shandy
- Contact:
The arguement was Lineman v Andy Farrell... So I quote lineman stats... what were you expecting the weight of a couple of Punters...
but while we're on good examples.. Andy isn't one... A quick look at Wigan and Saints current squads shows Andy as fifth heavyiest out of 50 super league first teamers
Who as a group weigh on averafe at a smidge over 210.... So Big Ted Aside... still a cosy 115 below Larry Allen.. and 95 below a skinny LINEMAN... Most of whom get fined if they go below 300.. and usually get weighed for statos at camp before bulking on another 30-40 lbs before kick off...
All athletes just different..

but while we're on good examples.. Andy isn't one... A quick look at Wigan and Saints current squads shows Andy as fifth heavyiest out of 50 super league first teamers
Who as a group weigh on averafe at a smidge over 210.... So Big Ted Aside... still a cosy 115 below Larry Allen.. and 95 below a skinny LINEMAN... Most of whom get fined if they go below 300.. and usually get weighed for statos at camp before bulking on another 30-40 lbs before kick off...
All athletes just different..
Are we in League 2 yet - Three seasons and we'll be away to Chesham
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests