Ashley Cole gets Mascherano sent off.

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Post by David Lee's Hair » Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:45 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 318443.stm

Kind of fits on here, but......

Pot
Kettle
Black

Spring to mind!

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:48 pm

SSN announces Maschereno admits the FA's charge of misconduct. This is a good thing, as it should stop any arguing about whether the Ref was right to send him off or not. No contest.

fatshaft
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2124
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:04 pm
Location: Aberdeen
Contact:

Post by fatshaft » Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:24 pm

David Lee's Hair wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 318443.stm

Kind of fits on here, but......

Pot
Kettle
Black

Spring to mind!
To be fair, as a manager he's not the type to get at the ref which is what he's saying.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Post by Tombwfc » Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:17 pm

Wasn't he complaining just the other week about how the refs didn't favour Sunderland with the big decisions?

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Sat Mar 29, 2008 12:06 pm

Mascherano commited a worse foul (against Gardner) in the first few minutes of our game

The weak ref didn't book him - pity as it could easily have changed the game

Campo, Nolan would have been carded before the player had hit the deck

So, its true

Refs in inconsistency and favouring the bigger club shocker

Fact is it aint often Liverpool are on the wrong end of the equation, so when it happens its an issue for the UN
Sto ut Serviam

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:17 pm

I suppose all these Reading players were booked today, then?

Image

No? Oh, you do surprise me.

CrazyHorse
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 10572
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
Location: Up above the streets and houses

Post by CrazyHorse » Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:44 pm

blurred wrote:I suppose all these Reading players were booked today, then?

Image

No? Oh, you do surprise me.
Couldn't give a flying fook about your one-man woe is me campaign.
Businesswoman of the year.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31626
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Sat Mar 29, 2008 6:57 pm

I agree that they should have been, if they raced 30 yards to repeatedly tell the ref to f*ck off.

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sat Mar 29, 2008 7:02 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I agree that they should have been, if they raced 30 yards to repeatedly tell the ref to f*ck off.
Absolutely. For all we know from that photo, old Battenburg might have actually called them together. He probably hasn't mind you, but you can't tell as to whether or not they're giving him some stick either.
May the bridges I burn light your way

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:15 pm

blurred wrote:I suppose all these Reading players were booked today, then?

Image

No? Oh, you do surprise me.
A law that only applies to cheating Scouse shitebag teams obviously. Never mind, eh? :wink:
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

WhiteArmy
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:47 am

Post by WhiteArmy » Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:14 pm

blurred wrote:I suppose all these Reading players were booked today, then?

Image

No? Oh, you do surprise me.
I'd have booked Warnock immediately for earwiggin' on Reading's team huddle.

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Sun Mar 30, 2008 9:57 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I agree that they should have been, if they raced 30 yards to repeatedly tell the ref to f*ck off.
Absolutely. For all we know from that photo, old Battenburg might have actually called them together. He probably hasn't mind you, but you can't tell as to whether or not they're giving him some stick either.
Come on Bruce, I realise you're talking tongue in cheek, but it's obvious what's going on.

David Lee's Hair
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2422
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Location: Cromwell Country

Post by David Lee's Hair » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:02 pm

What really happened........


http://www.duckyshack.co.uk/u/2503/f88580865.gif


maybe :nws:

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:42 pm

Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...

It's a farce.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31626
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:14 pm

blurred wrote:Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...

It's a farce.
I didn't see the incident. Did he say 'f*ck off' four times to the ref?

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:54 pm

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
blurred wrote:Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...

It's a farce.
I didn't see the incident. Did he say 'f*ck off' four times to the ref?
Irrelevant, as that's not what Mascherano got booked for.

communistworkethic
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7404
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: in your wife's dreams
Contact:

Post by communistworkethic » Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:50 am

blurred wrote:
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:
blurred wrote:Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...

It's a farce.
I didn't see the incident. Did he say 'f*ck off' four times to the ref?
Irrelevant, as that's not what Mascherano got booked for.
really? It had no part to play in the ref's decision?
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely

kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:16 am

communistworkethic wrote:really? It had no part to play in the ref's decision?
Unless he was sent off for persistent infringement, then it had no part in his second yellow, which was dissent. There's no such offence under the laws of the game as persistent dissent. I'm sure Bennett recalled the previous instances, but that's what makes what he got his second yellow for all the more laughable - he should have been carded earlier for more obvious and vehement dissent than what he was eventually booked for.

User avatar
Dave Sutton's barnet
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 31626
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
Contact:

Post by Dave Sutton's barnet » Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:20 am

So let me get this straight: he should have been carded earlier; he was carded for dissent; his multiple "f*ck off"s to the ref were irrelevant; you think in some way you've been hard done to.

Sorry blurred mate, but I give up. The conversation's insane.

blurred
Icon
Icon
Posts: 4001
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Liverpool

Post by blurred » Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:46 am

Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:So let me get this straight: he should have been carded earlier; he was carded for dissent; his multiple "f*ck off"s to the ref were irrelevant; you think in some way you've been hard done to.

Sorry blurred mate, but I give up. The conversation's insane.
If he'd been carded for telling the ref to feck off it'd've been entirely valid and nobody could complain. What he did get booked for was a joke, and if you book someone for that then you're issuing 10 cards a game up and down the country for dissent, which doesn't happen.

His multiple 'feck offs' were irrelevant, because there's no such thing as persistent dissent, unlike persistent infringement of the laws (which people are regularly carded for when they've made 3/4 fouls, none of which were severe enough to warrant a card, but you see the ref point to different areas of the pitch to indicate that he's being done for persistent infringement).

Should he have gone? Quite probably, yes (depending on whether he can use the 'Rooney' defence of screaming obscenities at referees with no punishment). Should he have gone for what he eventually got his second card for? No. That's the problem.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests