Ashley Cole gets Mascherano sent off.
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 318443.stm
Kind of fits on here, but......
Pot
Kettle
Black
Spring to mind!
Kind of fits on here, but......
Pot
Kettle
Black
Spring to mind!
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
To be fair, as a manager he's not the type to get at the ref which is what he's saying.David Lee's Hair wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 318443.stm
Kind of fits on here, but......
Pot
Kettle
Black
Spring to mind!
Mascherano commited a worse foul (against Gardner) in the first few minutes of our game
The weak ref didn't book him - pity as it could easily have changed the game
Campo, Nolan would have been carded before the player had hit the deck
So, its true
Refs in inconsistency and favouring the bigger club shocker
Fact is it aint often Liverpool are on the wrong end of the equation, so when it happens its an issue for the UN
The weak ref didn't book him - pity as it could easily have changed the game
Campo, Nolan would have been carded before the player had hit the deck
So, its true
Refs in inconsistency and favouring the bigger club shocker
Fact is it aint often Liverpool are on the wrong end of the equation, so when it happens its an issue for the UN
Sto ut Serviam
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 10572
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:51 pm
- Location: Up above the streets and houses
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31626
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Absolutely. For all we know from that photo, old Battenburg might have actually called them together. He probably hasn't mind you, but you can't tell as to whether or not they're giving him some stick either.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I agree that they should have been, if they raced 30 yards to repeatedly tell the ref to f*ck off.
May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Come on Bruce, I realise you're talking tongue in cheek, but it's obvious what's going on.Bruce Rioja wrote:Absolutely. For all we know from that photo, old Battenburg might have actually called them together. He probably hasn't mind you, but you can't tell as to whether or not they're giving him some stick either.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I agree that they should have been, if they raced 30 yards to repeatedly tell the ref to f*ck off.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2422
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 3:15 pm
- Location: Cromwell Country
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31626
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
Irrelevant, as that's not what Mascherano got booked for.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I didn't see the incident. Did he say 'f*ck off' four times to the ref?blurred wrote:Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...
It's a farce.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7404
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: in your wife's dreams
- Contact:
really? It had no part to play in the ref's decision?blurred wrote:Irrelevant, as that's not what Mascherano got booked for.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:I didn't see the incident. Did he say 'f*ck off' four times to the ref?blurred wrote:Did Mikel get booked for running after the ref and screaming at him for not giving a free-kick last night in the Everton game? Didn't think so, cos that's obviously not dissent...
It's a farce.
power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
kevin nolan is so fat, that when he sits around the house he sits around the house
Unless he was sent off for persistent infringement, then it had no part in his second yellow, which was dissent. There's no such offence under the laws of the game as persistent dissent. I'm sure Bennett recalled the previous instances, but that's what makes what he got his second yellow for all the more laughable - he should have been carded earlier for more obvious and vehement dissent than what he was eventually booked for.communistworkethic wrote:really? It had no part to play in the ref's decision?
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31626
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
If he'd been carded for telling the ref to feck off it'd've been entirely valid and nobody could complain. What he did get booked for was a joke, and if you book someone for that then you're issuing 10 cards a game up and down the country for dissent, which doesn't happen.Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:So let me get this straight: he should have been carded earlier; he was carded for dissent; his multiple "f*ck off"s to the ref were irrelevant; you think in some way you've been hard done to.
Sorry blurred mate, but I give up. The conversation's insane.
His multiple 'feck offs' were irrelevant, because there's no such thing as persistent dissent, unlike persistent infringement of the laws (which people are regularly carded for when they've made 3/4 fouls, none of which were severe enough to warrant a card, but you see the ref point to different areas of the pitch to indicate that he's being done for persistent infringement).
Should he have gone? Quite probably, yes (depending on whether he can use the 'Rooney' defence of screaming obscenities at referees with no punishment). Should he have gone for what he eventually got his second card for? No. That's the problem.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests