Whacko Jacko
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
There's rumours he was that out of it on scrips he thought he'd only signed up for ten. AT has it right though, his income was still phenomenal, yet he was spenidng $20mill more than he had cominh in per YEAR.H. Pedersen wrote:Given that Jackson was not in good enough physical condition to not die, I'm guessing the 50 concert series was a bridge too far . . .Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
When you get to my age, young fellow, and can't insure your life for more than the cost of a funeral the "worth more dead than alive" gap closes quite a bit. If I took an annuity (which I have not yet) I would actually be worth more alive as dying would cost the lot.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Well, unless you're 'in' on the autopsies then I guess you are indeed 'guessing'.H. Pedersen wrote:Given that Jackson was not in good enough physical condition to not die, I'm guessing the 50 concert series was a bridge too far . . .Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
That may be so, owd lad, but thebish, despite speaking with the wisdom of a thousand years, is nearer my age than yours. As was Michael Jackson.Montreal Wanderer wrote:When you get to my age, young fellow, and can't insure your life for more than the cost of a funeral the "worth more dead than alive" gap closes quite a bit. If I took an annuity (which I have not yet) I would actually be worth more alive as dying would cost the lot.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........
May the bridges I burn light your way
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Now I'm really depressed.Bruce Rioja wrote:That may be so, owd lad, but thebish, despite speaking with the wisdom of a thousand years, is nearer my age than yours. As was Michael Jackson.Montreal Wanderer wrote:When you get to my age, young fellow, and can't insure your life for more than the cost of a funeral the "worth more dead than alive" gap closes quite a bit. If I took an annuity (which I have not yet) I would actually be worth more alive as dying would cost the lot.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........

"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
This is quite true. He is/was apparently $500,000,000 in debt. It is thought with careful management and reduced spending, this debt will be cleared within two years after which the estate will be a goldmine. He died intestate. Doubtless the claims and custody suits will follow soon, and the lawyers will get rich. Indeed it might take more than two years to clear the debt with the sharks circling.americantrotter wrote:He solved his number one money problem: Himself. Can't spend when you're dead. Soon the debts will be paid off.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
sorry to break it to you Bruce - but the whole age-wisdom thing is a myth!! (Monty looked it up on snopes and in WikipaediaBruce Rioja wrote:That may be so, owd lad, but thebish, despite speaking with the wisdom of a thousand years, is nearer my age than yours. As was Michael Jackson.Montreal Wanderer wrote:When you get to my age, young fellow, and can't insure your life for more than the cost of a funeral the "worth more dead than alive" gap closes quite a bit. If I took an annuity (which I have not yet) I would actually be worth more alive as dying would cost the lot.Bruce Rioja wrote:Hang on. It's not as though he didn't have any work lined up. And I know for sure that I'm worth a 4ucksite more dead than I am alive. Aren't you?thebish wrote:not "ironic" - but "fishy" I'd say....Lord Kangana wrote:Strangely ironic that the guy was facing the very real prospect of bankruptcy, and two days after his death his royalties must be shooting through the roof. Bit of a p*sser that.
hmmmmmmm...........

maybe it would have saved a page of debate if I'd remembered to put some kind of a giveaway emoticon...

anyway - to answer the question - with the amount I get paid - I am worth quite a bit more dead than alive... (in purely financial terms anyway!) - and I don't have whacko's debts...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests