Tennis trivia question
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
Tennis trivia question
Theoretically, and assuming no walkovers/crippling injuries, what is the least number of shots (this includes serving) a player can make for them to win a grand slam event?
Last edited by Verbal on Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 15355
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
- Location: Vagantes numquam erramus
Is this a trick, like if I shot all the other entrants with a twelve bore I'd win by default? Now this gets complicated, cos you can off more than one person with a good shot....
Am I close?
Am I close?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.
Is that right?
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.
Is that right?
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
-
- Hopeful
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:49 pm
That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.
Is that right?
Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.
winner.Di Stefano wrote:That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.
Is that right?
Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Figured we'd be heading towards "none" somehow. How many times on your serve can you throw the ball in the air before the Umpire calls some sort of foul? If you kept missing it, then wouldn't there be some sort of disqualification that kicked in before the end of the match - we're talking Grand Slam here....Verbal wrote:winner.Di Stefano wrote:That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.
Is that right?
Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.

-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
- Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.
I beg to differ (well, I don't beg, I just will) - I googled this last night, in search of answer. And according toCAPSLOCK wrote:If you miss the ball, it isn't a fault
http://www.itftennis.com/abouttheitf/ru ... /rules.asp
(who you would expect to know these things), "16. The service....The server shall then release the ball by hand in any direction and hit the ball with the racket before the ball hits the ground. The service motion is completed at the moment the players racket hits or misses the ball"
And then, "19. Service fault. The service is a fault if a) The server breaks rules 16, 17 or 18".
Missing the ball breaks rule 16. Hence is a service fault.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 18 guests