Tennis trivia question

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Tennis trivia question

Post by Verbal » Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:57 pm

Theoretically, and assuming no walkovers/crippling injuries, what is the least number of shots (this includes serving) a player can make for them to win a grand slam event?
Last edited by Verbal on Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:00 pm

One match?

Male or female?

By my reckoning, a 5 set match is 36 shots

And I think its 7 matches at Wimbledon

So, 252?
Sto ut Serviam

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Post by Verbal » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:02 pm

As I said caps, minimum, so whatever that applies to best

And 252 is correct for the mens, though isn't the answer I'm looking for.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:08 pm

168 then?
Sto ut Serviam

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Post by Verbal » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:09 pm

nope :)
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:29 pm

I'll go for 84...

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Post by Verbal » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:32 pm

nope...
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:37 pm

Verbal wrote:nope...
Oops forgot - 56...?

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Post by Verbal » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:39 pm

nope...though I went through pretty much the exact same train of thought.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

Lord Kangana
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 15355
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:42 pm
Location: Vagantes numquam erramus

Post by Lord Kangana » Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:54 pm

Is this a trick, like if I shot all the other entrants with a twelve bore I'd win by default? Now this gets complicated, cos you can off more than one person with a good shot....

Am I close?
You can judge the whole world on the sparkle that you think it lacks.
Yes, you can stare into the abyss, but it's staring right back.

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Post by Puskas » Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:12 pm

It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.

Is that right?
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

wovlad
Promising
Promising
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 10:30 am
Location: Underneath the squeaky floorboard, behind the kitchen dresser

Post by wovlad » Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:37 pm

Nil shots because of a combination of byes, walkovers, coin toss & forfits.
If I should die, think only this of me:
That there's some corner of a foreign field
That is for ever England

malcd1
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3608
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:33 pm

Post by malcd1 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:14 pm

I can't be bothered to work it out but you haven't said anything about a singles match or if it is the amount of shots just one player hits the ball not all players. If it is a doubles match will a player hit the ball half the amount of times.

As in 6-0, 6-0, 6-0.

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13654
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:17 pm

One

Di Stefano
Hopeful
Hopeful
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:49 pm

Post by Di Stefano » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:25 pm

Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.

Is that right?
That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.

Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.

Verbal
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Silly London

Post by Verbal » Wed Nov 11, 2009 3:56 am

Di Stefano wrote:
Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.

Is that right?
That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.

Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.
winner.
"Young people, nowadays, imagine money is everything."

"Yes, and when they grow older they know it."

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:45 am

Verbal wrote:
Di Stefano wrote:
Puskas wrote:It's got to involve missing most of your serves, hence gifting the points to your opponent, but them doing something similar. Hence you each win the other's game, without making a shot.
It then comes down to the minimum number of shots you need to win a set - presumably 2 to win the tie break. So that's 4 to win a 3 set match (7-6,7-6). Times 7 for the rounds, and you have 28.

Is that right?
That depends who was serving first. Serve changes round at the end of each set if they all go to a tie break so some sets you'd have to win 2 points, others just the one.

Anyhow, the answer's 0. Doubles, and you're playing with somebody really good who wins all the points for the pair, and the opponents double fault at you all the time. And you miss the ball each time you throw it in the air.
winner.
Figured we'd be heading towards "none" somehow. How many times on your serve can you throw the ball in the air before the Umpire calls some sort of foul? If you kept missing it, then wouldn't there be some sort of disqualification that kicked in before the end of the match - we're talking Grand Slam here.... :-)

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:42 am

If you miss the ball, it isn't a fault
Sto ut Serviam

Puskas
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2125
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:49 pm
Location: Home. Home, again. I like to be here when I can.

Post by Puskas » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:53 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:If you miss the ball, it isn't a fault
I beg to differ (well, I don't beg, I just will) - I googled this last night, in search of answer. And according to
http://www.itftennis.com/abouttheitf/ru ... /rules.asp
(who you would expect to know these things), "16. The service....The server shall then release the ball by hand in any direction and hit the ball with the racket before the ball hits the ground. The service motion is completed at the moment the players racket hits or misses the ball"
And then, "19. Service fault. The service is a fault if a) The server breaks rules 16, 17 or 18".

Missing the ball breaks rule 16. Hence is a service fault.
"People are crazy and times are strange
I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
I used to care, but things have changed"

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:01 am

Fair enough

I was actually open to contradiction by way of it being called a foot fault.......



I'd still argue the answer though, as the question says 'shots'

If you try to hit the ball, you've played a shot
Sto ut Serviam

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 14 guests