Portsmouth AGAIN

There ARE other teams(we'd have no-one to play otherwise) and here's where all-comers can discuss the wider world of football......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Sat Mar 06, 2010 1:12 pm

Anybody watching the game will have noticed that the scrolling pitchside acvertising boards are adverstising UHY-Hacker Young..... The administrators. Surely that's a little disrespectful to the paying fans
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:53 pm

85 reducies announced today amongst club staff, some on as little as £15K a year. Out of all the players, the Admistrator announced today, only two offered to take a pay cut to try and help stop this from happening.

The wedge between player and supporter takes a hard knock once again! :whack:
May the bridges I burn light your way

superjohnmcginlay
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3057
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm

Post by superjohnmcginlay » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:38 am

Yeah but Cheif Exec Storrie agreed a 40% pay cut and is now only on 10 grand a week. Poor fella.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:45 am

superjohnmcginlay wrote:Yeah but Cheif Exec Storrie agreed a 40% pay cut and is now only on 10 grand a week. Poor fella.
How he is still there and getting paid really is beyond me. He's partially and probably quite significantly responsible for the position their in.


Disgraceful really.

superjohnmcginlay
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3057
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:21 pm

Post by superjohnmcginlay » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:54 am

Isn't he on a tax evasion charge with ol' saggy chops n'all?

H. Pedersen
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Post by H. Pedersen » Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:14 am

Bruce Rioja wrote:85 reducies announced today amongst club staff, some on as little as £15K a year. Out of all the players, the Admistrator announced today, only two offered to take a pay cut to try and help stop this from happening.

The wedge between player and supporter takes a hard knock once again! :whack:
Any guesses? David James shouldn't be hurting for cash after all these years.

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:43 am

Loss to Birmingham helps us but they may still go out of business if the Tax men win their case against the administration decision.
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

as
Reliable
Reliable
Posts: 973
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:28 pm

Post by as » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:00 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:Yeah but Cheif Exec Storrie agreed a 40% pay cut and is now only on 10 grand a week. Poor fella.
How he is still there and getting paid really is beyond me. He's partially and probably quite significantly responsible for the position their in.


Disgraceful really.
Him and Risdale belong in government, they're naturals!

85 lose their jobs, and Storrie is still there, not to mention that annoying administrator bloke loving the limelight (it's a matter of time before that tool gets his own reality telly show).
Troll and proud of it.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:00 pm

as wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
superjohnmcginlay wrote:Yeah but Cheif Exec Storrie agreed a 40% pay cut and is now only on 10 grand a week. Poor fella.
How he is still there and getting paid really is beyond me. He's partially and probably quite significantly responsible for the position their in.


Disgraceful really.
Him and Risdale belong in government, they're naturals!

85 lose their jobs, and Storrie is still there, not to mention that annoying administrator bloke loving the limelight (it's a matter of time before that tool gets his own reality telly show).
Aye whats all that about? I've noticed him on telly more than bloody Avram Grant. He's an administrator for fooks sake, a bean counter, not someone who should be getting attention. [/b]

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:07 pm

H. Pedersen wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:85 reducies announced today amongst club staff, some on as little as £15K a year. Out of all the players, the Admistrator announced today, only two offered to take a pay cut to try and help stop this from happening.

The wedge between player and supporter takes a hard knock once again! :whack:
Any guesses? David James shouldn't be hurting for cash after all these years.
The guy wouldn't say, but James was first that came to my mind. He also comes across as being a really decent fella.

Just think, the combined annual salries of the now jobless probably comes out fairly close to the sum that Sol Campbell's got his cap in the ring for! We all really do need to stop and think about that for a moment!
May the bridges I burn light your way

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:45 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8570134.stm

HMRC have dropped their petition to wind-up Pompey, which I guess means our 3 points are safe. :-)

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:57 pm

Worthy4England wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8570134.stm

HMRC have dropped their petition to wind-up Pompey, which I guess means our 3 points are safe. :-)
But when do they lose their 9 points?
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34731
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:04 pm

FaninOz wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8570134.stm

HMRC have dropped their petition to wind-up Pompey, which I guess means our 3 points are safe. :-)
But when do they lose their 9 points?
I guess in part, they've been waiting on the outcome of this - had it gone ahead and HMRC were given permission to wind up the Company, then there would have been 19 points to lose and a lot of rejigging of everyone's points tally. If they now have clarity that they can operate until the end of the season, then I guess they could lose them any time now.

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:14 pm

9 points gone now, until they appeal of course!
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

FaninOz
Dedicated
Dedicated
Posts: 1444
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:24 pm
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Post by FaninOz » Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:55 am

What a pity that the man in the street, 85 of them in fact, are bearing the immediate brunt of the Portsmouth problem whilst the players are giving up nothing and all the loan players are also still at Portsmouth.

Surely the administrater is within his rights to cut 20% from all players irrespective of their contracts and could send all the loans home! Not sure of the law under administration but when I was in bussiness in the UK and employed a lot of people on contract we had the right to amend and terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances, which administration is.

Again another example of players being totally insensitive to their club and their supporters situation, they should be volunteering to take a pay cut!
Depression is just a state of mind, supporting Bolton is also a state of mind hence supporting Bolton must be depressing QED

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:04 am

Don't blame the players. It just reaffirms the piss poor management within the game - and the administrator's failings too.
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:16 pm

FaninOz wrote:What a pity that the man in the street, 85 of them in fact, are bearing the immediate brunt of the Portsmouth problem whilst the players are giving up nothing and all the loan players are also still at Portsmouth.

Surely the administrater is within his rights to cut 20% from all players irrespective of their contracts and could send all the loans home! Not sure of the law under administration but when I was in bussiness in the UK and employed a lot of people on contract we had the right to amend and terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances, which administration is.

Again another example of players being totally insensitive to their club and their supporters situation, they should be volunteering to take a pay cut!
Would you take a pay cut to save somebody elses job? Not sure if I would
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

User avatar
Hoboh
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 13656
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 8:19 am

Post by Hoboh » Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:18 pm

boltonboris wrote:
FaninOz wrote:What a pity that the man in the street, 85 of them in fact, are bearing the immediate brunt of the Portsmouth problem whilst the players are giving up nothing and all the loan players are also still at Portsmouth.

Surely the administrater is within his rights to cut 20% from all players irrespective of their contracts and could send all the loans home! Not sure of the law under administration but when I was in bussiness in the UK and employed a lot of people on contract we had the right to amend and terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances, which administration is.

Again another example of players being totally insensitive to their club and their supporters situation, they should be volunteering to take a pay cut!
Would you take a pay cut to save somebody elses job? Not sure if I would
The fit blonde out the office next door???? :mrgreen:

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38820
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:23 pm

FaninOz wrote:What a pity that the man in the street, 85 of them in fact, are bearing the immediate brunt of the Portsmouth problem whilst the players are giving up nothing and all the loan players are also still at Portsmouth.

Surely the administrater is within his rights to cut 20% from all players irrespective of their contracts and could send all the loans home! Not sure of the law under administration but when I was in bussiness in the UK and employed a lot of people on contract we had the right to amend and terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances, which administration is.

Again another example of players being totally insensitive to their club and their supporters situation, they should be volunteering to take a pay cut!
2 things

1) The players are actually assets to PFC as they can sell them in some cases for considerable money. So they won't want to risk dicking around with their contracts and leaving themselves open to players being able to walk away for nowt at the end of the season.

2) The staff they released are people who the club can continue running without. They can't without players.

As for loan players I believe they should have been FORCED to send them back as soon as they went into admin by the premier league and the FA. But that reflects on the way the game is governed really.

boltonboris
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 14515
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm

Post by boltonboris » Fri Mar 19, 2010 12:26 pm

Hobinho wrote:
boltonboris wrote:
FaninOz wrote:What a pity that the man in the street, 85 of them in fact, are bearing the immediate brunt of the Portsmouth problem whilst the players are giving up nothing and all the loan players are also still at Portsmouth.

Surely the administrater is within his rights to cut 20% from all players irrespective of their contracts and could send all the loans home! Not sure of the law under administration but when I was in bussiness in the UK and employed a lot of people on contract we had the right to amend and terminate contracts in exceptional circumstances, which administration is.

Again another example of players being totally insensitive to their club and their supporters situation, they should be volunteering to take a pay cut!
Would you take a pay cut to save somebody elses job? Not sure if I would
The fit blonde out the office next door???? :mrgreen:
Nope, the fat gobshite who's always up her supervisors' back-side.... Next door but one!
"I've got the ball now. It's a bit worn, but I've got it"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests