The Great Art Debate
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Ha, excellent!William the White wrote:changed my mind about Vettriano about ten seconds ago...
The headline of this article in the Times says it for me: "Fame, wealth and fast women: where did Vettriano go wrong?"
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 077899.ece
So yes, a big part of my admiration for Vettriano lies in the fact that he somehow manages to make (a lot of) money by getting women to come and hang around in their skimpies.... long live the market!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Money bit we understand... We all like, some more than others... And some might even be jealous...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Ha, excellent!William the White wrote:changed my mind about Vettriano about ten seconds ago...
The headline of this article in the Times says it for me: "Fame, wealth and fast women: where did Vettriano go wrong?"
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 077899.ece
So yes, a big part of my admiration for Vettriano lies in the fact that he somehow manages to make (a lot of) money by getting women to come and hang around in their skimpies.... long live the market!
[Looks round at empty spaces where women in skimpies should be, and, somehow aren't...]
Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit...

-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
I really don't understand people who make the argument in this way.... a little bit like people who dislike golf and choose to express this by denying its status as a sport.William the White wrote: Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit...
No, I genuinely like his work. I agree there's not much to think about, but I think there's room for a bit of that in everyone's taste range.
Who knows, perhaps his femmes fatales just tap into my fetishes and my tastes will mature... though I doubt it.

Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:I really don't understand people who make the argument in this way.... a little bit like people who dislike golf and choose to express this by denying its status as a sport.William the White wrote: Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit...
No, I genuinely like his work. I agree there's not much to think about, but I think there's room for a bit of that in everyone's taste range.
Who knows, perhaps his femmes fatales just tap into my fetishes and my tastes will mature... though I doubt it.
and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...
but the femmes fatales are very tasty...

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune. 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
and an appointment for the optician in their pocket...TANGODANCER wrote:It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune.

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
I know. I think I'm too old for redemtion now though. I should have learned not to feel good about the joyful light-hearted things in life and taken a course on " piles of bricks and unmade bed appreciation" years ago. Too late now.William the White wrote:and an appointment for the optician in their pocket...TANGODANCER wrote:It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune.

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
William the White wrote:
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...
and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...
but the femmes fatales are very tasty...
I suspect this is always a circular argument - whether something IS art or IS literature or IS a sport - because, ultimately, it depends on how you choose to define the words "art", "literature" or "sport" - essentially a semantic discussion. If the two (or three) protagonists choose different definitions - then there's not much more to it than "yes it is" or "no it isn't". That's why I think it was slightly more interesting (though others might disagree) when we were discussing what we considered to be "great" art - because that involves a little more revelation about what makes us tick than a mere semantic discussion might prompt.
there are definitions of art that would include vetrianno
there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
there are definitions of sport that would include golf
to Wenger's chagrin there are definitions of "football" that would include Bolton!
but that doesn't really get us anywhere - it's pure semantics...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
The point I was making really... given the circularity of the argument, I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff... He'll never convince me that Vettriano is any more engaging than the slow drying of paint on saccharine... when you are that far apart it can never be anything more than the odd quip... which I quite enjoy, and, judging by the regularity of his response, so does he...thebish wrote:William the White wrote:
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...
and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...
but the femmes fatales are very tasty...
I suspect this is always a circular argument - whether something IS art or IS literature or IS a sport - because, ultimately, it depends on how you choose to define the words "art", "literature" or "sport" - essentially a semantic discussion. If the two (or three) protagonists choose different definitions - then there's not much more to it than "yes it is" or "no it isn't". That's why I think it was slightly more interesting (though others might disagree) when we were discussing what we considered to be "great" art - because that involves a little more revelation about what makes us tick than a mere semantic discussion might prompt.
there are definitions of art that would include vetrianno
there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
there are definitions of sport that would include golf
to Wenger's chagrin there are definitions of "football" that would include Bolton!
but that doesn't really get us anywhere - it's pure semantics...
I'm quite happy to recognise his literary appreciation of Lorca, Marquez and Neruda, and suspect he will not be round to shout the superior virtues of Mills and Boon anytime soon... Hence my last quip, even tho in a response to mummy...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...Bruce Rioja wrote:Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonderWilliam the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff.......
NEXT, PLEASE...

- TANGODANCER
- Immortal
- Posts: 44175
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
- Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.
Everyone has the right to define what delights them and invokes pleasure. The Chairman of the Royal Academy of Art knows no more about what Joe Bloggs finds pleasure in than anyone else. He just thinks he does. A bit like a multi-billionaire buying a masterpiece just so he can get one up on his fellow millionaires. At least the things that please me are on my walls for all to see, not locked up in an underground vault with built-in death rays guarding it. IMO there's more bullshxt talked about art than politics....and that's saying something. The rules on both are usually made by the very rich and graded downwards accordingly. Bellini sculptures for the gentry, plaster ducks for the working class. Form an orderly queue there please. 

Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
You noticed too!!!TANGODANCER wrote:Everyone has the right to define what delights them and invokes pleasure. The Chairman of the Royal Academy of Art knows no more about what Joe Bloggs finds pleasure in than anyone else. He just thinks he does. A bit like a multi-billionaire buying a masterpiece just so he can get one up on his fellow millionaires. At least the things that please me are on my walls for all to see, not locked up in an underground vault with built-in death rays guarding it. IMO there's more bullshxt talked about art than politics....and that's saying something. The rules on both are usually made by the very rich and graded downwards accordingly. Bellini sculptures for the gentry, plaster ducks for the working class. Form an orderly queue there please.

- Bruce Rioja
- Immortal
- Posts: 38742
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
- Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.
Oh I love puzzling, challenging stuff. Perhaps it's best if I let you know if Tracy Emin ever comes up with any.William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...Bruce Rioja wrote:Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonderWilliam the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff.......
NEXT, PLEASE...

May the bridges I burn light your way
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
Are all science graduates happy with the banal?thebish wrote:literature = "stories written in book form."William the White wrote:Ok - tell me one...thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon

No need to reply - I know what you'll say - and it is definitely my fault for asking...
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
By all means, no point in me returning the favour given the total failure so far...Bruce Rioja wrote:Oh I love puzzling, challenging stuff. Perhaps it's best if I let you know if Tracy Emin ever comes up with any.William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...Bruce Rioja wrote:Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonderWilliam the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff.......
NEXT, PLEASE...

William the White wrote:Are all science graduates happy with the banal?thebish wrote:literature = "stories written in book form."William the White wrote:Ok - tell me one...thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon![]()
No need to reply - I know what you'll say - and it is definitely my fault for asking...
you didn't ask for a definition I was happy with - you just asked for a definition that would include mills & boon! You and I would probably dispute that definition (but others wouldn't) - which was entirely my point - that arguing over definitions is simply semantics, and if people debate using different definitions of the terms being debated - then they are not really debating at all - but talking at cross-purposes.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests