The Great Art Debate

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Thu Apr 01, 2010 12:26 pm

changed my mind about Vettriano about ten seconds ago... :wink:

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:00 am

William the White wrote:changed my mind about Vettriano about ten seconds ago... :wink:
Ha, excellent!

The headline of this article in the Times says it for me: "Fame, wealth and fast women: where did Vettriano go wrong?"

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 077899.ece

So yes, a big part of my admiration for Vettriano lies in the fact that he somehow manages to make (a lot of) money by getting women to come and hang around in their skimpies.... long live the market!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:21 am

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote:changed my mind about Vettriano about ten seconds ago... :wink:
Ha, excellent!

The headline of this article in the Times says it for me: "Fame, wealth and fast women: where did Vettriano go wrong?"

http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 077899.ece

So yes, a big part of my admiration for Vettriano lies in the fact that he somehow manages to make (a lot of) money by getting women to come and hang around in their skimpies.... long live the market!
Money bit we understand... We all like, some more than others... And some might even be jealous...

[Looks round at empty spaces where women in skimpies should be, and, somehow aren't...]

Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit... :wink:

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Sat Apr 03, 2010 4:52 am

William the White wrote: Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit... :wink:
I really don't understand people who make the argument in this way.... a little bit like people who dislike golf and choose to express this by denying its status as a sport.

No, I genuinely like his work. I agree there's not much to think about, but I think there's room for a bit of that in everyone's taste range.

Who knows, perhaps his femmes fatales just tap into my fetishes and my tastes will mature... though I doubt it.

Image
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:04 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
William the White wrote: Good luck to him, obviously, but he isn't any kind of artist... And you and i both know it, don't we? He really is shit... :wink:
I really don't understand people who make the argument in this way.... a little bit like people who dislike golf and choose to express this by denying its status as a sport.

No, I genuinely like his work. I agree there's not much to think about, but I think there's room for a bit of that in everyone's taste range.

Who knows, perhaps his femmes fatales just tap into my fetishes and my tastes will mature... though I doubt it.

Image
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...

and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...

but the femmes fatales are very tasty... :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:24 pm

It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune. :mrgreen:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:31 am

TANGODANCER wrote:It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune. :mrgreen:
and an appointment for the optician in their pocket... :mrgreen:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:44 pm

William the White wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:It might just be that the Singing Butler works of Vetriano appeal to people with a sense of romanticism in their souls. Sort of sensual as opposed to the blatanly sexual. Takes all sorts to make an art gallery. If Emin and co can get in there some of Walt Disneys illustrators could make a fortune. :mrgreen:
and an appointment for the optician in their pocket... :mrgreen:
I know. I think I'm too old for redemtion now though. I should have learned not to feel good about the joyful light-hearted things in life and taken a course on " piles of bricks and unmade bed appreciation" years ago. Too late now. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:33 pm

William the White wrote:
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...

and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...

but the femmes fatales are very tasty... :wink:

I suspect this is always a circular argument - whether something IS art or IS literature or IS a sport - because, ultimately, it depends on how you choose to define the words "art", "literature" or "sport" - essentially a semantic discussion. If the two (or three) protagonists choose different definitions - then there's not much more to it than "yes it is" or "no it isn't". That's why I think it was slightly more interesting (though others might disagree) when we were discussing what we considered to be "great" art - because that involves a little more revelation about what makes us tick than a mere semantic discussion might prompt.

there are definitions of art that would include vetrianno
there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
there are definitions of sport that would include golf
to Wenger's chagrin there are definitions of "football" that would include Bolton!

but that doesn't really get us anywhere - it's pure semantics...

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:56 pm

thebish wrote:
William the White wrote:
you've shown plenty of good taste in a lot of your offerings on here, I reckon...

and vettriano is an artist if mills and boon novels are literature...

but the femmes fatales are very tasty... :wink:

I suspect this is always a circular argument - whether something IS art or IS literature or IS a sport - because, ultimately, it depends on how you choose to define the words "art", "literature" or "sport" - essentially a semantic discussion. If the two (or three) protagonists choose different definitions - then there's not much more to it than "yes it is" or "no it isn't". That's why I think it was slightly more interesting (though others might disagree) when we were discussing what we considered to be "great" art - because that involves a little more revelation about what makes us tick than a mere semantic discussion might prompt.

there are definitions of art that would include vetrianno
there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
there are definitions of sport that would include golf
to Wenger's chagrin there are definitions of "football" that would include Bolton!

but that doesn't really get us anywhere - it's pure semantics...
The point I was making really... given the circularity of the argument, I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff... He'll never convince me that Vettriano is any more engaging than the slow drying of paint on saccharine... when you are that far apart it can never be anything more than the odd quip... which I quite enjoy, and, judging by the regularity of his response, so does he...

I'm quite happy to recognise his literary appreciation of Lorca, Marquez and Neruda, and suspect he will not be round to shout the superior virtues of Mills and Boon anytime soon... Hence my last quip, even tho in a response to mummy...

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:59 pm

thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
Ok - tell me one...

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:10 pm

William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff......
Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonder :wink: .
May the bridges I burn light your way

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:36 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff......
Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonder :wink: .
I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...

NEXT, PLEASE... :wink:

User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:23 pm

Everyone has the right to define what delights them and invokes pleasure. The Chairman of the Royal Academy of Art knows no more about what Joe Bloggs finds pleasure in than anyone else. He just thinks he does. A bit like a multi-billionaire buying a masterpiece just so he can get one up on his fellow millionaires. At least the things that please me are on my walls for all to see, not locked up in an underground vault with built-in death rays guarding it. IMO there's more bullshxt talked about art than politics....and that's saying something. The rules on both are usually made by the very rich and graded downwards accordingly. Bellini sculptures for the gentry, plaster ducks for the working class. Form an orderly queue there please. :wink:
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:16 pm

TANGODANCER wrote:Everyone has the right to define what delights them and invokes pleasure. The Chairman of the Royal Academy of Art knows no more about what Joe Bloggs finds pleasure in than anyone else. He just thinks he does. A bit like a multi-billionaire buying a masterpiece just so he can get one up on his fellow millionaires. At least the things that please me are on my walls for all to see, not locked up in an underground vault with built-in death rays guarding it. IMO there's more bullshxt talked about art than politics....and that's saying something. The rules on both are usually made by the very rich and graded downwards accordingly. Bellini sculptures for the gentry, plaster ducks for the working class. Form an orderly queue there please. :wink:
You noticed too!!! :wink:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:35 pm

William the White wrote:
thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
Ok - tell me one...
literature = "stories written in book form."

User avatar
Bruce Rioja
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38742
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: Drifting into the arena of the unwell.

Post by Bruce Rioja » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:39 pm

William the White wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff......
Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonder :wink: .
I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...

NEXT, PLEASE... :wink:
Oh I love puzzling, challenging stuff. Perhaps it's best if I let you know if Tracy Emin ever comes up with any. :wink:
May the bridges I burn light your way

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:39 pm

thebish wrote:
William the White wrote:
thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
Ok - tell me one...
literature = "stories written in book form."
Are all science graduates happy with the banal? :conf:

No need to reply - I know what you'll say - and it is definitely my fault for asking...

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:41 pm

Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:
Bruce Rioja wrote:
William the White wrote:I know I'll never convince Tango that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff......
Or being had for an Emporers-new-clothes type mug, I shouldn't wonder :wink: .
I know I'll never convince Bruce Rioja that Emin is a significant artist - he doesn't like that puzzling, challenging stuff...

NEXT, PLEASE... :wink:
Oh I love puzzling, challenging stuff. Perhaps it's best if I let you know if Tracy Emin ever comes up with any. :wink:
By all means, no point in me returning the favour given the total failure so far... :wink:

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:43 pm

William the White wrote:
thebish wrote:
William the White wrote:
thebish wrote: there are definitions of literature that would include mills & boon
Ok - tell me one...
literature = "stories written in book form."
Are all science graduates happy with the banal? :conf:

No need to reply - I know what you'll say - and it is definitely my fault for asking...

you didn't ask for a definition I was happy with - you just asked for a definition that would include mills & boon! You and I would probably dispute that definition (but others wouldn't) - which was entirely my point - that arguing over definitions is simply semantics, and if people debate using different definitions of the terms being debated - then they are not really debating at all - but talking at cross-purposes.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests