Today I'm angry about.....

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply
User avatar
TANGODANCER
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 44175
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: Between the Bible, Regency and the Rubaiyat and forever trying to light penny candles from stars.

Post by TANGODANCER » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:38 pm

Puskas wrote:
TANGODANCER wrote:Our mutt now apparently suffers from hay fever. :shock:

Quick visit o the vets, injection, tablets and a quick check: "That'll be eighty pounds sir!" I want to be a vet. :(
Are you sure you want to be, though?

Wouldn't it mean you spend all your time wandering about in a sullen daze, suffering flashbacks to your time in 'Nam?

Then, at some point, you may get involved in an ill-coceived attempt to go on an undercover mission to rescue former comrades who are MIA and still held prisoner there.

I'm not sure I'd want that.
Hey, I'm talking " All creatures great and small", not blxxdy Rambo. :D
Si Deus pro nobis, quis contra nos?

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:38 pm

All the whining about the nightmare those poor Liverpool players have had...

can you IMAGINE how tough it must have been to travel first class train and luxury coach??

jimbo
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3248
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:34 am

Post by jimbo » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:18 am

thebish wrote:All the whining about the nightmare those poor Liverpool players have had...

can you IMAGINE how tough it must have been to travel first class train and luxury coach??
You see, the thing that gets me with this is that Fulham had an equally long journey to get to Hamburg. Toulouse RL spent 25 hours on the road last week rocking up at St Helens a full 2 hours before kick off. Them there scousers have nothing to moan about.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:20 am

jimbo wrote:
thebish wrote:All the whining about the nightmare those poor Liverpool players have had...

can you IMAGINE how tough it must have been to travel first class train and luxury coach??
You see, the thing that gets me with this is that Fulham had an equally long journey to get to Hamburg. Toulouse RL spent 25 hours on the road last week rocking up at St Helens a full 2 hours before kick off. Them there scousers have nothing to moan about.
There are bunches of flowers piling up outside Lime Street as we speak.
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:29 am

Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.

General Mannerheim
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6343
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 12:45 pm

Post by General Mannerheim » Fri Apr 23, 2010 10:57 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
it was very OTT, almost American like! (bristol debate)

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:10 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Sto ut Serviam

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:28 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Last edited by BWFC_Insane on Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:29 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!
The BBC?

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:31 am

Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!
The BBC?
Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:33 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!
The BBC?
Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?
They all have agendas. All of them. The BBC are not independent. At all.

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:36 am

Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote: We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!
The BBC?
Yes or would you prefer Fox *cough* sorry Sky News?
They all have agendas. All of them. The BBC are not independent. At all.
They are in the fact they are funded by the TV licence as opposed to Murdoch. When you watch Sky or many of the American news channels you realise how lucky we are to have an independent news service such as the BBC.

I'm still waiting for someone to tell me which party the BBC are supposedly favouring this election!

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:40 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Insane ... are you mad ??

Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?

Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.

Really, really, do you not see it ?

Wow !!
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:43 am

bobo the clown wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Insane ... are you mad ??

Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?

Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.

Really, really, do you not see it ?

Wow !!
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.

Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:55 am

BWFC_Insane wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Sky. For their ridiculously biased and moronic coverage of the election.
We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Insane ... are you mad ??

Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?

Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.

Really, really, do you not see it ?

Wow !!
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.

Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.

Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:59 am

Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.
Then we may just have to agree that my view irrates you and yours amazes me.

l&k's xxxx
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:01 pm

Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:We need something to balance the BBC
Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Insane ... are you mad ??

Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?

Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.

Really, really, do you not see it ?

Wow !!
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.

Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.

Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.
So what you're saying is anyone who is paid cannot be independent?

Thats just nonsense. The BBC have charters and rules governing their independence.

They aren't owned by one bloke who tells them which way to slant their coverage. The BBC are actually paid for by us. We pay the licence fee. And they have a charter to promise that they will report things "independently".

Are they perfect? No. But find me a better news outlet!

User avatar
BWFC_Insane
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 38830
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:07 pm

Post by BWFC_Insane » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:02 pm

bobo the clown wrote:
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.
Then we may just have to agree that my view irrates you and yours amazes me.

l&k's xxxx
You still haven't told me why this supposedly "labour" biased BBC would have Nick Robinson as their chief political editor!

bobo the clown
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 19597
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:49 am
Location: N Wales, but close enough to Chester I can pretend I'm in England
Contact:

Post by bobo the clown » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:15 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.
Then we may just have to agree that my view irrates you and yours amazes me.

l&k's xxxx
You still haven't told me why this supposedly "labour" biased BBC would have Nick Robinson as their chief political editor!
Go over all the other senior journo's & producers over the past 15 years & the depths of New Labourism they have evidenced. It vastly outweighs anything this one guy can be achieving.

It's the fact that you, very obviously, just simply don't see this at all which I find amazing.

Or maybe I just prefer to irritate you ! :pissed:
Not advocating mass-murder as an entirely positive experience, of course, but it had its moments.
"I understand you are a very good footballer" ... "I try".

User avatar
Gary the Enfield
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8610
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Enfield

Post by Gary the Enfield » Fri Apr 23, 2010 12:20 pm

BWFC_Insane wrote:
Gary the Enfield wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:
bobo the clown wrote:
BWFC_Insane wrote:Yes indeed. We need a balance to those pesky independent broadcasters!

And I'd love to hear who the BBC are supposedly biased towards, can't wait for this!
Insane ... are you mad ??

Do you really not see the 'new-Labour' agenda of the BEEB over the past 15 years ? Really ?

Half of their employees are card carrying members, a staggering proportion of ther news teams are married to/partners members of the Labour machine. They see their role as being at the vangaurd of over-the-top environmentalism, political correctness and forced diversity.

Really, really, do you not see it ?

Wow !!
Thats just the sort of shite that folk spout that irritates me.

Take a look at the biography of the BBC's chief political editor, who is providing the majority of their political coverage and comment over the course of this election!
I don't see how something that is funded by the state can possibly declare itself independent.

Perhaps it's all part of the cost cutting of recent years and they actually mean interdependent.
So what you're saying is anyone who is paid cannot be independent?

Thats just nonsense. The BBC have charters and rules governing their independence.

They aren't owned by one bloke who tells them which way to slant their coverage. The BBC are actually paid for by us. We pay the licence fee. And they have a charter to promise that they will report things "independently".

Are they perfect? No. But find me a better news outlet!
BWFC had a customers charter stating that, amongst other things, new Home kits would be produced every two seasons. Don't be so bloody naive. :wink:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests