The Politics Thread

If you have a life outside of BWFC, then this is the place to tell us all about your toilet habits, and those bizarre fetishes.......

Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em

Post Reply

Who will you be voting for?

Labour
13
41%
Conservatives
12
38%
Liberal Democrats
2
6%
UK Independence Party (UKIP)
0
No votes
Green Party
3
9%
Plaid Cymru
0
No votes
Other
1
3%
Planet Hobo
1
3%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34747
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed May 12, 2010 10:28 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?

What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.

Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?

Fairly standard stuff.

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34747
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed May 12, 2010 10:29 am

thebish wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?

What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
who knows? but - it was no more than a couple of hours after the news broke that the lib dems were talking to labour that the tories (through Hague) stood on the steps and publically made a raft of "extra mile" promises that (presumably) they hadn't made when they thought it was just them talking to Nick.

Labour would NEVER have held together the ramshackle alliance that was being suggested with their back benches of perpetual dusgruntlement - their negotiating team are clever enough to have realised that from day one.

anyway... lots of people ringing R5 to say they are joining the labour party (mostly ex lib dems)
That's the one.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 am

Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?

What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.

Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?

Fairly standard stuff.
So, Labour knew they couldn't hold a coalition together, but the Tories aren't as bright as Labour (or the rest of the country) so they were put under pressure

No, not having it

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34747
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed May 12, 2010 11:02 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:
Worthy4England wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?

What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.

Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?

Fairly standard stuff.
So, Labour knew they couldn't hold a coalition together, but the Tories aren't as bright as Labour (or the rest of the country) so they were put under pressure

No, not having it
Your pick.

Can't see any other reason why it would have been done.

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Wed May 12, 2010 11:06 am

Exactly :)

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34747
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed May 12, 2010 11:08 am

CAPSLOCK wrote:Exactly :)
So the only reason I keep coming back to, was to try and maintain pressure on the Con/Lib deal...

Some of the younger Notting Hill Mob might have been marginally influenced by it, I doubt the older heads will have been much swayed.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed May 12, 2010 11:50 am

Theresa May as Home Secretary...

and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...

User avatar
Worthy4England
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 34747
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm

Post by Worthy4England » Wed May 12, 2010 11:53 am

thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...

and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
So the inclusion of Theresa May alters this, how?

William the White
Legend
Legend
Posts: 8454
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Trotter Shop

Post by William the White » Wed May 12, 2010 11:57 am

thebish wrote:
CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?

What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
who knows? but - it was no more than a couple of hours after the news broke that the lib dems were talking to labour that the tories (through Hague) stood on the steps and publically made a raft of "extra mile" promises that (presumably) they hadn't made when they thought it was just them talking to Nick.

Labour would NEVER have held together the ramshackle alliance that was being suggested with their back benches of perpetual dusgruntlement - their negotiating team are clever enough to have realised that from day one.

anyway... lots of people ringing R5 to say they are joining the labour party (mostly ex lib dems)[/quote]

How long before the first defection by a Lib MP?

How long before the second?

And roll on the split. In any by-election there will be a Liberal candidate - even if not endorsed by Clegg.

Zulus Thousand of em
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5043
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
Location: 200 miles darn sarf

Post by Zulus Thousand of em » Wed May 12, 2010 12:11 pm

fatshaft wrote:
Zulus Thousand of em wrote:In all this sorry mess, and a hung parliament is always a sorry mess irrespective of your political standpoint, most of the pundits have overlooked the ultimate madness of the failed attempts by Broon to cobble together a government this week.

If they had got the Lib Dems on board that would have only brought them close to a majority. They would then have had to negotiate with the lunatics in the SNP (3 MP's) and Plaid Cymru (9 MP's) to obtain some sort of majority. (I think I've got the numbers right.) So what would the outcome be then? Yes, make the budget cuts required but they had better not impact on any of the citizens of Auchtermuchty or Llandindrod Wells. Now that's a recipe for tear gas on the streets if ever I saw one!

Politicians are tawdry by nature. This is as tawdry an episode as I can remember for some time though.

Just one other point, I can't wait for the full story to come out about the Labour negotiations with the Lib Dems. Reading between the lines I'm guessing that one or more members of the Labour negotiating team got the mood and approach spectacularly wrong. All good fun!
Spectacularly wrong.

As for lunatics, well we now have a Tory party in power, who were thought of so poorly, that they couldn't get a majority against possibly the second most unpopular PM ever (after Thatch). While Kay Burley is a balloon, I think she was right when she said 67% of the UK voted for a hung parliament.

I'm happy enough though, played right into the SNP hands again, the Libs are now going to struggle to hold seats up there, putting a party into power that is abhorent to most.
Oh yes, my big! The actual figures are Plaid Cymru 3, SNP 6 - which totally bolloxes my point of course! :roll:
God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?

COME ON YOU WHITES!!

mummywhycantieatcrayons
Legend
Legend
Posts: 7192
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: London

Post by mummywhycantieatcrayons » Wed May 12, 2010 12:16 pm

thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...

and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
Chris Grayling put out to pasture - not before time!
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed May 12, 2010 12:18 pm

Worthy4England wrote:
thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...

and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
So the inclusion of Theresa May alters this, how?

sorry - forgot the irony emoticon...

she does like her heels though...

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 pm

they're not being patronising at all -

they have made Theresa May Home Secretary (which is a big enough job in itself)

but then also made her Minister for Women!

presumably on top of his Foreign Secretary job - Hague will me Minister for Men?

User avatar
Prufrock
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 24833
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 11:51 pm

Post by Prufrock » Wed May 12, 2010 12:23 pm

And Cameron Minister for Replicants?
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed May 12, 2010 12:44 pm

Prufrock wrote:And Cameron Minister for Replicants?
someone's been watching too much Charlie Brooker! :wink:

ratbert
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 3067
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:15 pm

Post by ratbert » Wed May 12, 2010 2:41 pm

mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:
thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...

and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
Chris Grayling put out to pasture - not before time!


Last seen trying to check into a B&B run by a gay couple...

...speaking of which, I keep expecting Nick and Dave to start snogging for the cameras any moment.

Tombwfc
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2912
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:37 pm

Post by Tombwfc » Wed May 12, 2010 3:23 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8678143.stm

So they've gone from slagging each other off every week to some weird bromance. Amazing how things change when there's power up for grabs.

thebish
Immortal
Immortal
Posts: 37589
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:01 am
Location: In my armchair

Post by thebish » Wed May 12, 2010 3:54 pm

Image

KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 2479
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
Location: Dr. Alban's

Post by KeeeeeeeBaaaaaaab » Wed May 12, 2010 4:33 pm

Looks like Alan Titchmarsh. After a stroke.

That might just be wishful thinking on my part, though....
www.mini-medallists.co.uk
RobbieSavagesLeg wrote:I'd rather support Bolton than be you

CAPSLOCK
Icon
Icon
Posts: 5790
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 11:35 am

Post by CAPSLOCK » Wed May 12, 2010 4:54 pm

You want to stroke our Alan?

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests