The Politics Thread
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34747
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?
What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?
Fairly standard stuff.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34747
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
That's the one.thebish wrote:who knows? but - it was no more than a couple of hours after the news broke that the lib dems were talking to labour that the tories (through Hague) stood on the steps and publically made a raft of "extra mile" promises that (presumably) they hadn't made when they thought it was just them talking to Nick.CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?
What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
Labour would NEVER have held together the ramshackle alliance that was being suggested with their back benches of perpetual dusgruntlement - their negotiating team are clever enough to have realised that from day one.
anyway... lots of people ringing R5 to say they are joining the labour party (mostly ex lib dems)
So, Labour knew they couldn't hold a coalition together, but the Tories aren't as bright as Labour (or the rest of the country) so they were put under pressureWorthy4England wrote:It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?
What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?
Fairly standard stuff.
No, not having it
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34747
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Your pick.CAPSLOCK wrote:So, Labour knew they couldn't hold a coalition together, but the Tories aren't as bright as Labour (or the rest of the country) so they were put under pressureWorthy4England wrote:It kept the pressure on the negotiations between Cons and Libs - very publically saying that there might be a deal elsewhere, if Cons and Libs didn't reach an agreement. You don't have to be negotiating anything with anybody. Somtimes just making it known that you would be/might be prepared to negotiate as a positioning statement is enough.CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?
What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
Doesn't this happen in business every Contract renewal when the customer is threatening to go out to the market, to make your pricing keener?
Fairly standard stuff.
No, not having it
Can't see any other reason why it would have been done.
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34747
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34747
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
-
- Legend
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:43 pm
- Location: Trotter Shop
who knows? but - it was no more than a couple of hours after the news broke that the lib dems were talking to labour that the tories (through Hague) stood on the steps and publically made a raft of "extra mile" promises that (presumably) they hadn't made when they thought it was just them talking to Nick.thebish wrote:CAPSLOCK wrote:Negotiating tactic?
What was he hoping to negotiate and with who?
Labour would NEVER have held together the ramshackle alliance that was being suggested with their back benches of perpetual dusgruntlement - their negotiating team are clever enough to have realised that from day one.
anyway... lots of people ringing R5 to say they are joining the labour party (mostly ex lib dems)[/quote]
How long before the first defection by a Lib MP?
How long before the second?
And roll on the split. In any by-election there will be a Liberal candidate - even if not endorsed by Clegg.
-
- Icon
- Posts: 5043
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 9:58 am
- Location: 200 miles darn sarf
Oh yes, my big! The actual figures are Plaid Cymru 3, SNP 6 - which totally bolloxes my point of course!fatshaft wrote:Spectacularly wrong.Zulus Thousand of em wrote:In all this sorry mess, and a hung parliament is always a sorry mess irrespective of your political standpoint, most of the pundits have overlooked the ultimate madness of the failed attempts by Broon to cobble together a government this week.
If they had got the Lib Dems on board that would have only brought them close to a majority. They would then have had to negotiate with the lunatics in the SNP (3 MP's) and Plaid Cymru (9 MP's) to obtain some sort of majority. (I think I've got the numbers right.) So what would the outcome be then? Yes, make the budget cuts required but they had better not impact on any of the citizens of Auchtermuchty or Llandindrod Wells. Now that's a recipe for tear gas on the streets if ever I saw one!
Politicians are tawdry by nature. This is as tawdry an episode as I can remember for some time though.
Just one other point, I can't wait for the full story to come out about the Labour negotiations with the Lib Dems. Reading between the lines I'm guessing that one or more members of the Labour negotiating team got the mood and approach spectacularly wrong. All good fun!
As for lunatics, well we now have a Tory party in power, who were thought of so poorly, that they couldn't get a majority against possibly the second most unpopular PM ever (after Thatch). While Kay Burley is a balloon, I think she was right when she said 67% of the UK voted for a hung parliament.
I'm happy enough though, played right into the SNP hands again, the Libs are now going to struggle to hold seats up there, putting a party into power that is abhorent to most.

God's country! God's county!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
God's town! God's team!!
How can we fail?
COME ON YOU WHITES!!
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Chris Grayling put out to pasture - not before time!thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...
and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Worthy4England wrote:So the inclusion of Theresa May alters this, how?thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...
and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
sorry - forgot the irony emoticon...
she does like her heels though...
mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Chris Grayling put out to pasture - not before time!thebish wrote:Theresa May as Home Secretary...
and I was just thinking this cabinet was shaking out as very dominantly "male" - which doesn't look like "new politics" to me...
Last seen trying to check into a B&B run by a gay couple...
...speaking of which, I keep expecting Nick and Dave to start snogging for the cameras any moment.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8678143.stm
So they've gone from slagging each other off every week to some weird bromance. Amazing how things change when there's power up for grabs.
So they've gone from slagging each other off every week to some weird bromance. Amazing how things change when there's power up for grabs.
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2479
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:23 pm
- Location: Dr. Alban's
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests