£15 million on 3 players who do you buy?
Moderator: Zulus Thousand of em
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
He was alright... I'm sure I saw him score for us in a friendly once... Verona rings a bell. I remember thinking at the time that he looked quite talented but that he lacked the physical attributes to make it in the Prem.Prufrock wrote:I liked Walters when he played for us, if he'd come through when we were comfortable as opposed to fighting the drop he might have done better. Then again I thought Liam Ridgewell was a good un so......mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Walters looks a completely different prospect now to the guy I saw play maybe twice for us. He's really filled out and looks like a decent athlete now.Little Green Man wrote:If you were Stoke you could splash out £3.25m on Jon Walters (leaving you with over £10m still for Cleveland Taylor and Nathan Woolfe).
Anyway, he looks much quicker, stronger and tougher now (and not just because he's got a skinhead these days...).
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Well the last three years I've lived with or been close friends with fans of championship clubs, and when Roy Keane described him as the second best player in that division he wasn't that far wrong. I can't remember the games I saw him in but I thought he had the brain for it, now it seems he has the brawn. Again though, according to a similarly aged me, Emmanuel Morini=Star.....mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:He was alright... I'm sure I saw him score for us in a friendly once... Verona rings a bell. I remember thinking at the time that he looked quite talented but that he lacked the physical attributes to make it in the Prem.Prufrock wrote:I liked Walters when he played for us, if he'd come through when we were comfortable as opposed to fighting the drop he might have done better. Then again I thought Liam Ridgewell was a good un so......mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Walters looks a completely different prospect now to the guy I saw play maybe twice for us. He's really filled out and looks like a decent athlete now.Little Green Man wrote:If you were Stoke you could splash out £3.25m on Jon Walters (leaving you with over £10m still for Cleveland Taylor and Nathan Woolfe).
Anyway, he looks much quicker, stronger and tougher now (and not just because he's got a skinhead these days...).
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Yep, I mean not everyone is like Rooney and ready to play a man's game at 16. I don't think it was any accident or even huge misjudgment that meant Blackburn, us, Hull, Crewe, Wrexham and god knows who else decided they weren't keen on him before he finally ended up at Chester.Prufrock wrote:Well the last three years I've lived with or been close friends with fans of championship clubs, and when Roy Keane described him as the second best player in that division he wasn't that far wrong. I can't remember the games I saw him in but I thought he had the brain for it, now it seems he has the brawn. Again though, according to a similarly aged me, Emmanuel Morini=Star.....mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:He was alright... I'm sure I saw him score for us in a friendly once... Verona rings a bell. I remember thinking at the time that he looked quite talented but that he lacked the physical attributes to make it in the Prem.Prufrock wrote:I liked Walters when he played for us, if he'd come through when we were comfortable as opposed to fighting the drop he might have done better. Then again I thought Liam Ridgewell was a good un so......mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Walters looks a completely different prospect now to the guy I saw play maybe twice for us. He's really filled out and looks like a decent athlete now.Little Green Man wrote:If you were Stoke you could splash out £3.25m on Jon Walters (leaving you with over £10m still for Cleveland Taylor and Nathan Woolfe).
Anyway, he looks much quicker, stronger and tougher now (and not just because he's got a skinhead these days...).
Fair play to him for working hard on his conditioning and game since then and fighting his way back up the footballing ladder. I can't think of many who have done it his way. I also can't think of many players who looked quicker at 25 than they did at 19.
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Also by many accounts he was a right cockjob whilst at Bburn and at the reebok. He seems to have settled down. I hope he does well. Apart from against us.mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Yep, I mean not everyone is like Rooney and ready to play a man's game at 16. I don't think it was any accident or even huge misjudgment that meant Blackburn, us, Hull, Crewe, Wrexham and god knows who else decided they weren't keen on him before he finally ended up at Chester.Prufrock wrote:Well the last three years I've lived with or been close friends with fans of championship clubs, and when Roy Keane described him as the second best player in that division he wasn't that far wrong. I can't remember the games I saw him in but I thought he had the brain for it, now it seems he has the brawn. Again though, according to a similarly aged me, Emmanuel Morini=Star.....mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:He was alright... I'm sure I saw him score for us in a friendly once... Verona rings a bell. I remember thinking at the time that he looked quite talented but that he lacked the physical attributes to make it in the Prem.Prufrock wrote:I liked Walters when he played for us, if he'd come through when we were comfortable as opposed to fighting the drop he might have done better. Then again I thought Liam Ridgewell was a good un so......mummywhycantieatcrayons wrote: Walters looks a completely different prospect now to the guy I saw play maybe twice for us. He's really filled out and looks like a decent athlete now.
Anyway, he looks much quicker, stronger and tougher now (and not just because he's got a skinhead these days...).
Fair play to him for working hard on his conditioning and game since then and fighting his way back up the footballing ladder. I can't think of many who have done it his way. I also can't think of many players who looked quicker at 25 than they did at 19.
In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:31 pm
- Location: London
Well, he is from Birkenhead after all.Prufrock wrote: Also by many accounts he was a right cockjob whilst at Bburn and at the reebok. He seems to have settled down. I hope he does well. Apart from against us.
Interesting that he admits here that he didn't look after himself properly when he was with us. And what he says about the role of luck in his career since.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/sp ... ticle.html
Prufrock wrote: Like money hasn't always talked. You might not like it, or disagree, but it's the truth. It's a basic incentive, people always have, and always will want what's best for themselves and their families
Indeed, saw a lot of him both playing and off pitch around the time he became Ipswich's main man. Seems to have grown up a lot, and I think it takes a certain strength of character to go that far down and come back again. There's lads who leave Bolton at 18/19 who end up not getting a game for Chorley, and to go from being by many accounts a right little sh*t, to being a proper ambitious professional, especially as a plastic scouser, one of your lotmummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Well, he is from Birkenhead after all.Prufrock wrote: Also by many accounts he was a right cockjob whilst at Bburn and at the reebok. He seems to have settled down. I hope he does well. Apart from against us.
Interesting that he admits here that he didn't look after himself properly when he was with us. And what he says about the role of luck in his career since.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/sp ... ticle.html

In a world that has decided
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
That it's going to lose its mind
Be more kind, my friends, try to be more kind.
Is this the same Jon Walters who was described on another thread as "thrown out of Blackburn for being allegedly a tea leaf in the dressing room", and on the same thread someone implied that there were similar alleagtions when he was with us?Prufrock wrote:Indeed, saw a lot of him both playing and off pitch around the time he became Ipswich's main man. Seems to have grown up a lot, and I think it takes a certain strength of character to go that far down and come back again. There's lads who leave Bolton at 18/19 who end up not getting a game for Chorley, and to go from being by many accounts a right little sh*t, to being a proper ambitious professional, especially as a plastic scouser, one of your lotmummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Well, he is from Birkenhead after all.Prufrock wrote: Also by many accounts he was a right cockjob whilst at Bburn and at the reebok. He seems to have settled down. I hope he does well. Apart from against us.
Interesting that he admits here that he didn't look after himself properly when he was with us. And what he says about the role of luck in his career since.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/sp ... ticle.html, must speak volumes for him.
Maybe he has grown up then
What goes around may still come around
Yeah, I think that was certainly supposed to be the case at B'Burn, not sure if he did it here. Good for him if he's turned it around.bw@bw wrote:Is this the same Jon Walters who was described on another thread as "thrown out of Blackburn for being allegedly a tea leaf in the dressing room", and on the same thread someone implied that there were similar alleagtions when he was with us?Prufrock wrote:Indeed, saw a lot of him both playing and off pitch around the time he became Ipswich's main man. Seems to have grown up a lot, and I think it takes a certain strength of character to go that far down and come back again. There's lads who leave Bolton at 18/19 who end up not getting a game for Chorley, and to go from being by many accounts a right little sh*t, to being a proper ambitious professional, especially as a plastic scouser, one of your lotmummywhycantieatcrayons wrote:Well, he is from Birkenhead after all.Prufrock wrote: Also by many accounts he was a right cockjob whilst at Bburn and at the reebok. He seems to have settled down. I hope he does well. Apart from against us.
Interesting that he admits here that he didn't look after himself properly when he was with us. And what he says about the role of luck in his career since.
http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/sp ... ticle.html, must speak volumes for him.
Maybe he has grown up then
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31612
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
-
- Immortal
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 4:27 pm
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
If nothing went to court, then you'd have to be able to prove he was a thieving barsteward as you have said that he is. If nothing ever came to court, then I'd countenance treading carefully as DSB has mentioned.boltonboris wrote:Okay, but this isn't a rumour or owt. It's THE reason he was thrown outDave Sutton's barnet wrote:Careful with the legals, people.
That he left Bolton and Blackburn isn't the issue. That's a fairly provable fact.
- Dave Sutton's barnet
- Immortal
- Posts: 31612
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Hanging on in quiet desperation
- Contact:
That's not what he could sue overWorthy4England wrote:If nothing went to court, then you'd have to be able to prove he was a thieving barsteward as you have said that he is. If nothing ever came to court, then I'd countenance treading carefully as DSB has mentioned. That he left Bolton and Blackburn isn't the issue. That's a fairly provable fact.boltonboris wrote:Okay, but this isn't a rumour or owt. It's THE reason he was thrown outDave Sutton's barnet wrote:Careful with the legals, people.

Two questions: Can they sue? Will they sue? I doubt he would but it's a risk, and he's tenaciously built his career back up from the dead, he wouldn't exactly want to be besmirched (although the counter-argument is that legal action would only expose it).
If a person has been cautioned rather than convicted, you have to have a very robust reason for mentioning it at all - say, if he is accused of a further offence (preferably related). If you are sued, he has nothing to prove at all: you have to justify your reason and quite possibly produce evidence that it happened at all.
Even if a person is convicted, there are certain lengths of time after which some crimes are no longer mentionable ("lapsed conviction" or "spent conviction"). For the record, these are:
Conviction resulting in a fine: five years
Conviction resulting in a jail term up to six months: seven years
Conviction resulting in a jail term more than six months but less than 30: 10 years
Conviction resulting in a jail term of 30 months or more: never
Right, that's my public duty done, I'm off to bugger a squirrel
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:That's not what he could sue overWorthy4England wrote:If nothing went to court, then you'd have to be able to prove he was a thieving barsteward as you have said that he is. If nothing ever came to court, then I'd countenance treading carefully as DSB has mentioned. That he left Bolton and Blackburn isn't the issue. That's a fairly provable fact.boltonboris wrote:Okay, but this isn't a rumour or owt. It's THE reason he was thrown outDave Sutton's barnet wrote:Careful with the legals, people.![]()
Two questions: Can they sue? Will they sue? I doubt he would but it's a risk, and he's tenaciously built his career back up from the dead, he wouldn't exactly want to be besmirched (although the counter-argument is that legal action would only expose it).
If a person has been cautioned rather than convicted, you have to have a very robust reason for mentioning it at all - say, if he is accused of a further offence (preferably related). If you are sued, he has nothing to prove at all: you have to justify your reason and quite possibly produce evidence that it happened at all.
Even if a person is convicted, there are certain lengths of time after which some crimes are no longer mentionable ("lapsed conviction" or "spent conviction"). For the record, these are:
Conviction resulting in a fine: five years
Conviction resulting in a jail term up to six months: seven years
Conviction resulting in a jail term more than six months but less than 30: 10 years
Conviction resulting in a jail term of 30 months or more: never
Right, that's my public duty done, I'm off to bugger a squirrel
....but will still appear on any CRB check and MUST be declared if you are filling out most VISA applications to travel abroad. Allegedley.

- Montreal Wanderer
- Immortal
- Posts: 12948
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:45 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Driving offenses result in a conviction and a fine - surely such are not declared....? As for the suit, he would have to prove what a tea leaf meant (which took me a couple of minutes not being a WHam supporter).Gary the Enfield wrote:Dave Sutton's barnet wrote:That's not what he could sue overWorthy4England wrote:If nothing went to court, then you'd have to be able to prove he was a thieving barsteward as you have said that he is. If nothing ever came to court, then I'd countenance treading carefully as DSB has mentioned. That he left Bolton and Blackburn isn't the issue. That's a fairly provable fact.boltonboris wrote:Okay, but this isn't a rumour or owt. It's THE reason he was thrown outDave Sutton's barnet wrote:Careful with the legals, people.![]()
Two questions: Can they sue? Will they sue? I doubt he would but it's a risk, and he's tenaciously built his career back up from the dead, he wouldn't exactly want to be besmirched (although the counter-argument is that legal action would only expose it).
If a person has been cautioned rather than convicted, you have to have a very robust reason for mentioning it at all - say, if he is accused of a further offence (preferably related). If you are sued, he has nothing to prove at all: you have to justify your reason and quite possibly produce evidence that it happened at all.
Even if a person is convicted, there are certain lengths of time after which some crimes are no longer mentionable ("lapsed conviction" or "spent conviction"). For the record, these are:
Conviction resulting in a fine: five years
Conviction resulting in a jail term up to six months: seven years
Conviction resulting in a jail term more than six months but less than 30: 10 years
Conviction resulting in a jail term of 30 months or more: never
Right, that's my public duty done, I'm off to bugger a squirrel
....but will still appear on any CRB check and MUST be declared if you are filling out most VISA applications to travel abroad. Allegedley.
"If you cannot answer a man's argument, all it not lost; you can still call him vile names. " Elbert Hubbard.
- Gary the Enfield
- Legend
- Posts: 8610
- Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: Enfield
-
- Passionate
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2005 5:56 am
- Location: Seattle, WA, USA
- Worthy4England
- Immortal
- Posts: 34731
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Re: £15 million on 3 players who do you buy?
Chris Brunt
Joey Barton
David Wheater
Job done!
Joey Barton
David Wheater
Job done!
French centre-back currently without club, will consider any role. Experienced plumber.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests